RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to explore patients' preparedness for emergency hemodialysis in the event of a natural disaster and to determine the factors affecting such preparedness.A cross-sectional study was conducted in undergoing hemodialysis at dialysis facilities in Sapporo, Hokkaido. The participants were a cohort of 256 outpatients aged 20âyears or older, 186 (72.7%) were male, and the average age was 61.9â±â10.9âyears. The participants were divided into those who had prepared for emergency dialysis treatment and those who had not. Cross tabulations were performed on the 2 groups using the following participant attributes: preparedness for dialysis during a disaster, knowledge of how to protect themselves during a disaster, and intention to dialyze and evacuate during a disaster, followed by binomial logistic regression analysis.Of the 256 study patients, 184 (71.9%) were not prepared for dialysis treatment. In logistic regression models, patients who were not prepared for dialysis treatment were found to have higher odds of being employed (odds ratio (OR): 2.469; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.205-5.058), not being aware of disaster information acquisition methods in the event of a disaster (OR: 4.580, 95%; CI: 2.048-10.241), did not receive explanations on proper disaster response from dialysis facility staff (OR: 2.557, 95%; CI: 1.319-4.954), and believing that their family away from home would not be concerned about them (OR: 2.021; 95% CI: 1.062-3.847).Disaster preparedness in patients undergoing dialysis remain inadequate. Dialysis facilities need to strengthen their explanations of disaster response, particularly with regard to working, middle-aged people.
Asunto(s)
Desastres , Desastres Naturales , Anciano , Concienciación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis RenalRESUMEN
This study investigated factors affecting disaster preparedness and evacuation intentions among home-care patients dependent on electrical power for life support. Health professionals interviewed 53 home-care patients using the Kanazawa and Kochi Disaster Preparedness Checklist. About half of the participants requiring continuous artificial ventilation or aspiration indicated that they would not or could not evacuate following a disaster-even though their lives could be at risk. The availability of emergency medical equipment for use during a power outage was positively associated with the desire to evacuate. Our results indicate the need for improved systems to assist power-dependent home-care patients.