Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Órganos en Riesgo , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Proton treatment can potentially spare patients with H&N cancer for substantial treatment-related toxicities. The current study investigated the reproducibility of a decentralised model-based selection of patients for a proton treatment study when the selection plans were compared to the clinical treatment plans performed at the proton centre. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were selected for proton treatment in the six Danish Head and Neck Cancer (DAHANCA) centres. The patients were selected based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) estimated from local photon and proton treatment plans, which showed a ΔNTCP greater than 5%-point for either grade 2 + dysphagia or grade 2 + xerostomia at six months. The selection plans were compared to the clinical treatment plans performed at the proton centre. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients, 49 and 25 were selected based on an estimated benefit in risk of dysphagia and xerostomia, respectively. Eleven patients had a potential gain in both toxicities. The mean ΔNTCP changed from the local selection plan comparison to the clinical comparison from 6.9 to 5.3 %-points (p = 0.01) and 7.3 to 4.9 %-points (p = 0.03) for dysphagia and xerostomia, respectively. Volume differences in both CTV and OAR could add to the loss in ΔNTCP. 61 of the 63 clinical plans had a positive ΔNTCP, and 38 had a ΔNTCP of 5%-points for at least one of the two endpoints. CONCLUSION: A local treatment plan comparison can be used to select candidates for proton treatment. The local comparative proton plan overestimates the potential benefit of the clinical proton plan. Continuous quality assurance of the delineation procedures and planning is crucial in the subsequent randomised clinical trial setting.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Terapia de Protones , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Xerostomía , Humanos , Protones , Órganos en Riesgo , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/etiología , Xerostomía/etiología , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) 35 trial, patients are selected for proton treatment based on simulated reductions of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for proton compared to photon treatment at the referring departments. After inclusion in the trial, immobilization, scanning, contouring and planning are repeated at the national proton centre. The new contours could result in reduced expected NTCP gain of the proton plan, resulting in a loss of validity in the selection process. The present study evaluates if contour consistency can be improved by having access to AI (Artificial Intelligence) based contours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 63 patients in the DAHANCA 35 pilot trial had a CT from the local DAHANCA centre and one from the proton centre. A nationally validated convolutional neural network, based on nnU-Net, was used to contour OARs on both scans for each patient. Using deformable image registration, local AI and oncologist contours were transferred to the proton centre scans for comparison. Consistency was calculated with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Mean Surface Distance (MSD), comparing contours from AI to AI and oncologist to oncologist, respectively. Two NTCP models were applied to calculate NTCP for xerostomia and dysphagia. RESULTS: The AI contours showed significantly better consistency than the contours by oncologists. The median and interquartile range of DSC was 0.85 [0.78 - 0.90] and 0.68 [0.51 - 0.80] for AI and oncologist contours, respectively. The median and interquartile range of MSD was 0.9 mm [0.7 - 1.1] mm and 1.9 mm [1.5 - 2.6] mm for AI and oncologist contours, respectively. There was no significant difference in ΔNTCP. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that OAR contours made by the AI algorithm were more consistent than those made by oncologists. No significant impact on the ΔNTCP calculations could be discerned.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Órganos en Riesgo , Protones , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodosRESUMEN
This paper suggests a setup for using remote eye-tracking on a touchscreen tablet to evaluate user interaction for older adults interacting with a user-driven hearing test. By using video recordings to support the eye-tracking data, it was possible to evaluate quantitative usability metrics that could be compared to other research findings. The video recordings revealed useful information to distinguish between reasons for gaps in data and missing data and to inform future similar studies of human-computer interaction on a touch screen. Using only portable equipment allows researchers to move to the location of the user and investigate the user interaction of devices in real-world scenarios.