RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a valuable metric to assess postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess TO in patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort NSQIP study from 2015 to 2018. TOs are defined as no complication or mortality and length of stay within the 75th percentile. RESULTS: This study included 44 235 patients. Of those patients, 61% underwent pancreatic surgery (PS) and 39% hepatic surgery (HS). The most common surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy (16 464), followed by partial hepatectomy (11 817), distal pancreatectomy (8292), hemihepatectomy (4247), hepatic trisegmentectomy (1366) and total pancreatectomy (706). TO was more common for HS than PS, 47% versus 40%, p < .001. TO was more common for younger (0-65, OR: 1.60; CI: 1.30-1.96, p < .001), female (OR: 1.23; CI: 1.17-1.29, p < .001), white (OR: 1.10; CI: 1.01-1.19, p = .022), and lower ASA class (OR: 2.11; CI: 1.54-2.90, p < .001) patients. For patients undergoing HS TO was more common after partial lobectomy than trisegmentectomy and lobectomy (OR: 1.36; CI: 1.18-1.57, p < .001). For those undergoing PS, there was a lower likelihood of TO for those who are obese/morbidly obese compared to normal-weight patients (OR: 0.73; CI: 0.67-0.79, p < .001). Unlike HS, TO for patients undergoing PS was not associated with the type of surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: TO is a composite that can be applied to a national data set to analyze outcome quality. In HS, more complex surgical procedures are associated with a decreased likelihood of TO. In PS, TO are similar regardless of the procedure but less common in obese or morbidly obese patients.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive (MI) surgery has been widely adopted to treat left-sided pancreatic cancer. However, outcomes are not clearly defined. MATERIALS: Retrospective cohort study utilizing NCDB and NSQIP data. RESULTS: Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2016 were included (n = 7347). Utilizing NSQIP (n = 2406), patients were divided into two groups: intention-to-treat (ITT) MI (including MI converted to open, n = 929) and open (n = 1477). Patients undergoing open pancreatectomy were more likely to have longer length of stay (6 vs. 5 days, p=<0.001). On multivariate analysis, open procedures were not associated with mortality (OR 1.24; CI 0.51-3.30, p = 0.64), serious complications (OR 1.03; CI 0.90-1.37, p = 0.79), and any complications (OR 1.07; CI 0.86-1.32, p = 0.56). NCDB patients (n = 4941) were also divided into two groups, ITT MI (n = 1,769, 36%) and open group (n = 3,172, 64%). The median survival was lower in open procedure patients, 23 vs. 27.1 months (p < 0.001). This finding was maintained on multivariable analysis (HR 1.16; CI 1.03-1.32, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Based on these data, MI distal pancreatectomy could be considered a standard of care for pancreatic cancer when technically feasible. Although morbidity and mortality were similar, the laparoscopic approach had a shorter length of stay and could hasten recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seminal trials have demonstrated improved survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with novel multiagent chemotherapy regimens. To understand the clinical ramifications of this paradigm shift, we reviewed our institutional experience. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized a prospective database at a single institution to study all patients diagnosed with and treated for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: 1,572 patients were included of which 36% were diagnosed before (Era 1) and 64% after (Era 2) 2011. Survival improved in Era 2 (Median survival 10 vs 8 months, HR .79; P < .001). The survival advantage for Era 2 was primarily seen in patients with high-risk disease (12 vs10 months, HR .71; P < .001). A similar trend was noted for patients undergoing surgical resection (26 vs 21 months, HR .80; P = .081) and with imminently resectable tumors (19 vs 15 months, HR .88; P = .4); however, this was not statistically significant. There was no survival advantage for patients with stage IV disease (4 vs 4 months). Patients in Era 2 were more likely to undergo surgery (OR 2.78; CI 2.00-3.92, P < .001). This increase was driven primarily by increased surgical resection for those with high-risk disease (42 vs 20%, OR 3.74; P < .001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: This single institutional study showed improved survival after the shift to novel chemotherapy regimens. This was driven by improved survival for patients with high-risk disease and may be due to more effective eradication of microscopic metastatic disease with adjuvant chemotherapy and increased resection rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The advent of effective chemotherapy regimens has increased the use of neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. However, the effect of tumor downstaging with neoadjuvant treatment on survival is unclear. METHODS: Retrospective study included all resected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/Abraxane. Downstaging was quantified using (1) difference between presenting AJCC clinical and final pathologic stage and (2) College of American Pathologists (CAP) Tumor Regression Grading Schema. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. FOLFIRINOX was the most common regimen, 63.2% vs 21.8%. Change in regimen occurred in 15% of patients. Downstaging based on a difference in AJCC stage group occurred in only 4.6%. In contrast, 45.2% were classified as downstaged by the CAP Tumor Regression of 0-2. Downstaging was similar for FOLFIRINOX gemcitabine/Abraxane (64.7 vs 53.6, P = .12) using the CAP criteria. On univariate analysis, treatment regimen (gemcitabine/Abraxane vs FOLFIRINOX, median survival 27 vs 29 mo; HR 1.57, P = .2) had similar survival. Downstaging by the AJCC stage was not associated with improved survival (HR 1.51, P = .4). However, there was a survival benefit for those downstaged by the CAP Tumor Regression Grading Schema, the median survival of 41 mo vs 25 mo; HR 3.05, P = .009. Improved survival 3.32 (1.35-8.16), P = .009) was maintained on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Survival is significantly improved in those downstaged, as assessed by the CAP Tumor Regression Schema. Downstaging is an important prognostic variable that can help with joint decision making for clinicians and patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Downstaging has been associated with improved survival for many cancers. However, the implications of downstaging are unclear for pancreatic cancer in an era of effective neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: NCDB retrospective cohort study of resected pancreatic carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: The study included 73,985 patients: 66,589 with no neoadjuvant therapy, 2,102 neoadjuvant radiation therapy (N-RT), 3,195 neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy (N-MAC) and 2.099 with both neoadjuvant radiation and multiagent chemotherapy. There was increased use of N-MAC over the period of this study. Patients selected for treatment with N-MAC had longer survival from surgery on univariate (23.1 vs. 18.7 months, p = < 0.01) and multivariate analyses HR 0.81 (0.76-0.87, p < 0.001) compared to those selected with N-RT. Downstaging was similar in N-RT and N-MAC groups (25.1 vs. 24.1%, p = 0.43). Downstaging following N-MAC was associated with a survival benefit, HR 0.85 (0.74-0.98). However, downstaging following N-RT was not associated with a survival advantage, HR 1.12 (0.99-0.99). CONCLUSION: Clinicians have rapidly adopted N-MAC for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Although the rates of downstaging are similar between treatment groups, response translates into increased survival only with N-MAC and not with N-RT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade, a paradigm shift has been made in treating pancreatic cancer. Starting in 2011, several trials demonstrated a survival advantage for multiagent chemotherapy (MAC). However, the implication for survival at the population level remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective study of the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2019 was conducted. Patients treated from 2006 to 2010 were classified as "Era 1", and those treated from 2011 to 2019 as "Era 2." RESULTS: A total of 316,393 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified, with 87,742 treated in Era 1 and 228,651 in Era 2. Survival increased from Era 1 to Era 2 in all patients and sub-analyses; surgical (18.7 vs 24.6 months, HR .85, 95% CI 0.82-.88, P < .001), imminently resectable (Stage IA and IB, 12.2 vs 14.8 months, HR .90, 95% CI 0.86-.95, P < .001), high-risk (Stage IIA, IIB, and III, 9.6 vs 11.6 months, HR .82, 95% CI 0.79-.85, P < .001), and Stage IV (3.5 vs 3.9 months, HR .86, 95% CI 0.84-.89, P < .001). Survival was decreased for those who were African American (P = .031), on Medicaid (P < .001), or in the lowest quartile of annual income (P < .001). Surgery rates decreased from 20.5% in Era 1 to 19.8% in Era 2 (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Adoption of MAC regimens at a population level correlates with improved pancreatic cancer survival. Unfortunately, socioeconomic factors are associated with an unequal benefit from new treatment regimens, and underuse of surgery for resectable neoplasms persists.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data for pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement. RESULTS: A total of 23 903 patients with vascular involvement were included and divided into 3 groups; no treatment (40.6%), medical treatment (36.6%), and resection (22.8%). Of the patients undergoing resection, 31.3% received neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy (N-MAC). The remainder were treated with postoperative adjuvant treatment (33.8%), surgery alone (24.9%), preoperative radiotherapy (8.3%), or single-agent preoperative chemotherapy (1.7%). Median survival for N-MAC was superior (28.42 months) when compared to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (20.73 months), neoadjuvant single-agent chemotherapy (20.8 months), postoperative adjuvant therapy (17.87 months), and surgery alone (10.12 months). N-MAC was associated with improved survival compared to postoperative multiagent chemotherapy (P-MAC) (28.4 vs 16.95, HR 1.82; CI 1.64-2.02, P < .0010) (Figure 1). The addition of radiation therapy to N-MAC did not improve survival (27.4 vs 29.8, HR .93; CI .83-1.05, P = .3). Clinical downstaging occurred in 40% of patients treated with N-MAC, and downstaging was associated with improved survival (HR .74; CI .64-.85, P < .001). N-MAC patients were more likely to undergo an R0 resection than P-MAC (74% v. 48, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most resected pancreatic cancer patients in this study with vascular involvement receive either postoperative or no adjuvant therapy. N-MAC increases downstaging, R0 resection rates, and survival.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Surgeons have created numerous iterations of the pancreatic fistula risk score (FRS) to predict risk for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The multitude of often conflicting models makes it difficult for surgeons to apply data in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2015 to 2018. The study included patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Missing data were resolved with multiple imputations. RESULTS: The study included 5975 patients; 1018 (17%) had a CR-POPF. On multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio (OR) 1.60 CI: 1.29-1.98 P < .001), obesity (OR 1.65 CI: 1.31-2.08 P < .001), and soft gland texture (OR 3.21 CI: 2.45-4.23 P < .001) were all associated with increased odds of a CR-POPF. Variables not associated with CR-POPF included diabetes, preoperative bilirubin, preoperative albumin, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. On multivariate analysis, duct diameter >6 mm (OR .52 CI: .34-.77 P = .001), pancreatic adenocarcinoma pathology (OR .67 CI: .53-.84 P < .001), and neoadjuvant treatment (OR .71 CI: .51-.98 P = .042) were all associated with decreased odds of a CR-POPF. We constructed a clinically relevant nomogram from this model known as the Portland FRS. Model characteristics were superior to previously published FRS models. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Portland FRS was .72 (CI: .704-.737). In comparison, AUCs for the Alternative and Seoul FRS were .70 and .64, respectively. CONCLUSION: Utilizing readily available clinical data, the Portland FRS can accurately predict the risk for pancreatic fistula. The nomogram may assist surgeons in patient counseling and perioperative management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Loss of independence (LOI) is a significant concern for patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery. Although the risk for morbidity and mortality has been well studied, there is a dearth of data on risk for LOI. METHODS: This study utilized NSQIP data from 2015 to 2018 in a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing high-risk gastrointestinal surgery (e.g. gastric, colorectal, liver, and pancreatic). RESULTS: The study included 229,573 patients who were preoperatively functionally independent. Of those, 5.3% experienced LOI. The median age for LOI patients was 74 (CI: 67-81), and 56% were female. The most common race was white (n = 9585), followed by African-American (n = 1223) and other (n = 369). The most common GI procedure was colorectal (65%), followed by the pancreas (23%), liver (8.2%), and gastric (3%). On univariate analysis, age, sex, BMI, race, frailty, and pancreatectomy were associated with LOI. On multivariate analysis age (≥85, OR 18.3 CI:16.9-19.9 p < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.24CI: 1.19-1.29 p < 0.001), BMI <18.5 (OR 1.66 CI:1.48-1.86 p < 0.001), BMI >40 (OR 1.43 CI:1.31-1.56 p < 0.001), African American race (OR 1.20 CI:1.12-1.28 p < 0.001), smoking (OR 1.21 CI:1.14-1.28 p < 0.001), frailty (MFI-5 > 2, OR 4.47 CI:2.63-7.31 p < 0.001), and pancreatectomy (OR 1.86 CI:1.74-1.98 p < 0.001) continued to be associated with LOI. To better define a predictive model, the NSQIP risk calculator was compared to the modified frailty index-5. AUC was 0.80 (CI: 0.797-0.805) and 0.76 (0.760-0.769), respectively. CONCLUSION: LOI occurs in over five percent of patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery. LOI occurs more commonly after pancreatectomy or for those who are frail, underweight, or morbidly obese. Both frailty and the NSQIP risk calculator models similarly predicted LOI.

Asunto(s)