RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Mechanical linear staplers have been safely used in urology with an acceptable 0% to 7.9% rate of stone formation in long-term follow-up. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of using mechanical circular stapler devices to perform ileocapsuloplasty following cystoadenomectomy in cadavers. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Three unfrozen cadavers were used in this study. The prostate was enucleated and removed along with the bladder, leaving an ample cavity wherein the 21-mm anvil could be easily accommodated. A 2-0 purse string suture was then placed at the prostate capsule rim and tightly tied around the anvil. Following this, the circular stapler device was introduced into the neobladder through its opened limb and the center rod of the stapler device was passed through an opening made at the most dependent portion of the pouch where another purse string suture was placed and tied around it. Finally, the center rod of the stapler was connected to the anvil and fired, thus completing the anastomosis. RESULTS: The procedure was feasible in all cases and 2 intact rings of prostatic capsule and bowel tissue were obtained, thus attesting the integrity of the anastomoses. Retrograde injection of methylene blue reassured that a watertight anastomosis was achieved whereas cystoscopic and macroscopic examination of the anastomotic site demonstrated a wide patent anastomosis in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Use of mechanical circular stapler to perform ileocapsuloplasty in cadavers is feasible and has potential advantages such as decreased anastomotic time, diminished chances of urinary extravasations, and reduced degree of difficulty.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Suturas , Titanio , Derivación Urinaria/instrumentación , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Cadáver , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Íleon/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We report our experience with 43 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had a poor function from obstructive uropathology and renal atrophy. None of these patients had a previous lumbotomy. Retroperitoneoscopy was performed with 4 trocar port technique in a lateral position. The retroperitoneal space is created by using a Gaur's balloon made of sterile glove. The approach to vascular pedicle was done posteriorly and vessels were clipped by metal and Hem-o-lock (Weck Closure Systems, North Carolina, USA) clips. The sample was intact extracted in an Endo-Bag prolonging one trocar incision. RESULTS: Median operative time was 160 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. Four cases (9%) were converted to open surgery: one case due to bleeding and 3 cases due to technical difficulties regarding perirenal adherences. Most patients (39) checked out from the Hospital in day two. Four of them were left over 3 days due to wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopy offers a safe, effective and reproductive access to nephrectomy for benign pathologies.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We report our experience with 43 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had a poor function from obstructive uropathology and renal atrophy. None of these patients had a previous lumbotomy. Retroperitoneoscopy was performed with 4 trocar port technique in a lateral position. The retroperitoneal space is created by using a Gaur's balloon made of sterile glove. The approach to vascular pedicle was done posteriorly and vessels were clipped by metal and Hem-o-lock (Weck Closure Systems, North Carolina, USA) clips. The sample was intact extracted in an Endo-Bag prolonging one trocar incision. RESULTS: Median operative time was 160 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. Four cases (9 percent) were converted to open surgery: one case due to bleeding and 3 cases due to technical difficulties regarding perirenal adherences. Most patients (39) checked out from the Hospital in day two. Four of them were left over 3 days due to wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopy offers a safe, effective and reproductive access to nephrectomy for benign pathologies.