RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite overwhelming evidence in favour of a relaxed fasting protocol, the traditional practice of keeping patients nil per oral from midnight before the day of surgery for all elective operations still appears to hold sway in many practices. METHODS: A prospective study to evaluate the pattern of preoperative fasting among patients undergoing elective general surgical operations in the Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, was conducted between June and December 2020. Data obtained was analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24, and presented as descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: The mean prescribed fasting duration was 11.2 ± 2.4 hours. The mean actual fasting duration of 17.6 ± 13.1 hours was significantly longer than the mean prescribed fasting duration (p= <0.001). Eighty-nine percent of patients fasted for >12 hours before their surgical operations. Bowel surgeries had the longest actual fasting duration of 34.9 ± 27.5 hours, while ventral hernia repairs and superficial mass excisions had the shortest duration of 13.5 ± 0.7 hours. Surgeries performed after noon had the longest actual fasting duration compared to those performed before noon (21.5 ± 18.7 hours vs. 15.6 ± 8.6 hours). Ninety percent of respondents reported hunger score of>4 while fasting. CONCLUSION: Preoperative fasting duration in our surgical unit remains long and conventional. The potential implications of this practice on patients' physiological status and surgical outcomes are strong enough to motivate a change.
CONTEXTE: Malgré les preuves accablantes en faveur d'un protocole de jeûne assoupli, la pratique traditionnelle consistant à maintenir les patients à jeun par voie orale à partir de minuit avant le jour de l'intervention chirurgicale pour toutes les opérations non urgentes semble toujours avoir cours dans de nombreux cabinets. MÉTHODES: Une étude prospective visant à évaluer le modèle de jeûne préopératoire chez les patients subissant des opérations chirurgicales générales non urgentes dans le département de chirurgie, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, a été menée entre juin et décembre 2020. Les données obtenues ont été analysées à l'aide du logiciel IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24, et présentées sous forme de statistiques descriptives sous forme de fréquences et de pourcentages. RÉSULTATS: La durée moyenne de jeûne prescrite était de 11,2 ± 2,4 heures. La durée moyenne du jeûne effectif de 17,6 ± 13,1 heures était significativement plus longue que la durée moyenne du jeûne prescrit (p= <0,001). Quatre-vingt-neuf pour cent des patients sont restés à jeun pendant plus de 12 heures avant leur intervention chirurgicale. Les opérations de l'intestin ont eu la durée de jeûne réelle la plus longue, soit 34,9 ± 27,5 heures, tandis que les réparations de hernies ventrales et les excisions de masses superficielles ont eu la durée la plus courte, soit 13,5 ± 0,7 heures. Les interventions chirurgicales réalisées après midi ont eu la durée de jeûne réelle la plus longue par rapport à celles réalisées avant midi (21,5 ± 18,7 heures contre 15,6 ± 8,6 heures). Quatre-vingt-dix pour cent des personnes interrogées ont signalé une sensation de faim >4 pendant le jeûne. CONCLUSION: La durée du jeûne préopératoire dans notre unité chirurgicale reste longue et conventionnelle. Les implications potentielles de cette pratique sur l'état physiologique des patients et les résultats chirurgicaux sont suffisamment fortes pour motiver un changement. Mots-clés: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA), Score de faim, Nil Per Oral (NPO), Jeûne de nuit, Jeûne prolongé, Protocole de jeûne traditionnel.
Asunto(s)
Ayuno , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Nigeria , Estudios Prospectivos , UniversidadesRESUMEN
Background and Aim: The deleterious effects of Resident Doctors' (RDs') long duty hours are well documented. Driven by concerns over the physician's well-being and patient safety, the RDs' duty hours in many developed countries have been capped. However, in Nigeria and many African countries, there are no official regulations on work hours of RDs. This study evaluated the work schedule of Nigerian RDs and its impact on their wellbeing and patient safety. Subjects and Methods: A national survey of 1105 Nigerian RDs from all specialties in 59 training institutions was conducted. With an electronic questionnaire designed using Google Forms, data on the work activities of RDs were obtained and analyzed using the IBM SPSS software version 24. The associations were compared using Chi-squared test with the level of significance set at < 0.05. Results: The mean weekly duty hours (h) of the RDs was 106.5 ± 50.4. Surgical residents worked significantly longer hours than non-surgical residents (122.7 ± 34.2 h vs 100.0 ± 43.9 h; P < 0.001). The modal on-call frequency was two weekday on-calls per week (474, 42.9%) and two weekend on-calls per month (495, 44.8%), with the majority of RDs working continuously for up to 24 hours during weekday on-calls (854, 77.3%) and 48-72 hours during weekend on-calls (568, 51.4%), sleeping for an average of only four hours during these on-calls. The majority of RDs had post-call clinical responsibilities (975, 88.2%) and desired official regulation of duty hours (1,031, 93.3%). Conclusion: The duty hours of Nigerian RDs are currently long and unregulated. There is an urgent need to regulate them for patient and physician safety.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Carga de Trabajo , Humanos , Nigeria , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal operations carry significant risk of mortality and morbidity. The time of the day when such operations are performed has been suggested as a predictor of outcome. A retrospective comparison of outcomes of daytime and night-time emergency abdominal operations was conducted. METHODS: Clinical data of patients who had abdominal operations over a five-year period were obtained. Operations were classified as 'daytime' (group A) if performed between 8.00 am and 7.59 pm or 'night time' if performed between 8.00 pm and 7.59 am (group B). Post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 267 emergency abdominal operations were analysed: 161 (60.3%) were performed in the daytime while 106 (39.7%) were performed at night. The case mix in both groups was similar with appendectomies, bowel resections and closure of bowel perforations accounting for the majority. Baseline characteristics and intra-operative parameters were similar except that 'daytime' operations had more consultant participation (p = 0.01). Mortality rates (13.7% in group A and 12.3% in group B, p = 0.2), re-operation rates (9.3% in group A and 10.4% in group B, p = 0.7) and duration of hospital stay (group A-11.1 days, group B-12.4 days p = 0.4) were similar. ASA status, re-operation and admission into the intensive care unit were identified as predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Timing of emergency abdominal operations did not influence outcomes. In resource-limited settings where access to the operating room is competitive, delaying operations till daytime may be counterproductive. Patients' clinical condition still remains the most important parameter guiding time of operation.