RESUMEN
Over last fifty years, intravenous (iv) phenytoin (PHT) loading dose has been the treatment of choice for patients with benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus and several guidelines recommended this treatment regimen with simultaneous iv diazepam. Clinical studies have never shown a better efficacy of PHT over other antiepileptic drugs. In addition, iv PHT loading dose is a complex and time-consuming procedure which may expose patients to several risks, such as local cutaneous reactions (purple glove syndrome), severe hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias up to ventricular fibrillation and death, and increased risk of severe allergic reactions. A further disadvantage of PHT is that it is a strong enzymatic inducer and it may make ineffective several drugs that need to be used simultaneously with antiepileptic treatment. In patients with a benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus, we suggest iv administration of levetiracetam as soon as possible. If levetiracetam would be ineffective, a further antiepileptic drug among those currently available for iv use (valproate, lacosamide, or phenytoin) can be added before starting third line treatment.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Fenitoína/administración & dosificación , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Administración Intravenosa , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Exantema/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Levetiracetam , Fenitoína/efectos adversos , Piracetam/administración & dosificación , Piracetam/efectos adversos , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol, Chest Abdominal-Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (CA-FAST), during the primary survey and to estimate its diagnostic accuracy when compared with thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: A prospective accuracy study was performed from November 2012 to November 2013 at the Emergency Department. Only adult trauma patients who underwent a CA-FAST examination prior to a thoracoabdominal CT scan were enrolled. In addition to standard patterns detected by Extended-FAST (E-FAST) such as pneumothorax (PTX), hemothorax (HTX), pericardial and intraabdominal effusion, CA-FAST protocol also included the research of lung contusions (LCs). RESULTS: Six hundred and one patients were enrolled. The mean time for protocol execution was 7 ± 3 min. Chest ultrasonography showed the following results (all p < 0.001): LCs sensitivity 59 %, specificity 98 %, positive predictive value (PPV) 92 %, negative predictive value (NPV) 86 %, accuracy 87 %; PTX sensitivity 84 %, specificity 98 %, PPV 93 %, NPV 95 %, accuracy 95 %; HTX sensitivity 82 %, specificity 97 %, PPV 87 %, NPV 95 %, accuracy 94 %. The standard 4-views FAST examination showed a diagnostic accuracy of 91 % with a sensitivity of 75 %, specificity of 96 %, PPV of 81 % and NPV of 94 %. CONCLUSION: According to our results CA-FAST protocol proved to be a rapid bedside method, with good accuracy and high NPV in detection of ultrasonographic patterns suggestive of serious injury in trauma patients; moreover, the additional research of LCs did not cause a delay in the diagnosis. Ultrasonography should be used as initial investigation during the primary survey, sending to further diagnostic studies (CT scan) only those patients not clearly classified.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Protocolos Clínicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Evaluación Enfocada con Ecografía para Trauma , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Vertigo is generally due to a benign disorder, but it is the most common symptom associated with misdiagnosis of stroke. In this pilot study, we preliminarily assessed the diagnostic performance of a structured bedside algorithm to differentiate central from non-central acute vertigo (AV). Adult patients presenting to a single Emergency Department with vertigo were evaluated with STANDING (SponTAneous Nystagmus, Direction, head Impulse test, standiNG) by one of five trained emergency physicians or evaluated ordinarily by the rest of the medical staff (control group). The gold standard was a complete audiologic evaluation by a clinicians who are experts in assessing dizzy patients and neuroimaging. Reliability, sensibility and specificity of STANDING were calculated. Moreover, to evaluate the potential clinical impact of STANDING, neuroimaging and hospitalisation rates were compared with control group. A total of 292 patients were included, and 48 (16.4%) had a diagnosis of central AV. Ninety-eight (33.4%) patients were evaluated with STANDING. The test had good interobserver agreement (k = 0.76), with very high sensitivity (100%, 95%CI 72.3-100%) and specificity (94.3%, 95%CI 90.7-94.3%). Furthermore, hospitalisation and neuroimaging test rates were lower in the STANDING than in the control group (27.6% vs. 50.5% and 31.6% vs. 71.1%, respectively). In conclusion, STANDING seems to be a promising simple structured bedside algorithm that in this preliminary study identified central AV with a very high sensitivity, and was associated with significant reduction of neuroimaging and hospitalisation rates.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Postura , Vértigo/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Físico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We analyzed the efficacy of a point-of-care ultrasonographic protocol, based on a focused multiorgan examination, for the diagnostic process of symptomatic, non-traumatic hypotensive patients in the emergency department. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 108 adult patients complaining of non-traumatic symptomatic hypotension of uncertain etiology. Patients received immediate point-of-care ultrasonography to determine cardiac function and right/left ventricle diameter rate, inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility, pulmonary congestion, consolidations and sliding, abdominal free fluid and aortic aneurysm, and leg vein thrombosis. The organ-oriented diagnoses were combined to formulate an ultrasonographic hypothesis of the cause of hemodynamic instability. The ultrasonographic diagnosis was then compared with a final clinical diagnosis obtained by agreement of three independent expert physicians who performed a retrospective hospital chart review of each case. RESULTS: Considering the whole population, concordance between the point-of-care ultrasonography diagnosis and the final clinical diagnosis was interpreted as good, with Cohen's k = 0.710 (95 % CI, 0.614-0.806), p < 0.0001 and raw agreement (Ra) = 0.768. By eliminating the 13 cases where the final clinical diagnosis was not agreed upon (indefinite), the concordance increased to almost perfect, with k = 0.971 (95 % CI, 0.932-1.000), p < 0.0001 and Ra = 0.978. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency diagnostic judgments guided by point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography in patients presenting with undifferentiated hypotension significantly agreed with a final clinical diagnosis obtained by retrospective chart review. The integration of an ultrasonographic multiorgan protocol in the diagnostic process of undifferentiated hypotension has great potential in guiding the first-line therapeutic approach.
Asunto(s)
Hipotensión/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipotensión/etiología , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Choque/diagnóstico por imagen , Choque/etiología , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ecocardiografía , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Venas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, some prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have been proposed. We investigated whether the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) prognostic approaches result in different prognoses. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with acute PE were included. According to the ESC guidelines, high-risk patients were identified by the presence of shock/hypotension, intermediate-risk patients by elevated troponin I or right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by echocardiography, and low-risk patients by the absence of any of the above. In the PESI model, 11 clinical variables, easily accessible at the bedside, were used to generate three risk classes. The main outcomes were all-cause and PE-related in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-10.8) of 510 died. According to the ESC model, 40% were at low risk of short-term mortality, 54% at intermediate risk, and 6% at high risk. The distribution according to the PESI model was 31% (P < 0.05 vs. ESC), 49% and 20% (P < 0.05 vs. ESC), respectively. Mortality increased through the risk classes (P < 0.01), without significant differences between the models. The ESC model identified with higher accuracy than the PESI model both high-risk and low-risk patients (P < 0.05 for both). When patients with shock/hypotension were excluded, the PESI model stratified patients into classes with increasing PE-related mortality (0.7%, 4.3%, and 11.6%, P < 0.05). Troponin I and right ventricular dysfunction added incremental prognostic value to the PESI model, particularly in normotensive patients at intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: The ESC model showed higher accuracy than the PESI model in identifying high-risk and low-risk patients. In normotensive patients, the PESI model could guide clinical management as well as troponin I and echocardiography testing.