RESUMEN
Forty knees in 40 patients who had a chronic extensor mechanism disruption after knee arthroplasty underwent extensor mechanism allograft placement to restore extensor function. Thirteen knees were infected previously and 11 knees did not respond to previous attempts at direct extensor repair or reconstruction. Two patients died and two patients underwent above the knee amputation because of recurrent infection. The final group of 36 patients was studied for a mean followup of 3.6 years (range, 2-10 years). Clinical evaluations were performed using a modified Knee Society scoring system. The average range of motion in the entire group of patients was 1.4 degrees extension to 98 degrees flexion. The average extensor lag was 13 degrees in 15 of 36 patients. There were eight extensor allograft ruptures, which were treated by repeat extensor allograft placement. The average knee scores for function improved from 37 points preoperatively to 68 points postoperatively. Despite these initial ruptures, 34 of 36 patients had a successful clinical result. These results support the use of this technique for complete extensor mechanism loss after knee arthroplasty when direct repair is unfavorable.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Trasplante Óseo , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Tendones/trasplante , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiología , Masculino , Rótula/trasplante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Rotura Espontánea/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Tendones , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Excellent results have been reported with posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. A common complication relating to patellofemoral articulation is patellar clunk syndrome. Patellar clunk syndrome occurs when a fibrous nodule develops just proximal to the patellar button. At approximately 30 degrees to 45 degrees from full extension, the nodule catches the anterior flange of the femoral prosthesis, resulting in the clunk and a painful range of motion. The present study examines the use of arthroscopic debridement for this disorder. Thirty consecutive patients (32 knees) with the diagnosis of patellar clunk syndrome were evaluated at 1 year after arthroscopic debridement. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically according to the Knee Society score. In addition, patients were questioned specifically regarding anterior knee pain and patellofemoral symptoms. Radiographs were evaluated further regarding patella and component position. Patients were diagnosed with patellar clunk at an average of 12 months after their latest knee arthroplasty, with a range of 3 to 47 months. All patients complained of anterior knee pain and the clunk. All patients had a hypertrophic nodule at the junction of the proximal pole of the patella and quadriceps tendon and underwent arthroscopic debridement through a superolateral portal. All patients were free of patellar clunk postoperatively; one patient reported persistent anterior knee pain. Knee Society scores increased from an average of 64 points preoperative to 93 points postoperative. Radiographs showed patella alta in eight knees, patella baja in two. Four femoral components were in 5 degrees flexion. The present study represents the largest collection of data regarding patellar clunk syndrome. The data appear to support arthroscopic debridement as a successful treatment of patellar clunk syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroscopía , Desbridamiento , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Rótula , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , SonidoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: This study retrospectively, reviewed the effects of pedicle screw fixation on lumbosacral fusion for degenerative conditions. The records and radiographs of a group of patients treated by wide decompression and fusion of the lumbosacral spine and by one surgeon were studied. Two treatment groups were identified by fusion technique; one group received autologous bone graft only, and second group was treated by autologous bone grafting supplemented with pedicle screw fixation. OBJECTIVES: The two study groups were compared to determine the effects of pedicle screw fixation on lumbosacral fusion for degenerative conditions after wide decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reported success rate of lumbar and lumbosacral fusion in the literature is variable. Although several studies have reported high fusion rates with internal fixation, few controlled studies have been published. A critical review of isolated lumbosacral fusions (for degenerative conditions) and the effects of instrumentation is necessary to determine the effectiveness and complications associated with pedicle screw systems in this setting. METHODS: This study reviewed 215 consecutive patients operated on from 1987 to 1992 for degenerative conditions of the lumbosacral spine. Group 1 included 126 patients who underwent autogenous posterolateral bone graft after decompression. Group 2 included 89 patients treated with Edwards instrumentation and autogenous bone graft. Fusion status was determined via radiographs. Clinical results were based on pain relief after a minimum 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: In Group 1, an overall fusion rate of 65% was obtained. Clinically, 56% had good or excellent results. Complications included pseudarthroses (35%), dural tears (3.2%), and infection (2.4%). In Group 2, a fusion rate of 91% was achieved. In this group, 89% had a good or excellent clinical result. Complications included pseudarthroses (9%), dural tears (2.2%), and infection (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of pedicle screw and rod fixation with the Edwards system led to significantly improved results in lumbosacral fusions over autogenous bone graft alone, with a lower complication rate. The use of spinal is a valuable adjunct to achieve lumbosacral fusion in patients who have undergone decompressive surgery for the spine.