RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is now recognized as the most prevalent form of secondary hypertension globally, contributing significantly to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This umbrella review aims to systematically compare cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in PA patients undergoing adrenalectomy versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment, aiming to inform optimal management strategies. METHOD: Following PRISMA guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D386, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D387, a comprehensive search strategy was employed across multiple databases. Meta-analyses focusing on cardiovascular outcomes or all-cause mortality, comparing adrenalectomy and MRAs treatment in PA patients, were included. Studies were independently screened and assessed for quality using AMSTAR 2, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D388 and GRADE checklists. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Adrenalectomy showed potential benefits over MRAs in reducing the risk of arrhythmias (OR=2.17; 95% CI: 1.25-3.76) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.46). Patients treated with MRAs exhibited a higher risk of cardiovascular events (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), hypertension (OR=3.22; 95% CI: 1.15-8.97), and all-cause mortality (OR=3.03; 95% CI: 1.36-6.70) compared to adrenalectomy. CONCLUSION: Adrenalectomy appears to offer favorable outcomes compared to MRAs treatment in PA patients, particularly in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest the importance of considering surgical intervention as a primary treatment modality for PA.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present umbrella review aims to collate and summarize the findings from previous meta-analyses on the Triglyceride and Glucose (TyG) Index, providing insights to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers regarding the usefulness of this biomarker in various clinical settings. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 14, 2024, without language restrictions. The AMSTAR2 checklist assessed the methodological quality of the included meta-analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were finally included. The results revealed significant associations between the TyG index and various health outcomes. For kidney outcomes, a high TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.82-2.77) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.32-1.63). High TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (RR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.74-4.54), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.48-3.91), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.31-4.19). Regarding metabolic diseases, the TyG index was significantly higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57-1.15), metabolic syndrome (MD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.93), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.88-2.97) compared to those without these conditions. In cerebrovascular diseases, a higher TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of dementia (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.12-1.16), cognitive impairment (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.38-3.86), and ischemic stroke (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.22-1.54). For cardiovascular outcomes, the TyG index showed significant associations with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12-1.30), atrial fibrillation (AF) (SMD = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.57-1.87), and hypertension (HTN) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25-1.85). CONCLUSION: The TyG index is a promising biomarker for screening and predicting various medical conditions, particularly those related to insulin resistance and metabolic disorders. However, the heterogeneity and methodological quality of the included studies suggest the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings and refine the clinical utility of the TyG index.

Asunto(s)

Biomarcadores , Glucemia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Triglicéridos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Triglicéridos/sangre

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global health challenge, with a rising rate in line with other metabolic diseases. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of NAFLD in adult and pediatric populations. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to May 2023. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics, and random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Analyses were performed using STATA version 18. RESULTS: A total of 479 studies with 78,001,755 participants from 38 countries were finally included. The global prevalence of NAFLD was estimated to be 30.2% (95% CI: 28.7-31.7%). Regionally, the prevalence of NAFLD was as follows: Asia 30.9% (95% CI: 29.2-32.6%), Australia 16.1% (95% CI: 9.0-24.8%), Europe 30.2% (95% CI: 25.6-35.0%), North America 29% (95% CI: 25.8-32.3%), and South America 34% (95% CI: 16.9-53.5%). Countries with a higher human development index (HDI) had significantly lower prevalence of NAFLD (coefficient = -0.523, p = 0.005). Globally, the prevalence of NAFLD in men and women was 36.6% (95% CI: 34.7-38.4%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 23.9-27.1%), respectively. The prevalence of NAFLD in adults, adults with obesity, children, and children with obesity was 30.2% (95% CI: 28.8-31.7%), 57.5% (95% CI: 43.6-70.9%), 14.3% (95% CI: 10.3-18.8%), and 38.0% (95% CI: 31.5-44.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of NAFLD is remarkably high, particularly in countries with lower HDI. This substantial prevalence in both adults and children underscores the need for disease management protocols to reduce the burden.

Asunto(s)

Salud Global , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Niño , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Australia/epidemiología , Asia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore how probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics impact glycemic indices in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHOD: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception up to April 2023. The random-effects model was employed for the study analysis. Furthermore, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. AMSTAR2 checklist was used to determine the quality of studies. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3 was used for the study analysis. RESULT: A total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, gut microbial therapy could significantly decrease serum fasting blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (effect size: -0.211; 95 % CI: -0.257, -0.164; P < 0.001). Additionally, significant associations were also found between gut microbial therapy and improved serum levels of fasting insulin, glycated hemoglobin, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (effect size: -0.087; 95 % confidence interval: -0.120, -0.053; P < 0.001; effect size: -0.166; 95 % confidence interval: -0.200, -0.132; P < 0.001; effect size: -0.230; 95 % confidence interval: -0.288, -0.172; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed promising effects of gut microbiota modulation on glycemic profile of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The use of these agents as additional treatments can be considered.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure that has recently emerged as a treatment option for autonomous functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs), offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of RFA for AFTNs. METHOD: Global databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from 1990 until January 5, 2024, for studies on AFTNs undergoing RFA that presented volume reduction ratio (VRR) for at least one of 1, 3, 6 or 12 months post-operative follow-up with the results presented as means. The primary outcomes were VRR and TSH normalization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the cosmetic score, symptom score, and post-procedure complications. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochrane and I2 statistics, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024499932). RESULTS: A total of 10 eligible studies with a total sample size of 254 were included. The pooled VRR after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up post-treatment with RFA was 46.6% (95% CI: 40.3-52.9%), 62% (95% CI: 57.6-66.4%), 67.4% (95% CI:62.3-72.6%), and 77.2% (95% CI: 79.2-81.5%), respectively. The overall rate of TSH normalization was 76.4% (95% CI: 58.1-88.4%). Based on included studies the overall rate of subclinical hypothyroidism as one of the most important side effects of this method was 4% (95% CI: 1.9%-8.1%). CONCLUSION: RFA emerges as a promising non-surgical treatment for AFTNs, showing high rates of TSH normalization, tumor size reduction, and improved cosmetic and symptom scores. However, further research is needed to compare RFA with surgical methods and assess long-term outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability globally, with limited treatment options available for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is not only widespread but also a known risk factor for stroke. Our meta-analysis aims to assess the influence of pre-stroke metformin use on the clinical outcomes in AIS patients with T2DM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted this study following PRISMA guidelines, searching the following databases: Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 29, 2024. All studies providing separate data on AIS patients using metformin were included, and statistical analysis was conducted using R software to pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Out of 1051 studies, 7 met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis with a total of 11589 diabetic patients, including 5445 patients taking metformin and 6144 diabetic patients in the non-metformin group. Compared to the non-metformin group, the metformin group had a significantly higher rate of mRS 0-2 score at discharge (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.25:1.95; p=< 0.01) and a lower rate of 90-day mortality (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.42:0.61; p=< 0.01), with no significant difference in sICH (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47:1.64; p= 0.68) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that pre-stroke metformin use is associated with higher functional independence and lower mortality in AIS patients with T2DM.

Asunto(s)

Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglucemiantes , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Metformina , Humanos , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Recuperación de la Función , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estado Funcional

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations regarding the preferred preventive measures for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) are unclear, nor have we found any review articles addressing the combination of amiodarone and beta-blockers for the prevention of POAF. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combination beta-blockers and amiodarone in the prevention of POAF while also comparing the use of amiodarone and beta-blockers individually. METHODS: We used Pubmed as the primary resource. POAF incidence was the primary outcome of this study. The secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, treatment-related drug discontinuation (TRDD), and mortality. The random-effects model assessed all pooled outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The amiodarone subgroup of POAF incidence saw a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.81 [0.63, 1.06], p=0.12, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.63 [0.49, 0.80], p <0.001. TRDD for the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.68 [0.25, 1.82], p=0.44, while the combination subgroup saw a RR of 0.84 [0.57, 1.23], p=0.36. For mortality, the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.97 [0.48, 1.98], p=0.93, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 1.04 [0.27, 4.05], p=0.96. Both hospital and ICU LOS saw no significant difference between treatment arms for both the combination subgroup and amiodarone alone. Except for the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in the combination prophylaxis group, most of the measured outcomes did not meet the optimized information size (OIS) that was estimated. CONCLUSION: Combination prophylaxis with amiodarone and beta-blockers significantly lowered risks of POAF incidence in comparison to beta-blockers alone while also having comparative mortality and TRDD outcomes.