RESUMEN
We report a 46-year-old male patient with retinocytoma who presented at the age of 31 asymptomatically. An intraocular retinal mass was incidentally found in his right eye, when he underwent ophthalmological assessment for refractive surgery. This tumor consisted of a calcified sessile basis partially covered by a pedunculated salmon-pink growth. Initially, the tumor was diagnosed as a retinocytoma with clinical suspicion of malignant transformation into retinoblastoma and treated by four sessions of laser photocoagulation. Six and a half years later, the tumor relapsed, and he was treated with a Ruthenium plaque. Following brachytherapy, he had two episodes of right-sided vitreous hemorrhage that spontaneously cleared up, and the remaining finding in the vitreous cavity was interpreted as asteroid hyalosis. He underwent vitrectomy about five years following brachytherapy. The analysis of the vitreous material revealed the presence of inactive vitreous seeds composed of small round blue cells, compatible with a type 2 regression.
RESUMEN
Intraocular medulloepithelioma is a rare embryonal tumor that is believed to arise from the epithelium of the medullary tube. We report a 37-year-old female with medulloepithelioma presented at the age of 17 with a one-month history of left-sided visual deterioration and visible iris lesion. Birth history and medical and family histories were insignificant. The left eye revealed a vascularized iris mass. Further examination revealed a grey-white ciliary body mass and a subluxated lens with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.5. The patient underwent partial lamellar corneo-sclerouvectomy. The histological and electron microscopic findings revealed medulloepithelioma. To reduce the risk of recurrence of the probable malignant tumor, she was treated with Ruthenium plaque therapy about six weeks following surgical removal. Pars plana vitrectomy and lensectomy with laser photocoagulation of the peripheral retina were performed at the removal of the brachytherapy plaque. She regained her BCVA of 1.0 in her left eye 3.5 months following pars plana vitrectomy. At 20-year follow-up, no tumor recurrence was seen and her BCVA remained 1.0.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy frequently causes severe allergic reactions. Diagnosis includes detection of IgE to peanuts in serum or by skin prick tests. While children may have allergic sensitization without having clinical peanut allergy, oral peanut challenge is often required for accurate diagnosis. The conjunctival provocation test is used for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment effect in inhalant allergies, but it has not been evaluated as a tool for diagnosing peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the conjunctival provocation tests may be feasible, accurate and safe in diagnosing clinically relevant peanut allergy in patients with suspected peanut allergy. METHODS: This cross-sectional case-control study in children with clinical or laboratory suspected peanut allergy included 102 children recruited from the regional paediatric departments and specialist practices during one year from April 2011. A peanut-tolerant control group of 28 children of similar age was recruited locally. A double-blind placebo-controlled conjunctival provocation test with peanut extract was performed in all children, while oral peanut provocation was performed as double-blind placebo-controlled challenge in children with suspected peanut allergy and as an open challenge in the control children. RESULTS: All 81 children with a positive double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge (OFC) also had a positive conjunctival provocation test. None of the children with negative conjunctival provocation test had a positive OFC. The sensitivity and the specificity of the conjunctival provocation test were 0.96 and 0.83, respectively. No children had severe adverse reaction caused by the conjunctival provocation test, whereas 23 children suffered an anaphylactic reaction to the OFC. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Conjunctival allergen challenge appears to be feasible, accurate and safe in diagnosing children referred for suspected peanut allergy.