RESUMEN
Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP) is a benign tumor originating from primitive respiratory epithelium which tends to present as an asymptomatic solitary lesion in the periphery of the lung. It primarily occurs in women, with a 5:1 ratio of female to male, and in East Asian populations. We describe a rare case of a gallium-68 (68Ga)-DOTATATE avid PSP in a middle-aged man of North African ancestry. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed an enhancing ovoid 2-cm solid lesion within the periphery of the left upper lobe abutting the superior portion of the lateral left ventricular wall. A fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) demonstrated low-level FDG uptake, but a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed avid tracer uptake, concerning for a carcinoid tumor. The lesion was surgically excised, and the histopathologic analysis revealed the typical morphologic and histochemical markers of a PSP. We conclude that, although rare, PSP can be a differential consideration when evaluating a 68Ga-DOTATATE-avid solitary lung nodule concerning for carcinoid tumor, in all genders and in ethnicities other than East Asian.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos Organometálicos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Radioisótopos de Galio , Humanos , Pulmón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To survey the status quo of ancillary staffing in predominantly hospital-based interventional radiology (IR) suites and to assess interventional radiologist attitudes toward current IR procedure room staffing availability and appropriateness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an online survey composed of 26 questions focused on levels of IR suite ancillary staffing as well as operators' opinions of current IR procedure room staffing were sent via email to 2,284 active Society of Interventional Radiology members. RESULTS: There were 777 survey responses. Nurse staffing count per IR room was at least one in 90% (n = 699) during regular hours and 93.6% (n = 730) during off-hours, respectively. A second technologist was frequently used during regular hours and, to a lesser extent, during on-call hours (n = 341 [43.9%] and n = 122 [15.7%]), respectively. Ten and 15% of IR respondents believe staffing support is inadequate for most interventional procedures requiring moderate sedation during normal business hours and off-hours/weekends, respectively, and 69% and 56% of IR respondents believe anesthesia support is inadequate during normal business hours and during off-hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of technologists used per IR suite varies across practices and frequently exceeds that of earlier American College of Radiology recommendations, whereas use of IR suite nurse staffing is consistent with approximately one per suite and constant. However, there is dissatisfaction among surveyed interventional radiologists with availability and appropriateness of staffing of the IR procedure room, particularly during on-call hours and weekends, as well as with anesthesia support for emergent cases. No evidence-based guidelines for staffing the IR suite currently exist. This underscores the need for further investigation with the ultimate goal of creating such guidelines.