RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for movement disorders that comprises implantation of stimulation electrodes and a pacemaker. These procedures can be performed separately, leaving the possibility of externalizing the electrodes for local field potential recording or testing multiple targets for therapeutic efficacy. It is still debated whether the temporary externalization of DBS electrodes leads to an increased risk of infection. We therefore aimed to assess the risk of infection during and after lead externalization in DBS surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a consecutive series of 624 DBS surgeries, including 266 instances with temporary externalization of DBS electrodes for a mean of 6.1 days. Patients were available for follow-up of at least one year, except in 15 instances. In 14 patients with negative test stimulation, electrodes were removed. All kinds of infections related to implantation of the neurostimulation system were accounted for. RESULTS: Overall, infections occurred in 22 of 624 surgeries (3.5%). Without externalization of electrodes, infections were noted after 7 of 358 surgeries (2.0%), whereas with externalization, 15 of 252 infections were found (6.0%). This difference was significant (p = 0.01), but it did not reach statistical significance when comparing groups within different diagnoses. The rate of infection with externalized electrodes was highest in psychiatric disorders (9.1%), followed by Parkinson's disease (7.3%), pain (5.7%), and dystonia (5.5%). The duration of the externalization of the DBS electrodes was comparable in patients who developed an infection (6.1 ± 3.1 days) with duration in those who did not (6.0 ± 3.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: Although infection rates were relatively low in our study, there was a slightly higher infection rate when DBS electrodes were externalized. On the basis of our results, the indication for electrode externalization should be carefully considered, and patients should be informed about the possibility of a higher infection risk when externalization of DBS electrodes is planned.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Functional stereotactic neurosurgery including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and radiofrequency lesioning is well established and widely used for treatment of movement disorders and various other neurological and psychiatric diseases. Although functional stereotactic neurosurgery procedures are considered relatively safe, intracranial hemorrhage resulting in permanent neurological deficits may occur in 1%-3% of patients. Microelectrode recording (MER) has been recognized as a valuable tool for refining the final target in functional stereotactic neurosurgery. Moreover, MER provides insight into the underlying neurophysiological pathomechanisms of movement disorders and other diseases. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing controversy on whether MER increases the risk for hemorrhage. The authors aimed to compare the risk of hemorrhage in functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures with regard to the use of MER. METHODS: The authors performed a comparative analysis on a consecutive series of 645 functional neurosurgery procedures, including 624 DBS surgeries and 21 radiofrequency lesionings, to evaluate whether the use of MER would increase the risk for hemorrhage. MER was performed in 396 procedures, while no MER was used in 249 cases. The MER technique involved the use of a guiding cannula and a single trajectory when feasible. Postoperative CT scans were obtained within 24 hours after surgery in all patients and screened for the presence of hemorrhage. RESULTS: Twenty-one intracranial hemorrhages were detected on the postoperative CT scans (3.2%). Of the 21 intracranial hemorrhages, 14 were asymptomatic and 7 were symptomatic. Symptoms were transient except in 1 case. There was no statistically significant correlation between hemorrhage and the use of MER at any site (subdural, ventricle, trajectory, target, whether asymptomatic or symptomatic). There were 4 cases of symptomatic hemorrhage in the MER group (1%) and 3 cases in those without MER (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative MER did not increase the overall risk of hemorrhage in the authors' experience using primarily a single MER trajectory and a guiding cannula.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has advanced tremendously, for both clinical applications and technology. Although DBS surgery is an overall safe procedure, rare side effects, in particular, hemorrhage, may result in devastating consequences. Although there are certain advantages with transventricular trajectories, it has been reasoned that avoidance of such trajectories would likely reduce hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible impact of a transventricular trajectory as compared with a transcerebral approach on the occurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic hemorrhage after DBS electrode placement. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 624 DBS surgeries in 582 patients, who underwent DBS surgery for movement disorders, chronic pain, or psychiatric disorders. A stereotactic guiding cannula was routinely used for DBS electrode insertion. All patients had postoperative computed tomography scans within 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Transventricular transgression was identified in 404/624 DBS surgeries. The frequency of hemorrhage was slightly higher in transventricular than in transcerebral DBS surgeries (15/404, 3.7% vs 6/220, 2.7%). While 7/15 patients in the transventricular DBS surgery group had a hemorrhage located in the ventricle, 6 had an intracerebral hemorrhage along the electrode trajectory unrelated to transgression of the ventricle and 2 had a subdural hematoma. Among the 7 patients with a hemorrhage located in the ventricle, only one became symptomatic. Overall, a total of 7/404 patients in the transventricular DBS surgery group had a symptomatic hemorrhage, whereas the hemorrhage remained asymptomatic in all 6/220 patients in the transcerebral DBS surgery group. CONCLUSION: Transventricular approaches in DBS surgery can be performed safely, in general, when special precautions such as using a guiding cannula are routinely applied.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: Tardive dystonia/dyskinesia (TDD) occurs as a side effect of anti-dopaminergic drugs, including metoclopramide, and is often refractory to medication. While pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an accepted treatment for TDD secondary to neuroleptic medication, there is much less knowledge about its effects on metoclopramide-induced TDD. Methods: We present the case of a woman with metoclopramide-induced TDD, whose symptoms were initially misjudged as "functional." After 8 years of ineffective medical treatments, she received bilateral implantation of quadripolar electrodes into the posteroventral lateral globus pallidus internus (GPi). Results: GPi DBS led to significant symptom reduction [Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score 24/44 at admission and 7/44 at discharge]. Chronic stimulation led to full recovery from TDD symptoms 9 years after surgery. The BFMDRS motor score decreased to 0.5 (98% improvement). Discussion: Pallidal DBS may result in sustained improvement of TDD secondary to chronic metoclopramide intake in the long term.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rechargeable implantable pulse generator (IPG) technology has several advantages over non-rechargeable systems and is routinely used now in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Little is known about the occasional need and the circumstances for switching back to non-rechargeable technology. CASES: Out of a cohort of 640 patients, 102 patients received a rechargeable IPG at first implantation or at the time of replacement surgery. Out of these, 3 patients underwent preemptive replacement with non-rechargeable devices for the following reasons: dissatisfaction with handling and recharge frequency (pallidal DBS in advanced Parkinson's disease/dystonia), severe DBS OFF status subsequent to missed recharging (subthalamic DBS in Parkinson's disease) and twiddler's syndrome (nucleus accumbens DBS in alcohol dependency). CONCLUSIONS: Although rechargeable IPG technology has been received well and is used widely, there are unexpected scenarios that require replacement surgery with non-rechargeable IPGs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many depressed patients do not achieve response or remission despite adequate treatment. Identifying predictors of outcome can contribute to developing therapeutic algorithms for difficult-to-treat depression. Therefore, we examined clinical predictors of response and remission in a naturalistic inpatient sample undergoing multimodal treatment for depression. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-one consecutive inpatients admitted to a tertiary care university hospital (specialized psychiatry unit for treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression) between January 2014 and December 2016 were characterized by a set of sociodemographic and clinical variables. The predictive value of these variables for response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score) and remission (MADRS score at discharge < 10) were explored using bivariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Greater symptom severity and fewer psychotropic medications at the time of admission predicted response. Remission rates were higher for patients with non-chronic depression, higher number of previous depressive episodes, fewer psychotropic medications and less severe depression at admission. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study without a control group. The sample was drawn from a single inpatient ward specialized for difficult-to-treat depression. CONCLUSIONS: Greater baseline depression severity might be a proxy for a less chronic course of depression thereby explaining its association with greater response rates. Fewer episodes in the past and polypharmacy could indicate treatment-resistance and chronicity, contributing to lower remission rates. Therefore, preventing chronicity should be a central aim of depression treatment.

Asunto(s)