RESUMEN

Bone defect assessment in primary advanced knee arthritis can present a challenge for the surgeon and lead to unfavourable outcomes if not adequately determined during preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to introduce a new, simple and quick way to assess and quantify bone defect using short film radiographs and utilising it to choose the total knee prosthesis. This is a prospective case series of patients who underwent TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) using various types of prostheses. Three different angles - Tibiofemoral angle, MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), and JLCA (joint line convergence angle) - were measured preoperatively to evaluate limb alignment, placement of the tibial, and femoral components of total knee prosthesis. Postoperatively roentgenographic index introduced by Lotke et al was used to assess our preoperative methodology. The American knee society score was used pre- and postoperatively up to one year. A total of eight knees of six patients were analysed (four males, two females). The mean age of the patients was 57.75±5.701 years. All the knees were in varying degrees of varus deformity preoperatively. The accuracy of the preoperatively used radiological angles was analysed by postoperative measurement of tibiofemoral angle (d), tibial anatomical axis (b) and femoral anatomical axis (a), and Roentgenographic index as suggested by Lotke et al. Postoperatively, all the knees were in valgus with tibiofemoral angle (d) 6.50±0.926, tibial component alignment (b) mean was 89±1.195, and femoral component alignment (a) mean was 5.13±0.991 valgus. Mean roentgenographic index was 89.38±3.292. American knee society score improved at one-year follow-up postoperatively and was statistically significant with p<0.001. In this study, a new classification for bone defects in primary arthritic knees by utilising simple plain radiograph short films and as a guide for implant selection is proposed.

Asunto(s)

Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two-dose regime with a three-dose regime of cefuroxime in the prevention of post-operative wound infection in hip surgery patients and to determine the most effective regime of antibiotic prophylaxis for such patients. METHODS: The prospective, comparative, multi-centre cohort study was conducted from January 1998 to June 1998 at Dundee Royal Infirmary and attached district hospitals (Stirling Royal Infirmary and Falkirk Royal Infirmary). It comprised patients who had hip surgery i.e. fracture fixation, hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Patients were assigned to two groups. Group A patients received cefuroxime 750mg at induction of anaesthesia and 750mg at the end of the procedure, while Group B patients received 1.5gm of cefuroxime at the induction of anaesthesia, followed by 750mg 8 and 16 hours after the operation. Patients were assessed post-operatively daily according to the ASEPSIS wound scoring system during the hospital stay. RESULTS: There were 280 patients in the study, with 140(50%) in each of the two groups. In Group A 60(43%) patients required fracture fixation, the rate of wound infection was 2(3.3%), 40(28.5%) required hemiarthroplasty and the rate of wound infection was 1(2.5%) and 40(28.5%) required total hip replacement and the rate of wound infection was zero. In Group B, the corresponding numbers were 1/60 (1.6%), 1/40 (2.5%) and zero. No evidence of minor, moderate or severe wound infection was observed in 272(97%) patients regardless of the group. The most frequent pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus in 3(1%) patients and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 2(0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of wound infection between the patients who had received two or three doses of cefuroxime.