Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Toxicology ; 463: 152983, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627991

RESUMEN

This paper assessed the potential of trans-placental and -lactational genotoxicity and oxidative stress induction of tembotrione, a naturally derived allelopathic herbicide. Several treatment protocols were applied to measure primary DNA damage by alkaline comet assay in leucocytes and liver. To address the oxidative stress induction, TBARS, ROS, SOD, CA, GSH-Px activity were recorded. The dams were treated from the first gestation day and pups sacrificed after birth. The second treatment protocol comprised treating the dams during gestation and lactation and sacrificing the pups at weaning. The third group of pups comprised offspring of dams that were treated in gestation and lactation and sacrificed in puberty. To address translactational genotoxicity, dams were treated in lactation only. Dams treated in gestation and lactation were sacrificed after reentering the estrous cycle and analyzed for DNA damage and oxidative stress. Tembotrione doses encountered in everyday human exposure, as estimated by the EFSA, were applied in dam treatment in consecutive days (ADI: 0.0004 mg/kg b.w./day, AOEL: 0.0007 mg/kg b.w./day, 1/500 LD50 4.0 mg/kg b.w./day). Although we observed mitigated DNA integrity at the dose of 4.0 mg/kg/b.w./day in female pubertal rats, we can conclude that at the conditions employed in the study low doses of tembotrione do not pose a risk for DNA damage of the offspring of treated dams. Contrary to this, the highest dose significantly affected all the oxidative stress parameters in the liver and plasma of pubertal females, CAT and GSH-Px in the liver of males and ROS and CAT of dams.


Asunto(s)
Ciclohexanonas/toxicidad , Daño del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Sulfonas/toxicidad , Animales , Ensayo Cometa , Ciclohexanonas/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Herbicidas/administración & dosificación , Lactancia , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/patología , Masculino , Placenta/metabolismo , Embarazo , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación
2.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 60(1): 72-84, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30264469

RESUMEN

Chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and α-cypermethrin are some of the most widely used insecticides in contemporary agriculture. However, their low-dose, nontarget genotoxic effects have not been extensively assayed. As one of the most relevant cancer biomarkers, we aimed to assess the aneuploidy due to chromosome missegregation during mitosis. To aim it we treated human lymphocytes in vitro with three concentrations of insecticides equivalents relevant for real scenario exposure assessed by regulatory agencies. We focused on chlorpyrifos as conventional and imidacloprid and α-cypermethrin as sustainable use insecticides. Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay was performed coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with directly labeled pancentromeric probes for chromosomes 9, 18, X and Y. None of the insecticides induced significant secondary DNA damage in terms of micronuclei (MN), nuclear buds (NB), or nucleoplasmic bridges (NPB). However, significant disbalances in chromosomes 9, 18, X and Y, and in insecticide-treated cells has been observed. According to recent studies, these disbalances in chromosome numbers may be atributted to defect sister chromatid cohesion which contribute to the increase of chromosome missegregation but not to micronuclei incidence. We conclude that tested insecticidal active substances exert chromosome missegregation effects at low concentrations, possibly by mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion. These findings may contribute to future risk assesments and understanding of insecticide mode of action on human genome. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:72-84, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Cloropirifos/toxicidad , Aberraciones Cromosómicas/inducido químicamente , Segregación Cromosómica/efectos de los fármacos , Daño del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Insecticidas/toxicidad , Neonicotinoides/toxicidad , Nitrocompuestos/toxicidad , Piretrinas/toxicidad , Segregación Cromosómica/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18/efectos de los fármacos , Cromosomas Humanos Par 9/efectos de los fármacos , Cromosomas Humanos X/efectos de los fármacos , Cromosomas Humanos Y/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Linfocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Micronúcleos
3.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol ; 69(2): 86-102, 2018 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29990301

RESUMEN

Humans have used insecticides since ancient times. The spectrum and potency of available insecticidal substances has greatly expanded since the industrial revolution, resulting in widespread use and unforeseen levels of synthetic chemicals in the environment. Concerns about the toxic effects of these new chemicals on non-target species became public soon after their appearance, which eventually led to the restrictions of use. At the same time, new, more environmentally-friendly insecticides have been developed, based on naturally occurring chemicals, such as pyrethroids (derivatives of pyrethrin), neonicotinoids (derivatives of nicotine), and insecticides based on the neem tree vegetable oil (Azadirachta indica), predominantly azadirachtin. Although these new substances are more selective toward pest insects, they can still target other organisms. Neonicotinoids, for example, have been implicated in the decline of the bee population worldwide. This review summarises recent literature published on non-target toxicity of neonicotinoids, pyrethroids, and neem-based insecticidal substances, with a special emphasis on neonicotinoid toxicity in honeybees. We also touch upon the effects of pesticide combinations and documented human exposure to these substances.


Asunto(s)
Abejas/efectos de los fármacos , Insecticidas/toxicidad , Limoninas/toxicidad , Neonicotinoides/toxicidad , Aceites de Plantas/toxicidad , Piretrinas/toxicidad , Animales , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales
4.
J Antibiot (Tokyo) ; 69(9): 689-96, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26883392

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most commonly isolated microbes in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that can be complicated due to the formation of a staphylococcal biofilm. In this study, we investigated antimicrobial efficacy of single mupirocin and three types of monoterpenes (thymol, menthol and 1,8-cineole) as well as mupirocin-monoterpene combinations against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and 5 methicilin-resistant S. aureus strains (MRSA) grown in planktonic and biofilm form. MIC against planktonic bacteria as well as minimum biofilm-eliminating concentrations (MBECs) and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) were determined by TTC and MTT reduction assay, respectively. The MICs of mupirocin (0.125-0.156 µg ml(-1)) were three orders of magnitude lower than the MICs of monoterpenes, which were as follows: thymol (0.250-0.375 mg ml(-1)) > menthol (1 mg ml(-1)) > 1,8-cineole (4-8 mg ml(-1)). Mupirocin-monoterpene combinations showed indifferent effect as compared with MICs of single substances. Mupirocin (0.016-2 mg ml(-1)) failed to destroy the biofilm. The MBECs of thymol and menthol were two- to sixfold higher than their MICs, while 1,8-cineole exerted a weak antibiofilm effect with MBECs 16- to 64-fold higher than MICs. Mixture of mupirocin and 1,8 cineole exerted a potentiated biofilm-eliminating effect, mupirocin-menthol showed antagonism, while effect of thymol-mupirocin mixture was inconclusive. MBICs of antimicrobials were close to their MICs, except 1,8-cineole, MBIC was about three- to fivefold higher. Dominant synergy was observed for mixtures of mupirocin and menthol or thymol, whereas mupirocin-1,8-cineol exerted an indifferent or additive biofilm inhibitory effect. Particular combinations of mupirocin and the monoterpenes could be applied in CRS therapy in order to eliminate or prevent bacterial biofilm growth.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclohexanoles/farmacología , Monoterpenos/farmacología , Mupirocina/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ciclohexanoles/administración & dosificación , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Eucaliptol , Mentol/administración & dosificación , Mentol/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Monoterpenos/administración & dosificación , Mupirocina/administración & dosificación , Plancton/efectos de los fármacos , Timol/administración & dosificación , Timol/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA