RESUMEN
Introduction: Neuropsychological assessment forms an integral part of the presurgical evaluation for patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy. Our understanding of cognitive impairment in epilepsy is based on seminal lesional studies that have demonstrated important structure-function relationships within the brain. However, a growing body of literature demonstrating heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of patients with focal epilepsy (e.g., temporal lobe epilepsy; TLE) has led researchers to speculate that cognition may be impacted by regions outside the seizure onset zone, such as those involved in the interictal or "irritative" network. Methods: Neuropsychological data from 48 patients who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) monitoring between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed. Patients were categorized based on the site of seizure onset, as well as their irritative network, to determine the impact of wider network activity on cognition. Neuropsychological data were compared with normative standards (i.e., z = 0), and between groups. Results: There were very few distinguishing cognitive features between patients when categorized based purely on the seizure onset zone (i.e., frontal lobe vs. temporal lobe epilepsy). In contrast, patients with localized irritative networks (i.e., frontal or temporal interictal epileptiform discharges [IEDs]) demonstrated more circumscribed profiles of impairment compared with those demonstrating wider irritative networks (i.e., frontotemporal IEDs). Furthermore, the directionality of propagation within the irritative network was found to influence the manifestations of cognitive impairment. Discussion: The findings suggest that neuropsychological assessment is sensitive to network activity beyond the site of seizure onset. As such, an overly focal interpretation may not accurately reflect the distribution of the underlying pathology. This has important implications for presurgical work-up in epilepsy, as well as subsequent surgical outcomes.
RESUMEN
Episodic memory deficits are a common consequence of aging and are associated with a number of neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease). Given the importance of episodic memory, a great deal of research has investigated how we can improve memory performance. Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) represents a promising tool for memory enhancement but the optimal stimulation parameters that reliably boost memory are yet to be determined. In our double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled study, 42 healthy adults (36 females; 23.3 ± 7.7 years of age) received anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and sham stimulation during a list-learning task, over three separate sessions. Stimulation was applied over the left temporal lobe, as encoding and recall of information is typically associated with mesial temporal lobe structures (e.g., the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex). We measured word recall within each stimulation session, as well as the average number of intrusion and repetition errors. In terms of word recall, participants recalled fewer words during tDCS and tACS, compared to sham stimulation, and significantly fewer words recalled during tACS compared with tDCS. Significantly more memory errors were also made during tACS compared with sham stimulation. Overall, our findings suggest that TES has a deleterious effect on memory processes when applied to the left temporal lobe.
Asunto(s)
Memoria Episódica , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Aprendizaje/fisiología , Recuerdo Mental/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Objective: To prospectively study the cingulate cortex for the localization and role of the grasping action in humans during electrical stimulation of depth electrodes. Methods: All the patients (n = 23) with intractable focal epilepsy and a depth electrode stereotactically placed in the cingulate cortex, as part of their pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation from 2015 to 2017, were included. Cortical stimulation was performed and examined for grasping actions. Post-implantation volumetric T1 MRIs were co-registered to determine the exact electrode position. Results: Five patients (male: female 4:1; median age 31) exhibited contralateral grasping actions during electrical stimulation. All patients had electrodes implanted in the ventral bank of the right cingulate sulcus adjacent to the vertical anterior commissure (VAC) line. Stimulation of other electrodes in adjacent regions did not elicit grasping. Conclusion: Grasping action elicited from a localized region in the mid-cingulate cortex (MCC) directly supports the concept of the cingulate cortex being crucially involved in the grasping network. This opens an opportunity to explore this region with deep brain stimulation as a motor neuromodulation target for treatment in specific movement disorders or neurorehabilitation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Smartphone-based cognitive assessment measures allow efficient, rapid, and convenient collection of cognitive datasets. Establishment of feasibility and validity is essential for the widespread use of this approach. We describe a novel smartphone application (HD-Mobile) that includes three performance-based cognitive tasks with four key outcome measures, for use with Huntington's disease (HD) samples. We describe known groups and concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity, and feasibility properties of the tasks. METHODS: Forty-two HD CAG-expanded participants (20 manifest, 22 premanifest) and 28 healthy controls completed HD-Mobile cognitive tasks three times across an 8-day period, on days 1, 4, and 8. A subsample of participants had pen-and-paper cognitive task data available from their most recent assessment from their participation in a separate observational longitudinal study, Enroll-HD. RESULTS: Manifest-HD participants performed worse than healthy controls for three of four HD-Mobile cognitive measures, and worse than premanifest-HD participants for two of four measures. We found robust test-retest reliability for manifest-HD participants (ICC = 0.71-0.96) and with some exceptions, in premanifest-HD (ICC = 0.52-0.96) and healthy controls (0.54-0.96). Correlations between HD-Mobile and selected Enroll-HD cognitive tasks were mostly medium to strong (r = 0.36-0.68) as were correlations between HD-Mobile cognitive tasks and measures of expected disease progression and motor symptoms for the HD CAG-expanded participants (r = - 0.34 to - 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated robust known-groups, test-retest, concurrent validity, and sensitivity of HD-Mobile cognitive tasks. The study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of HD-Mobile for conducting convenient, frequent, and potentially ongoing assessment of HD samples without the need for in-person assessment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Huntington , Cognición , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Enfermedad de Huntington/complicaciones , Estudios Longitudinales , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Teléfono InteligenteRESUMEN
Delay discounting requires computing trade-offs between immediate-small rewards and later-larger rewards. Negative and positive emotions shift decisions towards more or less impulsive responses, respectively. Models have conceptualized this trade-off by describing an interplay between "emotional" and "rational" processes, with the former involved during immediate choices and relying on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and the latter involved in long-term choices and relying on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Whether stimulation of the vmPFC modulates emotion-induced delay discounting remains unclear. We applied tDCS over the vmPFC in 20 healthy individuals during a delay discounting task following an emotional (positive, negative) or neutral induction. Our results showed that cathodal tDCS increased impulsivity after positive emotions in high impulsivity trials. For low impulsivity trials, anodal tDCS decreased impulsivity following neutral induction compared with emotional induction. Our findings demonstrate that the vmPFC integrates reward and emotion most prominently in situations of increased impulsivity, whereas when higher cognitive control is required the vmPFC appears to be less engaged, possibly due to recruitment of the dlPFC. Understanding how stimulation and emotion influence decision-making at the behavioural and neural levels holds promise to develop interventions to reduce impulsivity.