RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Waist circumferences (WC) >/=94 cm for men and >/=80 cm for women (action level I) and >/=102 cm for men and >/=88 cm for women (action level II) have been suggested as limits for health promotion purposes to alert the general public to the need for weight loss. In this analysis we examined the ability of the above cut-off points to correctly identify subjects with or without hypertension in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St Lucia and Barbados. We also determined population- and gender-specific abdominal adiposity cut-off points for epidemiological identification of risk of hypertension. METHODS: Waist measurement was made at the narrowest part of the torso as seen from the front or at midpoint between the bottom of the rib cage and 2 cm above the top of the iliac crest. Sensitivity and specificity of the established WC cut-off points for hypertension were compared across sites. With receiver operating characteristics (ROC), population- and gender-specific cut-off points associated with risk of hypertension were determined over the entire range of WC values. RESULTS: Predictive abilities of the established WC cut-off points for hypertension were poor compared to the specific cut-off points estimated for each population. Different values of WC were associated with increased risk of hypertension in these populations. In men, WC cut-off points of 76, 81, 80, 83 and 87 cm provided the highest sensitivity for identifying hypertensives in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St Lucia and Barbados, respectively. The analogous cut-off points in women were 72, 82, 85, 86 and 88 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The waist cut-off points from this study represent values for epidemiological identification of risk of hypertension. For the purpose of health promotion, the decision on what cut-off points to use must be made by considering other additional factors including overall impact on health due to intervention (e.g. weight reduction) and potential burden on health services if a low cut-off point is employed. There is a need to develop abdominal adiposity cut-off points associated with increased risks for cardiovascular diseases in different societies, especially for those populations where the distribution of obesity and associated risk factors tends to be very different from those of the technologically advanced nations. International Journal of Obesity (2000) 24, 180-186
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Composición Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Promoción de la Salud , Hipertensión/genética , Obesidad/genética , Abdomen , Adulto , África Occidental/epidemiología , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Antropometría , Área Bajo la Curva , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Distribución por Sexo , Indias Occidentales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to examine the prevalence of abdominal adiposity and its association with the prevalence of hypertension among African descent populations in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St. Lucia, Barbados, and the United States (US). RESEARCH METHOD: The data for this investigation were obtained from the International Collaborative Study on Hypertension in Blacks. Hypertension was defined as mean diastolic blood pressure > or =90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg or current treatment with prescribed anti-hypertension medication. Abdominal overweight was defined as waist circumference (WC) > or =94 and > or =80 cm for men and women, respectively. Abdominal obesity was defined as WC > or =102 and > or =88 cm for men and women, respectively. We estimated the site-specific prevalence of abdominal overweight and obesity across age and body mass index cut-points. We also calculated the population attributable fraction (AF) of hypertension due to abdominal adiposity. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension in these populations was tightly linked to abdominal adiposity. Increases in abdominal overweight accompanied an increasing degree of Westernization, rising from 6.4% and 26.3% in Nigeria, 16.5% and 62.8% in Cameroon, 15.8% and 58.6% in Jamaica, 14.3% and 62.1% in St. Lucia, 21.4% and 70.3% in Barbados to 38.9%, and 76.4% in the US for men and women, respectively. The corresponding values for abdominal obesity were 1.6% and 12.3% in Nigeria, 5.1% and 38.9% in Cameroon, 5.5% and 34.0% in Jamaica, 2.7% and 40.7% in St. Lucia, 7.8% and 44.7% in Barbados to 21.7% and 54.1% in the US for men and women, respectively. Body mass index-adjusted estimates of AF suggest that in most of these populations, especially in females, avoidance of abdominal overweight or obesity would help to curb the development of hypertension. DISCUSSION: An important public health challenge is to clarify how lifestyle factors influence risks of abdominal adiposity and ultimately the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.