RESUMEN
Background The use of Emergency Department Observation Units (EDOUs) to treat patients with a variety of complaints has grown over recent years. However, the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries in EDOUs is infrequently described. Our study sought to describe the feasibility of treating patients with blunt thoracic trauma in an EDOU in consultation with our trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) team. Together, our Emergency Department (ED) and TACS teams designed a protocol for the treatment of patients with specific blunt thoracic injuries (fewer than three rib fractures, nondisplaced sternal fractures) that we felt would require less than 24 hours of care in a hospital setting. Methods This study is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis comparing two groups before (pre-EDOU) and after (EDOU) the creation of the EDOU protocol, which was implemented in August 2020. Data was collected at a single, Level 1 trauma center with approximately 95,000 annual visits. Similar inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select patients in both groups. We conducted two-sample t-tests and Chi-square testing to assess for significance. Primary outcomes include length of stay and bounce-back rate. Results A total of 81 patients were included in our data set across both groups. Forty-three patients were included in our pre-EDOU group while 38 patients were treated in our EDOU once the protocol was implemented. Patients in both groups were of similar age, gender and had similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) ranging from 9 to 14. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the EDOU group (31.5 hours) compared to the pre-EDOU group (36.4 hours) although not statistically significant. When risk stratified by ISS, hospital length of stay did reach statistical significance and was found to be shorter for patients with ISS scores greater than or equal to 9 that were treated in the EDOU (29.1 hours vs. 43.8 hours, p = .028). Both groups had one patient each bounce back for repeat evaluation and additional care. Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential use of EDOUs to treat patients with mild to moderate blunt thoracic injuries. The availability of trauma surgeons for consultation along with ED provider experience may be rate-limiting steps in utilizing observation units to care for trauma patients. Additional research with more participants is needed to determine the impact of implementing such a practice at other institutions.
RESUMEN
Background Hospital overcrowding and operating above capacity have occurred frequently throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Both phenomena can lead to worsened patient outcomes; thus, it is imperative to find solutions that tackle both. Our goal was to create a treatment protocol for a subset of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 infection that would combat inpatient overcrowding by diverting these patients to an emergency department (ED) observation unit (EDOU). This protocol was based on dynamic treatment guidelines and required regular updates to allow our team to provide the most up-to-date care throughout the pandemic. Methods This study is a retrospective chart review of all adult patients seen at two large suburban EDs for symptoms related to COVID-19 from April 2020 to January 2022. We subsequently identified adult patients who met the criteria for treatment with our COVID-19 protocol and were placed in our observation unit. These patients were identified using a flag for the protocol order set within our electronic medical record. Primary outcomes include the need for hospital admission, bounce back rate, and death rate. Results A total of 2,417 patients were treated in our ED observation units using our COVID-19 protocol. Our study population was evenly divided by gender, while a majority self-identified as white (76%). Five hundred two patients (20.8%) required admission to the hospital, and of these, 55 (11%) patients required intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. A total of 27 (1.1%) patients died. No deaths occurred for patients that remained within our ED observation units. Bounce back rates at the 48-hour, 72-hour, and seven-day marks were 3.6%, 4.6%, and 7.9%, respectively. Finally, we calculated a total of 284 inpatient days saved with the implementation of our protocol. Conclusion This study shows that our newly created protocol is effective in that it reduces the need for inpatient hospital admissions and results in low bounce back rates. Protocol-driven care in ED observation units can be a powerful tool against hospital overcrowding. Creating such protocols offers opportunities for hospital systems to provide efficient care at a significant cost savings without sacrificing quality of care. Our COVID-19 treatment protocol can be replicated by other hospital systems within their own ED observation units should any future similar outbreaks occur.
RESUMEN
Challenges to health care access in the US are forcing local policymakers and service delivery systems to find novel ways to address the shortage of primary care clinicians. The uninsured and underinsured face the greatest obstacles in accessing services. Geographic information systems mapping software was used to illustrate health disparities in Alachua County, FL; galvanize a community response; and direct reallocation of resources. The University of Florida Family Data Center created "hot spot" density maps of important health and social indicators to highlight the location of disparities at the neighborhood level. Maps were produced for Medicaid births, teen births, low birth weight, domestic violence incidents, child maltreatment reports, unexcused school absences, and juvenile justice referrals. Maps were widely shared with community partners, including local elected officials, law enforcement, educators, child welfare agencies, health care providers, and service organizations. This data sharing resulted in advocacy efforts to bring resources to the greatest-need neighborhoods in the county. Novel public-private partnerships were forged between the local library district, children and family service providers, and university administrators. Two major changes are detailed: a family resource center built in the neighborhood of greatest need and a mobile clinic staffed by physicians, nurses, physician assistants, health educators, and student and faculty volunteers. Density maps have several advantages. They require minimal explanation. Anyone familiar with local geographic features can quickly identify locations displaying health disparities. Personalizing health disparities by locating them geographically allows a community to translate data to action to improve health care access.