RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cephalexin on the fracture union histomorphometrically, radiologically, biomechanically, immunohistochemically, and histopathologically in a rat femur fracture model and to evaluate the effects of the antibiotics to be used in the prophylaxis of fracture infection on the union of the fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups as two-week control (C2) and cephalexin (CEP2) and four-week control (C4) and cephalexin (CEP4). After establishment of standard fracture model on right femurs, 60 mg/kg/day of cephalexin was applied to CEP2 and CEP4 by oral gavage. Radiological, biomechanical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and histomorphometric examinations were performed on amputated femurs. RESULTS: Callus volume of CEP4 group significantly increased compared to CEP2 group (p=0.005), while no significant difference was found in the bone mineral density and callus/bone volume among the groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in flexural strength between the C4 and CEP4 groups (p=0.093). Histological healing scores increased from Week 2 to Week 4 (p=0.002) and inflammation scores decreased in both control and cephalexin groups (p=0.010 and p=0.008); however, no significant difference was found in healing and inflammation scores (p>0.05). The CD34+ immunoreactivity in the CEP2 group was significantly higher than the C2 group (p=0.029). Collagen type III level was significantly lower in the CEP2 and CEP4 groups compared to the corresponding control groups (p=0.008 and p=0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cephalexin did not exert any radiological, histopathological, histomorphometric, biomechanical, and immunohistochemical adverse effects on the femoral fracture healing model in rats; however, it showed positive effects on CD34 and Collagen type III levels. Based on these findings, antibiotherapy with cephalexin may be considered as a safe treatment for fracture union.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Curación de Fractura , Ratas , Masculino , Animales , Ratas Wistar , Cefalexina/farmacología , Cefalexina/uso terapéutico , Colágeno Tipo III , Fracturas del Fémur/tratamiento farmacológico , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis in pediatric patients is rare. Osteomalacia and osteoporosis are known to develop in syndromic or neuromuscular scoliosis children. Spinal deformity surgery for pediatric patients with osteoporosis is challenging, associated with pedicle screw (PS) failure and compression fractures. Cement augmentation of PS is one several measures to prevent screw failure. It provides additional pull-out strength to the PS in the osteoporotic vertebra. METHODS: In 2010-2020, an analysis of pediatric patients who had cement augmentation of PS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed. Radiological and clinical evaluations were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 7 patients (4 girls, 3 boys) with a mean age of 13 years (range, 10-14 years) and mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-3 years). Only 2 patients underwent revision surgery. Total number of cement augmented PSs was 52 with an average of 7 per patient. Only 1 patient had lower instrumented vertebra vertebroplasty. There was no PS pull-out in the cement augmented levels, and there were no neurological deficits or pulmonary cement embolisms. One patient developed a PS pull-out in uncemented levels. Two patients developed compression fractures, one, with osteogenesis imperfecta, in the supra-adjacent levels (upper instrumented vertebra + 1 and upper instrumented vertebra + 2), and the other, with neuromuscular scoliosis, in the uncemented segments. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all cement augmented PSs provided satisfactory radiological outcomes without PS pull-out and adjacent vertebral compression fracture. In pediatric spine surgery, in osteoporotic patients with a poor bone purchase, cement augmentation may be used, especially in high-risk patients with osteogenesis imperfecta, neuromuscular scoliosis, and syndromic scoliosis.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Osteogénesis Imperfecta , Osteoporosis , Tornillos Pediculares , Escoliosis , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Columna Vertebral , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spondylolisthesis changes the pelvic morphology and sagittal spinopelvic alignment with abnormality compared to individuals with similar pelvic morphology. There are many treatment options including a combination of decompression and fusion. In spondylolisthesis patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis, bone to bone contact (closed intradiscal space), and high-grade disc degeneration with disc collapse, fusion is challenging. METHODS: From 2011 through 2020, an analysis of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis patients who had L5-S1 transdiscal screw fixation with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed. Radiological evaluation and clinical measures were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative complications were analyzed. Also, L5-S1 degree fusion was analyzed using a computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Eight patients of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with a mean follow-up of 69 (25-122) months. All patients were female; the average age was 58 (43-78) years. 4 patients presented with high-grade spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade III). Among the patients, 3 patients were undergoing revision surgery. Only 5 patients had interbody fusion for their adjacent levels. In the postoperative follow-up, none of the patients had neurological deficits. Radiological evaluations of L5-S1 level showed fusion in all patients. Only 1 patient had rod failure and was advised for revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: L5-S1 transdiscal screw fixation may provide a satisfactory rigid fixation and fusion at the L5-S1 level in cases of spondylolisthesis. This technique requires a surgeon's experience. Despite the challenge of this technique, it can provide a safe option for acquiring rigid stabilization.