RESUMEN
A 75-year-old woman presented with new onset of confusion, intense episodic dizziness and formed visual hallucinations. Herpes simplex encephalitis and non-convulsive temporal lobe seizures were confirmed with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and electroencephalography testing. In addition, her hospital course was complicated by syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and atonic bladder contributing to an episode of urinary tract infection. After completing 3 weeks of acyclovir treatment, the patient became obtunded with right arm choreiform movements and persistent inflammatory CSF findings not attributable to persistent herpes simplex virus infection or other confounding factors. The patient responded to steroid treatment. Repeated autoimmune and paraneoplastic evaluations were negative. Both clinical (cognitive testing and atonic bladder) and CSF inflammatory finding improved in the follow-up period.
Asunto(s)
Encefalitis por Herpes Simple/diagnóstico , Encefalitis/diagnóstico , Aciclovir/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Corea/etiología , Electroencefalografía , Encefalitis/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Encefalitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Encefalitis/etiología , Encefalitis por Herpes Simple/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Encefalitis por Herpes Simple/complicaciones , Encefalitis por Herpes Simple/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/complicaciones , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria de Baja Actividad/complicaciones , Retención Urinaria/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/complicacionesRESUMEN
In this study, we compare the outcomes of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) versus the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) treated patients at a tertiary medical center and up to 2 years follow-up. Unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited following stenting with PES (159 patients) or EES (189 patients). The primary endpoint of the study was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints included target vessel revascularization (TVR), TLR, target vessel failure (TVF), acute stent thrombosis (ST), total death, cardiac death, and nonfatal MI. Patients treated with the PES stent had less congestive heart failure and restenotic lesions, but a higher prevalence of longer lesions, nonleft main bifurcations, required more stents per patient (4.3 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 2.1). TLF occurred in 32.3% PES versus 21.5% EES (p = 0.027). The secondary unadjusted endpoints for PES versus EES, respectively, were TVF 38.6 versus 30.7% (p = 0.140), TVR 35.7 versus 26.5% (p = 0.079), definite and probable ST 1.2 versus 0.0%, nonfatal MI 4.5 versus 4.2%, and mortality 9.6 versus 4.0%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the numbers of stents per patient (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.01), and renal failure (p = 0.045) were independent predictors of TLF. Using univariate analysis, EES had lower TLF than PES in a cohort of unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at 2 years follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that the numbers of stents per patient, age, and renal failure, but not stent type, were predictors of TLF.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries with balloon angioplasty carries a high rate of recurrence and requires frequent repeat stenting. In the "Instructions for Use," SilverHawk atherectomy (SA) is contraindicated for in-stent restenosis at a peripheral site. SA, however, has a theoretical advantage of reducing the volume of restenotic tissue and potentially delaying the need for frequent repeat revascularization and additional stenting. We present a retrospective analysis from our center on the safety and outcomes of SA in the treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were collected on all patients who underwent SA for in-stent restenosis from February 2005 to April 2010 at a single medical center. Major adverse events and 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were obtained by review of medical records and phone calls. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for TVR were plotted. RESULTS: A total of 41 consecutive patients (mean age 70.9±9.2 years, 56% males) were included and followed for a mean of 331.63 days. The following variables were noted: mean ankle brachial index (ABI) of treated leg 0.66±0.2; chronic renal failure (creatinine >2.0 at baseline) 14.6%; diabetes 61%; history of smoking 85.4%; number of vessel runoffs of treated limb 1.9±0.9; hypertension 90.2%; lesion length 126.2±79.3mm; lesion severity 90.7±8.2%; vessel diameter 5.8±0.7 mm. All patients received bivalirudin during the procedure and were on aspirin. Ninety-five percent of patients were placed on clopidogrel. Adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 97.6% at a mean pressure of 11.9±3.3atm. Embolic filter protection (EFP) was used in 56.1% of patients. Bailout stenting was 24.4%. Acute procedural success (<30% angiographic residual narrowing) occurred in 100% of patients. Compared to baseline, ABI at 1 month significantly improved to 0.91±0.19 (P<0.05) but was not statistically different at 1 year (0.61±0.28). Debris was noted in 81.9% of filters used; 36.4% were macrodebris. The following adverse events were reported: distal embolization (DE) requiring treatment 7.3%; stent thrombosis 4.9%; planned minor amputation in the nonindex limb 2.4%. No device-related complications occurred. There was no death or amputation. TLR and TVR occurred in 31.7% and 34.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SA has favorable acute results in treating in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries. At 1 year, TLR and TVR remain high but compare favorably to published data. DE also occurs significantly with SA and EFP appears to be effective in capturing the debris.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Constricción Patológica , Dispositivos de Protección Embólica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Iowa , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this study we compared the outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients treated at a tertiary medical center, with up to one year of follow-up. METHODS: Unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited following stenting with the ZES (n = 197) or EES (n = 190). The first 100 consecutive patients in each cohort underwent syntax scoring. The primary endpoint of the study was target vessel failure, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization, target lesion failure, acute stent thrombosis, total death, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The two groups were similar, including for Syntax scores (19.6 ± 12.8 versus 20.6 ± 13.6), number of stents per patient (2.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.9 ± 2.1), and cardiovascular risk factors. By one year, the primary outcome occurred in 20.8% EES versus 26.7% ZES (P = 0.19) patients. The secondary endpoints were as follows: target lesion revascularization (8.9% versus 20.6%, P = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (18.9% versus 25.6%, P = 0.142), definite and probable stent thrombosis (0% versus 2.5%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.7% versus 3.6%), and mortality (3.2% versus 5.1%) for the EES versus the ZES, respectively. CONCLUSION: EES had similar target vessel failure to ZES, but superior target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure at one year of follow-up in an unselected cohort of patients.