RESUMEN
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of unmarried youth is an important issue, particularly in Indian society, where premarital sex is socially restricted. It is an uncomfortable subject for most people, including healthcare providers, who are responsible for catering to the reproductive health needs of youth. This is because of the prevailing social norms, where sex outside marriage is discouraged and stigmatised. These social norms give importance to virginity, and children outside marriage are not welcome. The present qualitative study was conducted in public health facilities (primary and secondary) to explore the attitudes of healthcare providers in providing contraceptive services to unmarried youth. In-depth interviews were conducted with family planning (FP) service providers (frontline healthcare workers [ASHAs] nurses and FP counsellors) between October 2017 and September 2018. Almost a quarter of the providers were either hesitant or against providing contraceptives to unmarried youth. Providers stated that they preferred emergency contraceptive pills for unmarried girls if they had already engaged in unprotected sex. Providers expressed strong personal views against premarital sex because they believed it was against existing social norms. Some providers were concerned about the possible negative reactions of the community if they recommended any contraceptive to unmarried youth. A few providers even considered it illegal to provide contraceptives to unmarried youth, though there is no such law in the country. Findings further indicated that though the country had launched programmes for improving adolescents and youth SRH, service providers were still conflicted between medical eligibility and social beliefs.
Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Persona Soltera , Investigación Cualitativa , Servicios de Planificación FamiliarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Published studies reveal that individuals with lower extremity amputation are vulnerable to cardiovascular diseases (CVD) because of poor physical activity level. Many cardiovascular risk assessment studies have utilized anthropometric traits (primarily body mass index and waist circumference) as cardiovascular risk factor. However, some studies emphasized the technical limitations of measuring waist circumference for studying cardiovascular risk, and so it is difficult to obtain correct measurement from the individuals with lower extremity amputation. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present article are to study the prevalence of CVD risk factors among the individuals with traumatic lower extremity amputation and to test the validity of upper arm circumference (UAC) as an alternative anthropometric measurement for screening the CVD risk condition. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Anthropometric data and other cardiovascular traits data have been collected from unilateral traumatic lower extremity amputated adult males (n = 85) residing in Calcutta and adjoining areas. RESULTS: Results show higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factor among individuals with above-knee amputation than below-knee amputation. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis shows significant ability of upper arm circumference to diagnose cardiovascular risk condition. The cutoff value of UAC > 26.6 cm show maximum sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cardiovascular risk condition. Although, binomial tests for equality of proportion does not show any significant difference, however, agreement statistics reveal better diagnostic ability of cutoff value of UAC than the existing cutoff value of waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, UAC provides a better assessment of cardiovascular risk condition than does waist circumference especially for individuals with lower extremity amputation. SPONSORSHIP: Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata.