RESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Inflammatory activity within the stroma of invasive colorectal tumours is known to be a key predictor of disease activity with type, density and location of immune cells impacting on patient prognosis. To date, there has been no report of inflammatory phenotype within pre-malignant human colonic adenomas. Assessing the stromal microenvironment and particularly, inflammatory activity within colorectal neoplastic lesions is central to understanding early colorectal carcinogenesis. Inflammatory cell infiltrate was assessed by immunohistochemistry in paired colonic adenoma and adjacent normal colonic mucosa samples, and adenomas exhibiting increasing degrees of epithelial cell dysplasia. Macrophage phenotype was assessed using double stain immunohistochemistry incorporating expression of an intracellular enzyme of function. A targeted array of inflammatory cytokine and receptor genes, validated by RT-PCR, was used to assess inflammatory gene expression. Inflammatory cell infiltrates are a key feature of sporadic adenomatous colonic polyps with increased macrophage, neutrophil and T cell (specifically helper and activated subsets) infiltration in adenomatous colonic polyps, that increases in association with characteristics of high malignant potential, namely, increasing degree of cell dysplasia and adenoma size. Macrophages within adenomas express iNOS, suggestive of a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Several inflammatory cytokine genes (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CCL20, IL8, CCL23, CCL19, CCL21, CCL5) are dysregulated in adenomas. This study has provided evidence of increased inflammation within pre-malignant colonic adenomas. This may allow potential mechanistic pathways in the initiation and promotion of early colorectal carcinogenesis to be identified.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Microambiente Tumoral , Adenoma/genética , Adenoma/patología , Pólipos del Colon/genética , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Citocinas/genética , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inflamación/etiología , Inflamación/patología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Macrófagos/inmunología , PronósticoRESUMEN
Host genetic factors play an important role in modifying the risk of human disease, including cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract, with increasing interest in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and the impact of genetic polymorphisms in these systems. The CD14-159C/T and the TLR9-1237T/C promoter polymorphisms have previously been shown to be associated with various inflammatory conditions including Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in Caucasian populations. In this study, we assessed the association of these two functional single nucleotide polymorphisms with gastric cancer in two independent Caucasian population-based case-control studies of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, initially in 312 noncardia gastric carcinoma cases and 419 controls and then in 184 noncardia gastric carcinomas, 123 cardia carcinomas, 159 esophageal cancers, and 211 frequency-matched controls. Odds ratios were computed from logistic models and adjusted for potential confounding factors. No significant association was found between the CD14-159C/T and the TLR9-1237T/C promoter polymorphisms and increased risk of gastric cancer. Neither single nucleotide polymorphism has been assessed in a Caucasian gastric cancer case-control study before; although the CD14-159C/T polymorphism has been reported to show no apparent association with H. pylori-related gastric malignancy in a Taiwanese Chinese population. In conclusion, although our earlier preliminary studies suggested that the CD14-159C/T and the TLR9-1237T/C promoter polymorphisms increase the risk of precancerous outcomes, they do not seem to increase the risk of gastric cancer itself. This discrepancy merits further examination.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Receptores de Lipopolisacáridos/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Receptor Toll-Like 9/genética , Población Blanca/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genética de Población , Humanos , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento , Masculino , Polonia , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/fisiología , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative benefits and risks of laparoscopic fundoplication surgery as an alternative to long term drug treatment for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic randomised trial (with parallel preference groups). SETTING: 21 hospitals in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 357 randomised participants (178 surgical, 179 medical) and 453 preference participants (261, 192); mean age 46; 66% men. All participants had documented evidence of GORD and symptoms for >12 months. INTERVENTION: The type of laparoscopic fundoplication used was left to the discretion of the surgeon. Those allocated to medical treatment had their treatment reviewed and adjusted as necessary by a local gastroenterologist, and subsequent clinical management was at the discretion of the clinician responsible for care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The disease specific REFLUX quality of life score (primary outcome), SF-36, EQ-5D, and medication use, measured at time points equivalent to three and 12 months after surgery, and surgical complications. MAIN RESULTS: Randomised participants had received drugs for GORD for median of 32 months before trial entry. Baseline REFLUX scores were 63.6 (SD 24.1) and 66.8 (SD 24.5) in the surgical and medical randomised groups, respectively. Of those randomised to surgery, 111 (62%) actually had total or partial fundoplication. Surgical complications were uncommon with a conversion rate of 0.6% and no mortality. By 12 months, 38% (59/154) randomised to surgery (14% (14/104) among those who had fundoplication) were taking reflux medication versus 90% (147/164) randomised medical management. The REFLUX score favoured the randomised surgical group (14.0, 95% confidence interval 9.6 to 18.4; P<0.001). Differences of a third to half of 1 SD in other health status measures also favoured the randomised surgical group. Baseline scores in the preference for surgery group were the worst; by 12 months these were better than in the preference for medical treatment group. CONCLUSION: At least up to 12 months after surgery, laparoscopic fundoplication significantly increased measures of health status in patients with GORD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15517081.
Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: TLR4 is a cell-surface signaling receptor involved in the recognition and host response to Helicobacter pylori. The TLR4+896A>G polymorphism linked with impaired reactivity to bacterial lipopolysaccharide may play a role in gastric carcinogenesis. METHODS: We assessed associations with premalignant gastric changes in 149 relatives of gastric cancer patients, including 45 with hypochlorhydria and gastric atrophy. We also genotyped 2 independent Caucasian population-based case-control studies of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, initially in 312 noncardia gastric carcinoma cases and 419 controls and then in 184 noncardia gastric carcinomas, 123 cardia carcinomas, 159 esophageal cancers, and 211 frequency-matched controls. Odds ratios were computed from logistic models and adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: TLR4+896G carriers had an 11-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-48) increased odds ratio (OR) for hypochlorhydria; the polymorphism was unassociated with gastric acid output in the absence of H pylori infection. Carriers also had significantly more severe gastric atrophy and inflammation. Seventeen percent of gastric carcinoma patients in the initial study and 15% of the noncardia gastric carcinoma patients in the replication study had 1 or 2 TLR4 variant alleles vs 8% of both control populations (combined OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6-3.4). In contrast, prevalence of TLR4+896G was not significantly increased in esophageal squamous cell (2%, OR = 0.2) or adenocarcinoma (9%, OR = 1.4) or gastric cardia carcinoma (11%, OR = 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the TLR4+896A>G polymorphism is a risk factor for noncardia gastric carcinoma and its precursors. The findings underscore the role of the host innate immune response in outcome of H pylori infection.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/genética , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori , Polimorfismo Genético , Lesiones Precancerosas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Receptor Toll-Like 4/genética , Aclorhidria/genética , Aclorhidria/microbiología , Carcinoma/microbiología , Carcinoma/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Gastritis Atrófica/genética , Gastritis Atrófica/microbiología , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Frecuencia de los Genes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/genética , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Fenotipo , Vigilancia de la Población , Lesiones Precancerosas/microbiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) has been proved as a screening investigation for colorectal cancer, but has disadvantages. Newer faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have many advantages, but yield higher positivity rates and are expensive. A two-tier reflex follow-up of gFOBT-positive individuals with a FIT before colonoscopy has been advocated as an efficient and effective approach. METHODS: A new simple and stable card collection FIT was evaluated. RESULTS: 1124 individuals who were gFOBT positive were asked to provide samples. 558 individuals participated, 320 refused and 246 did not return samples. No evidence of sampling bias was found. 302 individuals tested FIT negative and 256 tested positive. In the 302 FIT-negative individuals, 2 (0.7%) had cancer and 12 (4.0%) had large or multiple (high-risk) adenomatous polyps. In contrast, of 254 positive individuals, 47 (18.5%) had cancer and 54 (21.3%) had high-risk polyps. 93 (30.8%) of the FIT-negative individuals had a normal colonoscopy, but only 34 (13.4%) of the FIT-positive individuals had no pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (and 95% CIs) for cancer were 95.9% (84.8 to 99.3), 59.2% (54.7 to 63.5), 2.35 (2.08 to 2.65) and 0.07 (0.02 to 0.27), and for cancer and high-risk polyps were 87.8% (80.1 to 92.9), 65.3% (60.6 to 69.7), 2.53 (2.19 to 2.93) and 0.19 (0.11 to 0.31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A two-tier reflex screening algorithm, in which gFOBT-positive participants are tested with a FIT, is effective in identifying individuals at high risk of significant colorectal neoplasia. This strategy is transferable across different FIT formats. This approach has been adopted for the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sangre Oculta , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico , Anciano , Colonoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Rockall scoring system was developed in unselected patients, the majority of whom did not receive endoscopic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Rockall system in high-risk patients who undergo endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer hemorrhage. METHODS: Rockall scores were calculated in 247 patients with major peptic ulcer bleeding entered into a randomized trial of endoscopic therapy. The observed rates of recurrent bleeding and mortality after endoscopic therapy were compared with predicted rates derived from Rockall's study group. The validity of the Rockall system was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination. RESULTS: Rates of recurrent bleeding and mortality after endoscopic therapy increased with an increasing Rockall score. Observed rates of recurrent bleeding and mortality were below predicted rates, and calibration of the Rockall system was poor (Mantel-Haenszel chi square = 25.8, p < 0.0001 for recurrent bleeding; Mantel-Haenszel chi square = 15.1, p < 0.0001 for death). For the prediction of recurrent bleeding, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was low (63.4%), but the system was satisfactory when predicting mortality (area under the resulting curve, 84.3%). CONCLUSIONS: After endoscopic therapy for a bleeding peptic ulcer, the Rockall scoring system can identify patients at high risk of death, but it is inadequate for the prediction of recurrent bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Hemostasis Endoscópica/métodos , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemostáticos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trombina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Screening for colorectal cancer by use of guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) reduces disease-specific mortality. However, due to imperfect specificity, about half of individuals positive for guaiac FOBT are negative for neoplasia on colonoscopy. We aimed to assess whether the testing of individuals positive for guaiac FOBT in a screening programme for colorectal cancer by use of a sensitive immunochemical FOBT could select more appropriately those who should receive colonoscopy. METHODS: We invited individuals who were guaiac FOBT positive in the second screening round of a pilot study in Scotland, UK, to give two samples, each from separate stools, for immunochemical FOBT while awaiting colonoscopy. Results were classed as: both samples negative (N/N), one sample negative and one positive (N/P), and both samples positive (P/P); data were assessed for sampling bias. We compared immunochemical findings with those from colonoscopy using odds ratios of positive samples (P/P) versus negative (N/N and N/P). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for cancer, and for cancer and high-risk adenomatous polyps were also calculated. FINDINGS: 1486 participants were invited and 801 (54%) sets of duplicate samples were returned. We found no evidence of sampling bias with regard to sex, age, or degree of positivity on guaiac FOBT. Of 800 sets returned with consent and analysed, 173 (22%) were N/N, 129 (16%) were N/P, and 498 (62%) were P/P. Chi2 test showed a highly significant positive correlation between degree of positivity on guaiac FOBT and on immunochemical FOBT (p<0.003). 795 individuals had data for colonoscopy: one (<1%) of 171 N/N participants and one (<1%) of 127 N/P participants had colorectal cancer, compared with 38 (8%) of 497 P/P participants; adenomatous polyps were found in 28 (16%) N/N individuals, 24 (19%) N/P individuals, and 193 (39%) P/P individuals. Normal colonoscopy was less common in the P/P group (85 [17%]) than in the N/N (67 [39%]) and N/P (49 [39%]) groups. The odds ratio for P/P being associated with cancer was 7.57 (95% CI 1.84-31.4) and with high-risk adenomatous polyps was 3.11 (1.86-5.18). Sensitivity of a P/P result for cancer was 95.0% (81.8-99.1), and for cancer and high-risk adenomatous polyps was 90.1% (84.4-94.0); specificity was 39.5% (36.0-43.1) and 47.8% (43.9-51.8), respectively. INTERPRETATION: Immunochemical FOBT for individuals with positive guaiac FOBT could decrease substantially the number of false positives in a screening programme for colorectal cancer.