RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer surgery is suitable for outpatient practice. Indeed, this is a planned surgery with short operative time. Objective was to evaluate the recognized success indicators in day surgery: rate of conversion into conventional hospitalization, rate of complications and re-hospitalizations the month following surgery. METHODS: Consecutive cases of breast cancer patients operated in day surgery were prospectively entered into the Day Surgery database between 25 November 2012 and 31 December 2013. Patient characteristics and tumor pathology, preoperative procedures and type of surgery were collected. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-six consecutive patients were included. The mean age was 54 years [25-84], we performed 382 conservative breast surgery (98.2%), 238 sentinel node (60.1%) and 40 axillary lymphadenectomy (10.1%). Thirty-nine scheduled for outpatient surgery were hospitalized in conventional surgery being a conversion rate of 9.8%, 95% CI [6.9-12.7] with 24 patients because of a drainage (61.5%). We have observed 15 complications in the month after the surgery (3.7%, 95% CI [1.8-5.6]), and 5 rehospitalization in the month following surgery (1.2%, IC 95% [0.1-2.3]). CONCLUSION: Postoperative complication and readmissions are very low (<5%) after breast ambulatory surgery. This confirms its feasibility and safety in a breast cancer center. Adaptating anaesthetic methods to ambulatory care and preparing patient going home with an axillary drain are necessary to reduce rate of conversion to hospitalisation.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The poor prognosis of patients who experience ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is established. A short time between primary cancer and IBTR is a prognostic factor but no clinically relevant threshold was determined. Classification of IBTR may help tailor treatment strategies. PURPOSE: We determined a specific time frame, which differentiates IBTR into early and late recurrence, and identified prognostic factors for patients with IBTR at time of the recurrence. METHODS: We analyzed 2209 patients with IBTR after BCS. We applied the optimal cut-points method for survival data to determine the cut-off times to IBTR. A subgroup analysis was performed by hormone receptor (HR) status. Survival analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazard model to determine clinical features associated with distant-disease-free survival (DDFS) after IBTR. We therefor built decision trees. RESULTS: On the 828 metastatic events observed, the majority occurred within the first 3 months after IBTR: 157 in the HR positive group, 98 in the HR negative group. We found different prognostic times to IBTR: 49 months in the HR positive group, 33 in the HR negative group. After multivariate analysis, time to IBTR was the first discriminant prognostic factor in both groups (HR 0.65 CI95% [0.54-0.79] and 0.42 [0.30-0.57] respectively). The other following variables were significantly correlated with the DDFS: the initial number of positive lymph nodes for both groups, the initial tumor size and grade for HR positive tumors. CONCLUSION: A short interval time to IBTR is the strongest factor of poor prognosis and reflects occult distant disease. It would appear that prognosis after IBTR depends more on clinical and histological parameters than on surgical treatment. A prospective trial in a low-risk group of patients to validate the safety of salvage BCS instead of mastectomy in IBTR is needed.