RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) indicates generalised atherosclerotic disease but is often asymptomatic. The prevalence and potential risk factors of PAD were studied in ECHORN cohort study participants. METHODS: Representative samples of community-dwelling people ≥40 years of age residing in Barbados, Puerto Rico, Trinidad, and the USVI were recruited. The survey included questions on diabetes, hypertension, heart disease and smoking status. Body Mass Index, HbA1c, blood glucose and lipids were determined. Ankle brachial index (ABI) was evaluated in one leg. An oscillometric device measured arm and leg systolic BP simultaneously. ABI classifications were PAD ≤0.90, borderline 0.91 to 0.99, normal 1.00 to 1.40, and non-compressible >0.40. Multivariable logistic regression tested associations of potential risk factors with PAD. RESULTS: Of 2772 participants (mean age 57.3, 65.2% female), 35.8% were overweight, 38.1% obese, 32.4% had diabetes, 60% hypertension, and 15.4% reported heart. ABI prevalence (95% CI) by category was PAD 4.4% (3.6%, 5.1%), borderline 5.2% (4.4%, 6.1%), normal 87.0% (85.8%, 88.3%) and noncompressible 3.4% (2.7%, 4.0%). Female sex (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.77), diabetes (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.4), heart disease history (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.83) and less than high school education vs having a university degree (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.22) were independently associated with PAD. CONCLUSIONS: Testing one leg only would underestimate PAD prevalence. Increasing the ABI cutoff for identifying PAD to <1.0 when using oscillometric devices is suggested by some studies but would more than double the estimated prevalence. Guidelines need to address this issue. Female sex and lower educational attainment are important considerations when screening. While diabetes and a history of heart disease were confirmed as risk factors, the lack of association of increasing age and cigarette smoking with PAD was unexpected.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Adulto , Región del Caribe/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several authorities recommend measuring peak expiratory flow (PEF) standing. Limited evidence suggests that PEF obtained sitting is similar in magnitude but there are no studies in African populations. AIM: To determine in adults aged 18-60 years if PEF measured sitting differs from that measured standing. DESIGN & SETTING: Crossover design with alternating position of initial measurement in people attending primary care clinics in Barbados. METHOD: Quota sampling by age, sex, and clinic of adults aged 18-60 years was done and an interviewer-administered questionnaire was completed. PEF sitting and standing was measured with an European Union (EU) scale Mini-Wright® meter. The highest of three readings in each position was used and the difference in means tested for significance using the paired sample t-test. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 199 participants were 44% male; 96.5% of African descent; mean age 37 years (standard deviation [SD] 12.8); 22% with an asthma diagnosis; 23% tobacco users; and 22% marijuana users. Mean PEF standing was 438.4 versus 429.7 lmin-1 sitting, mean difference 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.6 to 13.8). For men, mean PEF standing was 518.7 versus 506.3 lmin-1 sitting, mean difference 12.4 (95% CI = 3.3 to 21.5). For women, mean PEF was 374.7 standing versus 368.9 lmin-1 sitting, mean difference 5.8 (95% CI = 0.11 to 11.5). A Bland-Altman plot accounting for trend and a Lin's correlation coefficient of 0.935 demonstrated good agreement between standing and sitting PEF. CONCLUSION: PEF measurements are reduced when performed sitting compared to standing. The difference is small and unlikely to alter clinical management in most cases.