RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether self-perceived oral health impact and satisfaction measure oral health in the same way as do clinical indicators in adults and older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The population consisted of adult patients aged 20 to 59 years receiving care at "Juan Pablo II" Health Care Centre and older adult patients aged 60 or more years from the home for the elderly "Virgen del Amor Hermoso", Lima, Peru. The indices Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) and Oral Satisfaction Scale of 0-10 (OSS 0-10) were used to evaluate perceived impact of and satisfaction with oral health. In addition, the following internationally validated criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) were used as clinical indicators: Decayed-Missing-Filled Teeth (DMFT) Index, O'Leary's Hygiene Index, Community Periodontal Index, Motivation to Hygiene Index, Denture Situation Index, Need for Denture Index, Denture Hygiene Index and Oral Mucosal Lesion Index. RESULTS: Forty-four adults and 53 older adults participated. OIDP showed that the greatest perceived difficulty in daily performance was "eating and enjoying food" (adults: 77.3% and older adults: 79.2%). The OSS 0-10 showed that among adults, 43.1% were dissatisfied, 20.5% were neutral and 36.4% were satisfied, while among older adults, 45.3% were dissatisfied, 22.6% were neutral and 32.1% were satisfied. A statistically significant association was found between OSS 0-10 and 1. DMFT index in adults; 2. upper denture situation in older adults; and 3. denture hygiene in older adults. A highly significant inverse linear correlation was found between OIDP and OSS 0-10 in adults and older adults. CONCLUSION: The perceived impact of oral health does not have a demonstrable association with oral health problems when used as an instrument for measuring oral health status, whereas perceived satisfaction with oral health has a better association with the clinical indicators.
Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Salud Bucal , Salud Bucal , Calidad de Vida , Autoinforme , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perú , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objetivo. Determinar la prevalencia de la pérdida de implantes dentales en una facultad peruana de odontología, entre los años 2001 y 2011. Material y métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, observacional y transversal. Se observaron 431 historias clínicas de pacientes atendidos en la maestría en periodoncia de la USMP, entre los años 2001 y 2011. Fueron colocados 1136 implantes durante ese periodo; estos se agruparon según edad y género del paciente, y maxilar y año en que se colocaron. Se determinó la prevalencia de la pérdida de los implantes dentales, respecto a la cantidad total concerniente a cada categoría. Resultados. La ocurrencia de pérdida de implantes dentales fue de 1,85%, respecto a la cantidad total de implantes dentales colocados. Específicamente, de 1,88% en el maxilar superior, 2,30% en el maxilar inferior, 1,80% en pacientes de género masculino, y 1,57% en pacientes de género femenino. Según la edad del paciente fueron de 2,51% en pacientes sobre los 60 años de edad, 1,20% en pacientes entre los 40 y 59 años, y de 2,60% en pacientes menores de 40 años. La pérdida de implantes dentales producida en el año 2010 fue de 7,98%, siendo la más alta durante todo el periodo estudiado. Conclusiones. Se encontró una mayor prevalencia de pérdida de implantes dentales en el maxilar inferior, en pacientes del género masculino, y en pacientes menores de 40 años de edad. Finalmente, la prevalencia de pérdida de implantes dentales encontrada fue baja respecto al total de implantes dentales colocados en ese periodo.
Objective. To determine the prevalence of dental implants loss in a Peruvian dental school, from 2001 to 2011. Material and methods. A cross, observational, retrospective, descriptive study. 431 medical records of patients attended at the USMPs master in periodontics were seen, from 2001 to 2011. 1136 implants were placed during this period; these were grouped according to age and sex of the patient, and maxillary and year in which they were placed. The prevalence of dental implants loss was determined in respect to the total cases of each concerned category. Results. The prevalence of dental implants loss was 1,85%, relative to the total amount of dental implants placed. Specifically, 1,88% in the maxilla, 2,30% in the mandible, 1,80% in male patients, and 1,57% in female patients. Depending on patients age, it was 2,51% in patients above 60 years old, 1,20% in patients aged from 40 to 59, and 2,60% in patients younger than 40. The dental implants loss produced in 2010 was 7,98% being this the highest. Conclusions. We found a higher prevalence of dental implants loss in the mandible, in male patients, and in patients younger than 40 years old. Finally, the prevalence of dental implants loss was low compared to the total dental implants placed in that period.
Asunto(s)
Facultades de Odontología , Implantes Dentales , Mandíbula , Registros Médicos , Estudio Observacional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios TransversalesAsunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirugía Bucal , Diente Molar , Radiografía Panorámica , Sinostosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
La finalidad del presente trabajo, es comparar y evaluar la fuerza de adhesión entre superficies dentinarias, experimentando la forma de secar; sin deshidratar la dentina y tratando de evitar a futuro, el utilizar la tradicional técnica de secado con aire comprimido. Se realizó la técnica de secado mecánica, aplicando dos tipos de elementos que absorben la humedad como son el papel tisú y espuma, para así verificar la adhesión del material en la superficie dentinaria. Por tanto, se ha comprobado la resistencia a la tracción de los materiales adhesivos dentinarios utilizando la técnica con espuma, por lo que se ha obtenido valores por encima del estrés de contracción, presentando los valores de menor dispersión, además presenta manipulación sencilla y fácil, siendo constante el grosor y tamaño de la espuma que se necesite.
The purpose of the present work, is to compare and to evaluate the force of adhesion between dentinarias surfaces being experienced the form to dry, without dehydrating the dentine and trying to avoid to future, using the traditional technique of drying with compressed air, I am made the mechanical technique of drying, applying two types of elements that absorb the humidity as they are the tisu paper and foams, thus to verify the adhesion of the material in the dentinaria surface. Therefore the tensile strength of the dentinarios sticky materials has been verified using the technique with foam, reason why it has obtained values over stress of contradiction, having presented / displayed the values of smaller dispersion, in addition it presents / displays simple and easy manipulation, being constant the so large and easy manipulation, being constant the so large thickness and of the foam that is needed.