RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leak occurs in 5-17% of patients following surgical valve replacement, more often in mitral position. The prognosis without treatment is poor. Percutaneous device closure represents an alternative to repeat surgery. The objective of this work is to evaluate the medium and long-term results in the percutaneous closure of PVL in mitral prosthesis. METHODS: This observational study is based on a retrospective registry including consecutive mitral PVL cases undergoing percutaneous closure at a single tertiary-care center from April 2010 to December 2020. The safety and efficacy results of the procedure, at 90 days and in the long term, were analyzed. Also, predictors of procedure failure and long-term events were identified. RESULTS: A total of 128 consecutive mitral paravalvular leak closure procedures were included. Technical success was achieved in 115 (89.8%) procedures. The presence of multiple PVLs was the sole factor that independently predicted procedural failure. Median follow-up of our sample was 41.8 months (mean 47.7 ± 35.7 months). Underlying hemolytic anemia as the indication for PVL closure, a recent admission for decompensated HF, and lack of improvement in functional class emerged as consistent predictors of MACE and death during long-term follow-up, while lack of procedural success during the first PVL procedure and chronic kidney disease were also associated with MACE during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous mitral PVL closure displayed high technical and procedural success rates, with an acceptable safety profile, in a high-risk population. Percutaneous mitral PVL closure achieved an improvement in short- and long-term functional class and a reduction of hemolysis in the vast majority of patients. In addition, long-term survival in our study was good, in particular for patients undergoing successful PVL closure procedures.
RESUMEN
Background Ticagrelor use during acute coronary syndromes demonstrated a decrease in all-cause mortality in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. This effect has been attributed to a non-platelet-derived improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determine differences in the number of endothelial progenitor cells and/or circulating endothelial cells found in peripheral blood in patients treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel during non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results In this multicenter, randomized study ( NCT 02244710), patients were considered for inclusion after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction whenever they were P2Y12-inhibitor naïve. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were allocated at a 1:1 ratio. Blood samples for determining endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells were extracted before the antiplatelet loading dose, 48 hours after presentation of index symptoms, and 1 month after the event. A multichannel cytometer was used for optimal cell characterization. A total of 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Circulating endothelial cell levels corrected by white blood cells were as follows at baseline, 48 hours, and 1 month: 44 (28-64), 50 (33-63), and 38 (23-62) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 38 (29-60), 45 (32-85), and 35 (24-71) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor ( P=0.6). Endothelial progenitor cell levels were 29 (15-47), 27 (15-33), and 18 (10-25) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 20 (11-33), 22 (12-32), and 18 (11-29) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor ( P=0.9). No differences in intraindividual changes were found. Conclusions Patients treated with ticagrelor during non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, in comparison to clopidogrel, showed similar levels of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells. These data suggest that the endothelial protective effect mediated by ticagrelor is not related to bone marrow physiology modulation. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02244710.
Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Células Progenitoras Endoteliales/metabolismo , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Ticagrelor/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatación/fisiología , Anciano , Electrocardiografía , Células Progenitoras Endoteliales/citología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/metabolismo , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
Since the first percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), many studies have shown the safety and efficacy of this technique to prevent embolic strokes in nonvavular atrial fibrillation. The design, characteristics, and clinical data of the most frequently used devices for LAAO are reviewed, including the Amplatzer cardiac plug and Amulet (Abbott Vascular), the Watchman (Boston Scientific), and the LARIAT device (SentreHEART). Similarly, newer closer devices, such as Ultraseal (Cardia), LAmbre (Lifetech), and Coherex WaveCrest (Johnson & Johnson), are also discussed. Finally, new technologies still in the stage of preclinical study or in the initial clinical experience are also reviewed.