RESUMEN
Previously, our laboratory showed that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) activates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in brain-derived cells with limited HIV-1 gene expression but inhibits HIV-1 in cells fully permissive for replication of both viruses (F. M. Jault, S. A. Spector, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 68:959-973, 1994). To investigate these effects further, we developed a model system that uncouples HIV-1 gene expression from long terminal repeat (LTR) activity. Two monoclonal U373-MG astrocytoma/glioblastoma cell lines (LTRIG and LIGHIVDC) were generated, each containing an integrated copy of an LTR-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) construct and the Escherichia coli lacI gene. LIGHIVDC also has an inducible HIV-1 genome controlled by a Rous sarcoma virus promoter with lac operator sequences. Basal LTR-mediated CAT activity is 65-fold higher in LIGHIVDC than in LTRIG, and this activity is further increased (20-fold) following incubation of LIGHIVDC with isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Tat protein can be detected by immunostaining in LIGHIVDC. However, Rev-mediated transport and subsequent translation of the singly spliced and unspliced HIV-1 mRNAs is inefficient. In the absence of Tat, HCMV stimulated CAT activity approximately 20-fold, and this activation required HCMV gene expression but not viral DNA replication. LTR-directed transcription was unaffected by HCMV infection in LIGHIVDC but was inhibited in these cells when they contained increased Tat levels following IPTG induction. These results support the hypothesis that HCMV can induce the HIV-1 LTR when HIV-1 gene expression is minimal and that a threshold level of HIV-1 gene products is necessary for HCMV to inhibit this promoter.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/virología , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Duplicado del Terminal Largo de VIH , VIH-1/genética , Citomegalovirus/genética , Replicación del ADN , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Transcripción Genética , Células Tumorales CultivadasRESUMEN
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been implicated as a potential cofactor in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-related disease. Previously, we reported that HCMV inhibits HIV-1 RNA and protein synthesis in cells productively infected with both viruses but, in transient assays, activates an HIV-1 long terminal repeat-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (LTR-CAT) construct introduced into the cell by transfection (V. Koval, C. Clark, M. Vaishnav, S. A. Spector, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 65:6969-6978, 1991). We show here that HCMV can also activate an infectious proviral HIV-1 genome transiently transfected into a cell. To ascertain whether integration of the HIV-1 provirus plays a role in these differential effects, we generated monoclonal and polyclonal cell lines that each contain a single integrated copy of an HIV-1 LTR-CAT construct and compared the regulatory effects of HCMV and HIV-1 infection in these cells with those occurring in the same type of cell transiently transfected with the HIV-1 LTR-CAT construct. We find that HCMV activates the transfected HIV-1 promoter 230-fold but activates the integrated promoter only 2.8- to 54-fold. In contrast, HIV-1 stimulates the integrated HIV-1 promoter 2,700- to 6,000-fold but stimulates the transfected promoter only 80-fold. Thus, the relative response of the HIV-1 promoter to HCMV and HIV-1 regulatory proteins depends upon whether it is integrated. To determine if HIV-1 gene products are necessary for the HCMV-mediated repression, we constructed cell lines containing two different stably integrated HIV-1 proviruses: one is tat- and nef-minus and transcriptionally inactive, while the other is env- and nef-minus but actively expresses the other HIV-1 gene products. Upon infection with HCMV, HIV-1 antigen production was stimulated from the inactive HIV-1 genome but inhibited from the active genome. We propose that HCMV has two separate effects on HIV-1 replication during a coinfection. One is a slight stimulatory effect which would be undetectable during an active HIV-1 infection, while the other is a net inhibitory effect that is mediated by an interaction between HCMV and HIV-1 gene products.
Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus/genética , Regulación Viral de la Expresión Génica , VIH/genética , Replicación Viral , Línea Celular , Genes env , Genes tat , VIH/crecimiento & desarrollo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Provirus/genética , ARN Mensajero/genética , Secuencias Repetitivas de Ácidos Nucleicos , Integración ViralRESUMEN
Ubiquitin is a highly conserved, 76-amino acid, eukaryotic protein. Its widely accepted role as a proteolytic cofactor depends on its unique ability to covalently ligate to other cellular proteins. While there is good evidence for the existence of such ubiquitinated proteins in the cytosolic and nuclear compartments, relatively little is known about the presence of free ubiquitin and ubiquitinated proteins in other subcellular compartments. This is especially true of higher plants, which have not previously been the subject of extensive biochemical subcellular localizations of ubiquitinated proteins. We extracted cell wall proteins and purified nuclei, vacuoles, chloroplasts, and microsomes from chlorophyllous tissues of Arabidopsis. Immunoblot analyses were used to compare the profiles of ubiquitinated proteins from purified subcellular fractions to those from unfractionated extracts. Purified nuclei contained, in addition to a complex mixture of high molecular mass ubiquitinated proteins, a strongly immunoreactive 28-kDa protein. In the apoplastic extract, we did not detect any ubiquitinated proteins enriched above the background level of those due to cytosolic contamination. Vacuoles appeared to contribute significantly to the ubiquitinated proteins present in the whole protoplast extract. At least three high molecular mass ubiquitinated proteins were unique to the vacuolar extract. Chloroplast stromal proteins did not react specifically with anti-ubiquitin antibodies. When microsomal ubiquitinated proteins were compared to those found in a whole protoplast extract, a distinct pattern was evident. Microsomal ubiquitinated proteins were not visible in the 10,000 x g supernatant used to prepare the 100,000 x g pellet, indicating that they were probably low abundance proteins in the protoplast extract.