RESUMEN

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications after appendectomy, which carries high associated morbidity. Therefore, it is essential to determine SSI predictive factors in order to prevent its occurrence. The aim of this study is to explore the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of SSI after appendectomy in children. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed in children who underwent appendectomy between 2017-2020. Demographics, time since symptoms onset, laboratory tests at admission, ultrasound appendiceal diameter, rate of complicated appendicitis, surgical aproach, surgery time and SSI rate were analyzed. Follow-up was performed during hospitalization and at outpatient clinic at 2 weeks and 30 days postoperatively to assess the surgical wound aspect. Diagnostic cut-off values of these markers for SSI prediction were based on the significance in the univariate analysis. Variables with a P value <0.05 in the univariate analysis were then entered into the multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 1,136 patients (710 males; 426 females) were included. SSI was reported in 53 patients (4.7%) during the 30-day follow-up after appendectomy (SSI group), with no demographic differences with the control group. Time since symptoms onset was significantly higher in SSI group (24 vs. 18 hours; P=0.034), as well as ultrasound appendiceal diameter (10.5 vs. 8.5 mm; P=0.010). Complicated appendicitis was observed in about 60% of both groups, without differences in surgical approach between them. Surgery time was statistically higher in the SSI group (62.4 vs. 47.9 min; P<0.001). SSI group presented higher counts of leukocytes, neutrophils and NLR than control group (P<0.001). NLR was the parameter with the highest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC =0.808; P<0.001), with a cut-off point of 9.8 with maximum sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (72.7%). NLR was an independent predictive factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 1.82 (1.13-2.73); P<0.01]. Conclusions: NLR value at admission was the most promising predictive factor for the development of SSI in children undergoing appendectomy. It is an easy, simple, inexpensive, and rapid method to detect patients at high risk for SSI. However, further prospective studies are still needed to confirm these results.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Partial onychectomy with chemical matrixectomy is considered the gold standard treatment for stage II-III ingrown toenails (IT). However, there are scarce reports describing the use of silver nitrate in IT management in adolescents. Our aim is to analyze the effectiveness of matrix ablation with silver nitrate and compare it with partial onychectomy by electrocautery. METHODS: A retrospective study of adolescent patients with stage II-III IT was performed. Those who underwent electrocautery matricectomy in a major outpatient surgical center (Group A) and those who were treated with silver nitrate at an outpatient clinic (Group B) were compared. Efficacy was determined by recurrence and postoperative infection rates. RESULTS: Two hundred and nine patients were included (86 group A; 123 group B), with a total of 382 partial onychectomies (151 group A; 231 group B). Group B patients exhibited a lower recurrence rate (4.7%) when compared to group A (11.2%, p = .02), and had a lower postoperative infection rate (4.0% group A vs. 1.7% group B; p = .18), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Silver nitrate chemical matricectomy after partial onychectomy is an effective treatment for IT in adolescents, with few postoperative complications and low recurrence rate. Therefore, it should be considered as a possible alternative to electrocautery matricectomy.

Asunto(s)

Uñas Encarnadas , Uñas , Adolescente , Humanos , Nitrato de Plata/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia , Uñas Encarnadas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias

RESUMEN

Indocyanine green (ICG)-guided near-infrared fluorescence has been recently adopted in pediatric surgery, although its use in the treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism has not been reported. We present a case of focal congenital hyperinsulinism in which ICG-navigation with ICG was used during surgical treatment. A 3-month-old infant was referred to our institution from a peripheral hospital for episodes of persistent hypoglycemia since birth, with no response to intravenous treatment with diazoxide, octreotide, or hydrochlorothiazide. An abdominal positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan showed a hypermetabolic nodule in the proximal portion of the body of the pancreas, compatible with focal congenital hyperinsulinism. A heterozygous mutation in the ABCC gene (Ala1516Glyfs*19) frameshift type inherited from the father was identified, which supported this diagnosis. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery was performed with ICG-guided near-infrared fluorescence, with intravenous injection of 16 mg ICG (2 mg/mg), which allowed localization of the focal lesion in the body of the pancreas. The lesion was resected with bipolar electrocautery and intraoperative histological study confirmed complete resection. Plasma glucose values normalized 6 hours after surgery and the patient was discharged 5 days later. In conclusion, the use of ICG in the treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism helps to identify hypermetabolic pancreatic nodules, decreasing the likelihood of incomplete resection.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention is usually a traumatic event that causes stress and anxiety in the pediatric patient and the family environment. To reduce the harmful effects of presurgical anxiety, parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA) is one of the more notable interventions used in medical centers. However, data on this measure are difficult to evaluate and often face resistance from healthcare staff. AIM: To analyze the perception of the healthcare workers after the implementation of a PPIA program. METHODS: A survey was developed and sent by email to all the healthcare staff working in the children's area of a tertiary hospital. It consisted of 14 items divided into positive aspects of PPIA and negative aspects of PPIA evaluated with the use of a Likert scale (1 to 5). The demographics of the respondents were included in the data collected. The answers to the questions were interpreted through the Net Promoter Score (NPS). The statistical analysis compared the differences in the responses to each question of the survey made by the different groups of health personnel included. RESULTS: A total of 141 surveys were sent out, with a response rate of 69%. Of the total number of responses, 68% were from women and 32% from men. The average age of the participants was 42.3 ± 10.6 years. As for the positive questions about the PPIA, 83% had an NPS > 50, and only one had a score between 0 and 50, which means that the quality of the service was rated as excellent or good by 100% of the respondents. On the other hand, 100% of the negative questions about the PPIA had a negative NPS. Responses to the question "PPIA increases patient safety" were significantly different (P = 0.037), with a lower percentage of pediatric surgeons (70%) thinking that PPIA increased patient safety, compared with anesthesiologists (90%), nursing (92%), and other medical personnel (96%). CONCLUSION: The personnel who participated in the PPIA program at our center were in favor of implementation. There were no validated arguments to support worker resistance to the development of the PPIA.