RESUMEN

The purpose of the study was to examine if the higher susceptibility at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared to 1.5 T will affect the contrast in MR imaging of the liver after application of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (SPIO). The study was approved by our institutional review board and informed consent was obtained. Seventeen healthy volunteers were examined in a prospective, intra-individual comparative study within one day on a 1.5 T and a 3.0 T MRI system. T2 weighted TSE sequences were acquired after bolus injection of a SPIO contrast agent. Image contrast and signal to noise ratio (SNR) were compared between the field strengths. Image contrast was calculated between the liver tissue and the kidneys / spleen / muscles and fluids. The students'T-test was used for statistical analysis. No influence of the higher field strength could be observed on image contrast except for the liver / muscle contrast. This was due to a distinct SNR increase of the muscle tissue at 3.0 T as a result of their relaxation properties. The higher susceptibility at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T does not translate into a stronger signal attenuation of the SPIO enhanced liver parenchyma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To establish a pulse sequence for dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast at 3.0 T and to prospectively compare MR imaging at 3.0 T with MR imaging at 1.5 T in the same patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective intraindividual internal review board-approved study was performed in 37 women with 53 lesions (25 breast cancers, 28 benign focal lesions) who underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic bilateral subtraction MR imaging twice, once at 1.5 T with a standard technique (voxel size, 1.44 mm3) and once at 3.0 T (voxel size, 0.45-0.72 mm3) with variable repetition time and flip angle settings. Written informed consent was obtained. Sagittal single breast high-spatial-resolution MR imaging was performed with active fat suppression. Image quality, number and features of enhancing lesions, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were compared by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and Student t test for matched pairs. Diagnostic confidence was compared by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: With repetition time prolonged to account for longer T1 relaxation times at 3.0 T and a flip angle of 60 degrees, enhancement rates at 3.0 T were substantially below those at 1.5 T. In two patients with benign lesions, enhancement was rated as insufficient to establish diagnosis. When parameter settings were kept equivalent, equivalent enhancement rates were observed with both systems. With these settings, 3.0-T MR imaging yielded homogeneous signal intensity over the entire field of view. No dielectric resonance effects were observed. Overall image quality scores for the dynamic series were slightly higher at 3.0 T (P<.01). A total of 49 lesions were prospectively identified with both systems. Owing to substantial patient motion at 1.5 T, two malignant lesions in one patient were visualized at 3.0 T only. At 3.0 T, differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions was possible with higher diagnostic confidence, as reflected by a larger area under the ROC curve (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Initial experiences indicate that contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T is nearing readiness for clinical use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution in dynamic contrast material-enhanced bilateral magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent and institutional review board approval were obtained. An intraindividual comparative study was performed in 30 patients (mean age, 53 years; age range, 27-70 years) with a total of 54 enhancing lesions (28 benign and 26 malignant) who underwent dynamic MR imaging of the breast twice, once with a standard dynamic protocol (256 x 256 matrix, 69 seconds per acquisition) and once on a separate day with a modified dynamic protocol (400 x 512 matrix, 116 seconds per acquisition). Systematic qualitative analysis of morphologic features and region-of-interest-based analysis of enhancement kinetics were performed. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (generalized linear modeling) in enhancement rates of benign versus malignant lesions was lost when moving from the standard to the modified dynamic protocol. Kinetic information on signal intensity time course patterns was preserved. Delineation of lesion margins and internal architecture was clearly superior with the modified dynamic protocol, which allowed identification of lesion features associated with high positive predictive value or high negative predictive value for breast cancer. Ten benign lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 with the standard protocol were correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 2 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of internal septations. Thirteen malignant lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 3 or 4 with the standard protocol were correctly upgraded to BI-RADS category 4 or 5 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of spicules or rim enhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significantly larger area under the curve for results obtained with the modified dynamic protocol. CONCLUSION: Increased spatial resolution significantly improves diagnostic confidence and accuracy at dynamic MR imaging, even if this improvement occurs at the expense of temporal resolution. Loss of kinetic information regarding enhancement rates proved to be not diagnostically relevant because enhancement rates showed broad overlap between benign and malignant lesions and were therefore of only limited diagnostic use in the individual patient. Kinetic information regarding time course pattern was preserved and confirmed as having high specificity and high positive predictive value.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the degree and prevalence of radiation-induced changes on breast magnetic resonance (MR) images in patients who were undergoing radiation therapy at that time or soon after, to assess prospectively whether possible radiation-induced effects impair diagnostic accuracy of imaging, and to investigate the prevalence of residual ipsilateral and synchronous contralateral breast cancer in patients undergoing radiation therapy after resection of a supposedly solitary breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 116 dynamic bilateral breast MR studies were performed during and up to 12 months after radiation therapy in 72 patients who had undergone breast-conservation surgery without preoperative MR imaging. Patients were assigned to four groups according to the time span between imaging and radiation therapy. Structural changes, parenchymal enhancement pattern, and prevalence and imaging features of incidental lesions were analyzed and compared with those of the nonirradiated breast. RESULTS: Radiation therapy led to parenchymal edema and a significant (two-tailed paired Student t test) increase in enhancement rates in the irradiated compared with those in the contralateral breasts during and up to 3 months after radiation therapy. Neither during nor at any time after radiation therapy did the mean enhancement rates reach diagnostically relevant rates. Unsuspected residual or recurrent breast cancers were identified in irradiated breasts of five patients and in contralateral breasts of two patients. False-positive MR findings resulted in a biopsy in three patients with irradiated and in one patient with nonirradiated breasts. There was no difference in enhancement kinetics or morphology of benign or malignant lesions in irradiated versus nonirradiated breasts. CONCLUSION: Radiation-induced changes occur at MR imaging during or up to 3 months after radiation therapy but are much less severe than reported. Detection and characterization of lesions were feasible with comparable diagnostic accuracies in irradiated and nonirradiated breasts.

Asunto(s)