Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 26(7): 127-134, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37585154

RESUMEN

Despite extensive work on macrosomia, it is impossible to predict women at risk. Current prediction strategies which include clinical examination and ultrasound are imprecise. This study aims to determine the risk factors associated with macrosomia. It was a descriptive, retrospective chart review of women delivered of macrosomic neonates over a two-year period from 2015-2016. Detailed clinical and demographic information was recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 25.0 IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Of 22 244 singleton deliveries, 415 were macrosomic infants (1.9%). The mean birth weight for macrosomic infants was 4.39 ± 0.43 (range 4-5.15) kg and males were more in number and weight. Macrosomic infants occurred more in age groups 25-29 years and peaked with BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Majority were cesarean sections compared to vaginal deliveries (56.6% vs 43.4%; p=0.006) respectively. Vaginal delivery of macrosomic infants was associated with complications. Significant differences were found between fetal macrosomia and clinical characteristics such as body mass index, parity, advanced maternal age, and male fetal sex. Hypoglycaemia was most frequent in infants born to non-diabetic mothers (98.1%). Antenatal risk factors are important in the prediction of macrosomia, but fetal and maternal outcome depends on labour management.


Asunto(s)
Macrosomía Fetal , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Embarazo , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Macrosomía Fetal/epidemiología , Macrosomía Fetal/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Peso al Nacer , Factores de Riesgo , Paridad
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 155(3): 455-465, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499750

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe risk factors and outcomes of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to South African healthcare facilities. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted utilizing an amended International Obstetric Surveillance System protocol. Data on pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalized between April 14, 2020, and November 24, 2020, were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 hospitals submitted data on 673 infected hospitalized pregnant women; 217 (32.2%) were admitted for COVID-19 illness and 456 for other indications. There were 39 deaths with a case fatality rate of 6.3%: 32 (14.7%) deaths occurred in women admitted for COVID-19 illness compared to 7 (1.8%) in women admitted for other indications. Of the women, 106 (15.9%) required critical care. Maternal tuberculosis, but not HIV co-infection or other co-morbidities, was associated with admission for COVID-19 illness. Rates of cesarean delivery did not differ significantly between women admitted for COVID-19 and those admitted for other indications. There were 179 (35.4%) preterm births, 25 (4.7%) stillbirths, 12 (2.3%) neonatal deaths, and 162 (30.8%) neonatal admissions. Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly from those of infected women admitted for other indications. CONCLUSION: The maternal mortality rate was high among women admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection and higher in women admitted primarily for COVID-19 illness with tuberculosis being the only co-morbidity associated with admission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mujeres Embarazadas , SARS-CoV-2 , Sudáfrica/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA