RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several novel drugs are dramatically improving both lifespan and quality-of-life of patients with blood cancers. AIM: Prolonged disease duration and increased treatment costs for hematologic malignancies impose a relevant economic burden onto healthcare services, despite the low incidence of blood cancers. Therefore, an appropriate paradigm for valuing 'innovation' is urgently required in order to refine pricing and reimbursement decisions. Cost-per-QALY-gained is still the standard metric for assessing the 'incremental' value of new drugs; however, the high number of 'comparator' therapies and the huge variety of treatment sequences make plain two-treatment comparisons sub-optimal, while multiple-treatment and multiple-sequence comparisons require complex and less-transparent decision models. A repository of standard backbones for decision models might allow benchmarking and comparability among cost-effectiveness analyses; however, an international effort is required to build it up. RESULTS: Deontology recommends that hematologists act in optimizing healthcare resources while preserving patient-physician alliance, but clinical practice guidelines do not support doctors in balancing cost against clinical outcomes. Decision models of chronic blood cancers unexpectedly proved that cost might be an appropriate value for innovation if treatments avoided severe toxicity and further lines of treatments, despite the eventually long duration of treatment and the competing risk of death due to comorbidity and old age. CONCLUSION: The improved transparency of decision models allows sharing of relevant structural and analytic parameters (i.e., time horizon, comparator treatments, hierarchy of end-point, assumptions, source of data, sub-group analyses) by stakeholders, physicians and patients, making health economics a noble 'translator' of values for innovation.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/economía , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Factores de Edad , Enfermedad Crónica , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Econométricos , Participación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Trials to determine the effect of thalidomide in patients with Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia (MMM) have produced inconclusive results due to different criteria for response and heterogeneous study participants. We undertook a pooled-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment on a larger series of cases and with a uniform assessment of response. We used updated data on 62 individual patients from 5 phase II trials that evaluated thalidomide therapy in MMM patients. Responsewas judged on individual disease parameters, on the improvement of the Dupriez risk categories and on the improvement of a 6 point "severity score" based on myeloproliferative and myelodepletive indexes of the disease. Overall, using standard dose of thalidomide, i.e. starting with no less than 100 mg/day, 49 patients (79%) had more than 4 weeks of therapy. Twenty-nine percent of patients with moderate to severe anemia showed an increase in hemoglobin or reduction/abolishment of blood transfusion requirements, 38% with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia had an increase in platelet counts, and 41% with high grade splenomegaly demonstrated a measurable reduction in splenic size. These effects led to an absolute decrease in the "severity" score in 44.9% of the patients. Major disease severity and high degrees of splenomegaly before therapy predicted response with a probability of 61.9%. However, worsening of the "severity" score was observed in 20.4% of the patients, 18% having a "myeloproliferative reaction" with leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis. Sixty-six percent of the patients discontinued the drug before 6 months of treatment due to intolerance. In conclusion, there is a small but clear improvement of disease severity with thalidomide therapy in MMM. The potential for myeloproliferative reactions and the unfavorable dose-related toxicity profile argue for future studies using lower doses of this drug.