Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phys Sportsmed ; 51(4): 371-378, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968574

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with those of isolated ACL reconstruction and evaluate the re-rupture rate between the two study groups. METHODS: This prospective RCT included 58 patients (43 men and 15 women) who underwent ACL reconstruction, either isolated (Group I: 26 patients) or combined with the ALL reconstruction (Group II: 32 patients). Preoperatively, the two groups differed in age and rate of medial meniscal injuries. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively during the time points corresponding to 6 (T1) weeks, 12 (T2) weeks, 6 (T3) months, 12 (T4) months, and 24 (T5) months. The evaluation included the clinical examination (comprising Lachman test, Pivot Shift test, Range of Motion, and Rolimeter differential anterior laxity), the objective clinical score (Objective IKDC [The International Knee Documentation Committee] score), and the subjective clinical scores (comprising Subjective IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score). The postoperative complications of all the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Both the groups reported a significant improvement in clinical scores during the final follow-up as compared to the preoperative value (p < 0.05). The only differences between the two groups were observed with respect to the pivot shift test during each follow-up, wherein more patients from group I reported a pivot shift test grade I as compared to group II (p < 0.05). Three patients from group I reported a re-rupture of the operated knee, whereas no patients from group II reported new ruptures (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction has proven to be more effective in obtaining a high grade of rotational knee stability during mid-term follow-up as compared to isolated ACL reconstruction along with a significantly lower rate of re-ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: Randomized Clinical Trial. REGISTRATION: researchregistry5873: www.researchregistry.com.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Rotura/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA