Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Neurol ; 77(1): 35-42, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498371

RESUMEN

Importance: Many studies have investigated the imaging findings showing sequelae of repetitive head trauma, with mixed results. Objective: To determine whether fighters (boxers and mixed martial arts fighters) with cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) and cavum vergae (CV) have reduced volumes in various brain structures or worse clinical outcomes on cognitive and mood testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed participants from the Professional Fighters Brain Health Study. Data were collected from April 14, 2011, to January 17, 2018, and were analyzed from September 1, 2018, to May 23, 2019. This study involved a referred sample of 476 active and retired professional fighters. Eligible participants were at least 18 years of age and had at least a fourth-grade reading level. Healthy age-matched controls with no history of trauma were also enrolled. Exposures: Presence of CSP, CV, and their total (additive) length (CSPV length). Main Outcomes and Measures: Information regarding depression, impulsivity, and sleepiness among study participants was obtained using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale, Barrett Impulsiveness Scale, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Cognition was assessed using raw scores from CNS Vital Signs. Volumes of various brain structures were measured via magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 476 fighters (440 men, 36 women; mean [SD] age, 30.0 [8.2] years [range, 18-72 years]) and 63 control participants (57 men, 6 women; mean [SD] age, 30.8 [9.6] years [range, 18-58 years]) were enrolled in the study. Compared with fighters without CV, fighters with CV had significantly lower mean psychomotor speed (estimated difference, -11.3; 95% CI, -17.4 to -5.2; P = .004) and lower mean volumes in the supratentorium (estimated difference, -31 191 mm3; 95% CI, -61 903 to -479 mm3; P = .05) and other structures. Longer CSPV length was associated with lower processing speed (slope, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.28; P < .001), psychomotor speed (slope, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.32; P < .001), and lower brain volumes in the supratentorium (slope, -1072 mm3 for every 1-mm increase in CSPV length; 95% CI, -1655 to -489 mm3; P < .001) and other structures. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that the presence of CSP and CV is associated with lower regional brain volumes and cognitive performance in a cohort exposed to repetitive head trauma.


Asunto(s)
Boxeo/lesiones , Encéfalo/patología , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/complicaciones , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/patología , Artes Marciales/lesiones , Adolescente , Adulto , Afecto/fisiología , Anciano , Cognición/fisiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/etiología , Tabique Pelúcido/patología , Adulto Joven
2.
Phys Ther ; 100(1): 136-148, 2020 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31584666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standardization of care along disease lines is recommended to improve outcomes and reduce health care costs. The multiple disciplines involved in concussion management often result in fragmented and disparate care. A fundamental gap exists in the effective utilization of rehabilitation services for individuals with concussion. PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to (1) characterize changes in health care utilization following implementation of a concussion carepath, and (2) present an economic evaluation of patient charges following carepath implementation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A review of electronic medical and financial records was conducted of individuals (N = 3937), ages 18 to 45 years, with primary diagnosis of concussion who sought care in the outpatient or emergency department settings over a 7-year period (2010-2016). Outcomes including encounter length, resource utilization, and charges were compared for each year to determine changes from pre- to post-carepath implementation. RESULTS: Concussion volumes increased by 385% from 2010 to 2015. Utilization of physical therapy increased from 9% to 20% while time to referral decreased from 72 to 23 days post-injury. Utilization of emergency medicine and imaging were significantly reduced. Efficient resource utilization led to a 20.7% decrease in median charges (estimated ratio of means [CI] 7.72 [0.53, 0.96]) associated with concussion care. LIMITATIONS: Encounter lengths served as a proxy for recovery time. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the concussion carepath was successful in optimizing clinical practice with respect to facilitating continuity of care, appropriate resource utilization, and effective handoffs to physical therapy. The utilization of enabling technology to facilitate the collection of common outcomes across providers was vital to the success of standardizing clinical care without compromising patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/rehabilitación , Ahorro de Costo , Aplicaciones Móviles , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Conmoción Encefálica/economía , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Vías Clínicas , Recolección de Datos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
J Vis Exp ; (143)2019 01 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30735197

RESUMEN

The evidence-informed standardization of care along disease lines is recommended to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. The aim of this project is to 1) describe the development and implementation of the Concussion Carepath, 2) demonstrate the process of integrating technology in the form of a mobile application to enable the carepath and guide clinical decision-making, and 3) present data on the utility of the C3 app in facilitating decision-making throughout the injury recovery process. A multi-disciplinary team of experts in concussion care was formed to develop an evidence-informed algorithm, outlining best practices for the clinical management of concussion along three phases of recovery - acute, subacute, and post-concussive. A custom mobile application, the Cleveland Clinic Concussion (C3) app was developed and validated to provide a platform for the systematic collection of objective, biomechanical outcomes and to provide guidance in clinical decision-making in the field and clinical environments. The Cleveland Clinic Concussion app included an electronic incident report, assessment modules to measure important aspects of cognitive and motor function, and a return to play module to systematically document the six phases of post-injury rehabilitation. The assessment modules served as qualifiers within the carepath algorithm, driving referral for specialty services as indicated. Overall, the carepath coupled with the C3 app functioned in unison to facilitate communication among the interdisciplinary team, prevent stagnant care, and drive patients to the right provider at the right time for efficient and effective clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/rehabilitación , Vías Clínicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Algoritmos , Toma de Decisiones , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aplicaciones Móviles , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto Joven
4.
Global Spine J ; 8(5): 498-506, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30258756

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. OBJECTIVES: Given the lack of strong evidence/guidelines on appropriate treatment for lumbar spine disease, substantial variability exists among surgical treatments utilized, which is associated with differences in costs to treat a given pathology. Our goal was to investigate the variability in costs among spine surgeons nationally for the same pathology in similar patients. METHODS: Four hundred forty-five spine surgeons completed a survey of clinical and radiographic case scenarios on patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation, low back pain, and spondylolisthesis. Those surveyed were asked to provide various details including their geographical location, specialty, and fellowship training. Treatment options included no surgery, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterolateral fusion, and transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Costs were estimated via Medicare national payment amounts. RESULTS: For recurrent lumbar disc herniation, no difference in costs existed for patients undergoing their first revision microdiscectomy. However, for patients undergoing another microdiscectomy, surgeons who operated <100 times/year had significantly lower costs than those who operated >200 times/year (P < .001) and those with 5-15 years of experience had significantly higher costs than those with >15 years (P < .001). For the treatment of low back pain, academic surgeons kept costs about 55% lower than private practice surgeons (P < .001). In the treatment of spondylolisthesis, there was significant treatment variability without significant differences in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in surgical treatment paradigms exists for different pathologies. Understanding why variability in treatment selection exists in similar clinical contexts across practices is important to ensure the most cost-effective delivery of care among spine surgeons.

5.
World Neurosurg ; 111: e564-e572, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288862

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are a multitude of treatments for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. There are no clear guidelines for the optimal approach. OBJECTIVE: To identify the surgical treatment patterns for spondylolisthesis among United States spine surgeons. METHODS: 445 spine surgeons in the United States completed a survey of clinical/radiographic case scenarios on patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic claudication with (S+BP) or without (S-BP) associated mechanical back pain. Treatment options included decompression, laminectomy with posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, or none of the above. The primary outcome measure was the probability of 2 randomly chosen surgeons disagreeing on the treatment method. RESULTS: There was 64% disagreement (36% agreement) among surgeons for treatment of spondylolisthesis with mechanical back pain (S+BP) and 71% disagreement (29% agreement) for spondylolisthesis without mechanical back pain (S-BP). For S+BP, disagreement was 52% for those practicing 5 to 10 years versus 70% among those practicing more than 20 years. Orthopedic surgeons had greater disagreement than did neurosurgeons (76% vs. 56%) for S+BP. Greater clinical equipoise was seen for S-BP than for S+BP regardless of surgeon characteristics. For spondylolisthesis without mechanical back pain, neurosurgeons were significantly more likely to select decompression-only than were orthopedic surgeons, who more commonly selected fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical equipoise exists for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. Differences are greater when the patient presents without associated back pain. Surgeon case volume, practice duration, and specialty training influence operative decisions for a given pathologic condition. Recognizing this practice variation will hopefully lead to better evidence and practice guidelines for the optimal and most cost-effective treatment paradigms.


Asunto(s)
Neurocirujanos , Neurocirugia/normas , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Laminectomía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis/complicaciones , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
6.
Clin Spine Surg ; 30(9): E1227-E1232, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125437

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Compare improvements in health status measures (HSMs) and surgical costs to determine whether use of more costly items has any relationship to clinical outcome and value in lumbar disc surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Association between cost, outcomes, and value in spine surgery, including lumbar discectomy is poorly understood. Outcomes were calculated as difference in mean HSM scores between preoperative and postoperative timeframes. Prospective validated patient-reported HSMs studied were EuroQol quality of life index score (EQ-5D), Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Surgical costs consisted of disposable items and implants used in operating room. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all adult patients at Cleveland Clinic main campus between October 2009 and August 2013 who underwent lumbar discectomy (652) using administrative billing data, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 63030. HSMs were obtained from Cleveland Clinic Knowledge Program Data Registry. RESULTS: In total, 67% of operations performed in the outpatient or ambulatory setting, 33% in the inpatient setting. Among 9 surgeons who performed >10 lumbar discectomies, there were 72.4 operations per surgeon, on average. Mean surgical costs of each surgeon differed (P<0.0001). In a multivariable regression, only the surgeon and surgery type (outpatient or inpatient) were statistically correlated with surgical costs (P<0.0001 and 0.046, respectively). Changes in EQ-5D, PDQ, and PHQ-9 were not correlated with surgical costs (P=0.76, 0.07, 0.76, respectively). In multivariable regression, only surgical cost was significantly correlated to mean difference in PDQ (P=0.030). More costly surgeries resulted in worse PDQ outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Mean surgical costs varied statistically among 9 surgeons; costs were not shown to be positively correlated with patient outcomes. Performing an operation using more costly disposable supplies/implants does not seem to improve patient outcomes and should be considered when constructing preference cards and during an operation.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía/economía , Equipos Desechables/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Demografía , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Análisis de Regresión
7.
Neurosurgery ; 79(6): 889-894, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27465846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) contributes significantly to postoperative morbidity and mortality and greatly increases the cost of care. OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of workflow and personnel-related risk factors contributing to the incidence of SSIs in a large sample of neurological surgeries. METHODS: Data were obtained using an enterprisewide electronic health record system, operating room, and anesthesia records for neurological procedures conducted between January 1, 2009, and November 30, 2012. SSI data were obtained from prospective surveillance by infection preventionists using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. A multivariate model was constructed and refined using backward elimination logistic regression methods. RESULTS: The analysis included 12 528 procedures. Most cases were elective (94.5%), and the average procedure length was 4.8 hours. The average number of people present in the operating room at any time during the procedure was 10.0. The overall infection rate was 2.3%. Patient body mass index (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04) and sex (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72) as well as procedure length (odds ratio, 1.19 per additional hour; 95% CI, 1.15-1.23) and nursing staff turnovers (odds ratio, 1.095 per additional turnover; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21) were significantly correlated with the risk of SSI. CONCLUSION: This study found that patient body mass index and male sex were associated with an increased risk of SSI. Operating room personnel turnover, a modifiable, work flow-related factor, was an independent variable positively correlated with SSI. This study suggests that efforts to reduce operating room turnover may be effective in preventing SSI. ABBREVIATIONS: OR, operating roomSSI, surgical site infection.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Quirófanos , Reorganización del Personal , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Recursos Humanos
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 41(11): 978-986, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26679881

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Electronic survey. OBJECTIVE: To identify the surgical treatment patterns for low back pain (LBP), among U.S. spine surgeons. Specifically determine (1) differences in surgical treatment responses based on various demographic variables; (2) probability of disagreement based on surgeon subgroups. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multiple surgical and nonsurgical treatments exist for LBP. Without strong evidence or clear guidelines for the indications and optimal treatments, there is substantial variability in surgical treatments used. METHODS: A total of 445 U.S. spine surgeons completed a survey of clinical and radiographic case scenarios on patients with mechanical LBP, no leg pain, and concordant discograms. Surgical treatment options included no surgery, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterolateral fusion with pedicle screws, transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF), etc. Statistical significance was set at 0.01 to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There was substantial clinical equipoise (∼75% disagreement) among surgeons on the approach to treat patients with LBP. Disagreement was highest in the southwest and lowest in the Midwest (82% vs. 69%, respectively); there was significantly lower disagreement among those in academic practices versus those in private/hybrid practices (56% vs.79%, respectively). Those in academic practices had approximately four times greater odds of choosing no surgery as compared to those in hybrid and private practices, who were more likely to choose ALIF or PLIF/TLIF. Those with fellowship training had approximately two times greater odds of selecting no surgery and four times greater odds of selecting ALIF as compared to those without fellowship training who were more likely to select TLIF/PLIF. CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist among U.S. spine surgeons in the treatment of LBP. These differences stem from geographical location of the practice, specialty, practice type, and fellowship training. Recognizing the substantial variability underlies the importance of additional studies aimed at identifying the proper indications and most cost-effective treatments for LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/cirugía , Cirujanos/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 21(3): 475-80, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24949902

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Spondylolysis is a common condition among the general population and a major cause of back pain in young athletes. This condition can be difficult to detect with plain radiography and has been reported to lead to contralateral pars fracture or pedicle fracture in the terminal stages. Interestingly, some patients with late-stage spondylolysis are observed to have radiographic or CT evidence of a sclerotic pedicle on the side contralateral to the spondylolysis. Although computational studies have shown stress elevation in the contralateral pedicle after a pars fracture, it is not known if these changes would cause sclerotic changes in the contralateral pedicle. The objective of this study was to investigate the adaptive remodeling process at the pedicle due to a contralateral spondylolysis using finite element analysis. METHODS: A multiscale finite element model of a vertebra was obtained by combining a continuum model of the posterior elements with a voxel-based pedicle section. Extension loading conditions were applied with or without a fracture at the contralateral pars to analyze the stresses in the contralateral pedicle. A remodeling algorithm was used to simulate and assess density changes in the contralateral pedicle. RESULTS: The remodeling algorithm demonstrated an increase in bone formation around the perimeter of the contralateral pedicle with some localized loss of mass in the region of cancellous bone. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results indicated that a pars fracture results in sclerotic changes in the contralateral pedicle. Such a remodeling process could increase overall bone mass. However, focal bone loss in the region of the cancellous bone of the pedicle might predispose the pedicle to microfractures. This phenomenon explains, at least in part, the origin of pedicle stress fractures in the sclerotic contralateral pedicles of patients with unilateral spondylolysis.


Asunto(s)
Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Espondilólisis/complicaciones , Algoritmos , Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Espondilólisis/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
10.
Spine J ; 14(10): 2334-43, 2014 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24462813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are often multiple surgical treatment options for a spinal pathology. In addition, there is a lack of data that define differences in surgical treatment among surgeons in the United States. PURPOSE: To assess the surgical treatment patterns among neurologic and orthopedic spine surgeons in the United States for the treatment of one- and two-time recurrent lumbar disc herniation. STUDY DESIGN: Electronic survey. PATIENT SAMPLE: An electronic survey was delivered to 2,560 orthopedic and neurologic surgeons in the United States. OUTCOME MEASURES: The response data were analyzed to assess the differences among respondents over various demographic variables. The probability of disagreement is reported for various surgeon subgroups. METHODS: A survey of clinical and radiographic case scenarios that included a one- and two-time lumbar disc herniation was electronically delivered to 2,560 orthopedic and neurologic surgeons in the United States. The surgical treatment options were revision microdiscectomy, revision microdiscectomy with in situ fusion, revision microdiscectomy with posterolateral fusion using pedicle screws, revision microdiscectomy with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with percutaneous screws, ALIF with open posterior instrumentation, or none of these. Significance of p=.01 was used to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-five surgeons (18%) completed the survey. Surgeons in practice for 15+ years were more likely to select revision microdiscectomy compared with surgeons with fewer years in practice who were more likely to select revision microdiscectomy with PLIF/TLIF (p<.001). Similarly, those surgeons performing 200+ surgeries per year were more likely to select revision microdiscectomy with PLIF/TLIF than those performing fewer surgeries (p=.003). No significant differences were identified for region, specialty, fellowship training, or practice type. Overall, there was a 69% and 22% probability that two randomly selected spine surgeons would disagree on the surgical treatment of two- and one-time recurrent disc herniations, respectively. This probability of disagreement was consistent over multiple variables including geographic, practice type, fellowship training, and annual case volume. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist among US spine surgeons in the surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniations. It will become increasingly important to understand the underlying reasons for these differences and to define the most cost-effective surgical strategies for these common lumbar pathologies as the United States moves closer to a value-based health-care system.


Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Discectomía , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Microdisección , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Radiografía , Recurrencia , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Estados Unidos
11.
Skeletal Radiol ; 40(9): 1175-89, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21847748

RESUMEN

One of the most common indications for performing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the lumbar spine is the symptom complex thought to originate as a result of degenerative disk disease. MR imaging, which has emerged as perhaps the modality of choice for imaging degenerative disk disease, can readily demonstrate disk pathology, degenerative endplate changes, facet and ligamentous hypertrophic changes, and the sequelae of instability. Its role in terms of predicting natural history of low back pain, identifying causality, or offering prognostic information is unclear. As available modalities for imaging the spine have progressed from radiography, myelography, and computed tomography to MR imaging, there have also been advances in spine surgery for degenerative disk disease. These advances are described in a temporal context for historical purposes with a focus on MR imaging's history and current state.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía
12.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 36(23): 1955-60, 2011 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21304422

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact that routine postoperative radiographs have in clinical outcome and clinical decision-making. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No standard exists that outlines how often and when radiographs should be taken after lumbar fusion. Routine postoperative radiographs can be a source of inconvenience and cost to patients, radiation exposure, and possibly, confounding information. METHODS: The patients who underwent a single or multilevel lumbar instrumented fusion were investigated. At each time-point after surgery, it was noted if they demonstrated new symptoms or clinical deterioration. The Fisher exact test was used to analyze the categorical data. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (25 males and 38 females) were identified with a mean age of 52 years (range, 20-87). Plain radiographs were taken at 269 visits including all time-points. In 17 (6.3%) visits, abnormal findings were found in 13 patients, including suspected pseudoarthrosis on radiographs (n = 10) and adjacent segment disease on radiographs (n = 3). They were found during 11 of 50 visits (22%) in the patients with new symptoms or clinical deterioration and during 6 of 219 visits (2.7%) in the asymptomatic patients. The probability of an abnormal finding was significantly lower in the asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001). Before the 6-month follow-up, abnormal findings were found in 1 of 111 visits (0.9%) and in 16 of 158 visits (10%) at the 6-month follow-up or later. The probability of an abnormal finding was significantly lower before the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). In six of the seven symptomatic patients (86%) with suspected pseudoarthrosis on radiographs, pseudoarthrosis was initially suspected between 6 and 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that plain radiographs should be performed as indicated clinically rather than routinely after instrumented lumbar fusion. The vast majority of asymptomatic patients do not require routine postoperative radiographs.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Periodo Posoperatorio , Seudoartrosis/diagnóstico , Seudoartrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
13.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 4(9): 604-11, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17845965

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The authors performed a pilot randomized controlled trial of total-body screening to assess the feasibility of a full-scale study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After informed consent, 50 asymptomatic people were randomized to either the intervention arm (total-body screening with multidetector computed tomography) or the control arm (no screening for 3 years). The study was approved by our institutional review board and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Images were interpreted independently by 6 radiologists from 2 institutions. Subjects in both study arms completed periodic health questionnaires and medical utilization forms over 2 years. Key outcome variables were the incidence of symptomatic disease, medical costs, and patient-reported health. RESULTS: Sixteen screened subjects (64%) had abnormal findings on screening. A second interpretation of the images yielded a similar overall rate but with considerable variability at the subject level. No cancers were detected. Ninety percent of subjects were compliant at 2 years. Medical costs were twice as high for screened subjects, with considerable between-subject variability. Screened subjects reported fewer physical limitations than unscreened subjects. CONCLUSION: A full-scale randomized controlled trial of total-body screening will need to account for the large interreader variability in interpreting the images, the high rate of incidental findings, and the low prevalence of cancers. A full-scale study using mortality as the endpoint does not seem feasible at this time.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/métodos , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/economía
14.
Radiology ; 245(1): 43-61, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17885180

RESUMEN

The sequelae of disk degeneration are among the leading causes of functional incapacity in both sexes and are a common source of chronic disability in the working years. Disk degeneration involves structural disruption and cell-mediated changes in composition. Mechanical, traumatic, nutritional, and genetic factors all may play a role in the cascade of disk degeneration, albeit to variable degree in different individuals. The presence of degenerative change is by no means an indicator of symptoms, and there is a very high prevalence in asymptomatic individuals. The etiology of pain as the symptom of degenerative disease is complex and appears to be a combination of mechanical deformation and the presence of inflammatory mediators. The role of imaging is to provide accurate morphologic information and influence therapeutic decision making. A necessary component, which connects these two purposes, is accurate natural history data. Understanding the relationship of etiologic factors, the morphologic alterations, which can be characterized with imaging, and the mechanisms of pain production and their interactions in the production of symptoms will require more accurate and reproducible stratification of patient cohorts.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Médula Ósea/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Masculino , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía
15.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 189(1): 19-23, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17579145

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using disease-specific mortality as the primary outcome are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of screening tests. These trials require thousands of subjects and 8-10 years of follow-up; often the imaging technology has changed by the end of the trial. CONCLUSION: We propose the incidence of symptomatic disease as an alternative to disease-specific mortality. This endpoint is sensitive to the benefit of screening, correlates with patients' quality of life and societal costs, and can dramatically reduce the sample size and follow-up requirements of RCTs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/mortalidad , Mediciones Epidemiológicas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia
16.
Neurol Clin ; 25(2): 439-71, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17445738

RESUMEN

Spine imaging accounts for a major share of expenses related to neck and back pain. Improving image quality translates into better morphologic evaluation of the spine. Unfortunately, the morphologic abnormalities on spine imaging are common and nonspecific, obscuring the relevance to patient symptomatology. Furthermore, distinction between degenerative and age-related changes is not clear. The key is clinical correlation of imaging findings. This article presents a concise and illustrated discussion of spinal neuroimaging related to neck and back pain, with emphasis on degenerative disease.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/patología , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Dolor de Cuello/fisiopatología , Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
19.
Am Heart J ; 151(5): 945-8, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644309

RESUMEN

Modern multidetector computed tomography systems are capable of a comprehensive assessment of the cardiovascular system, including noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy. Multidetector computed tomography is expected to advance the role of noninvasive imaging for coronary artery disease, but clinical experience is still limited. Clinical guidelines are necessary to standardize scanner technology and appropriate clinical applications for coronary computed tomographic angiography. Further evaluation of this evolving technology will benefit from cooperation between different medical specialties, imaging scientists, and manufacturers of multidetector computed tomography systems, supporting multidisciplinary teams focused on the diagnosis and treatment of early and advanced stages of coronary artery disease. This cooperation will provide the necessary education, training, and guidelines for physicians and technologists assuring standard of care for their patients.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Humanos
20.
Acad Radiol ; 13(4): 480-5, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16554228

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Total body screening, despite its popularity, has not been evaluated in clinical trials. Even the appropriate target for screening has not been addressed. In this study, we determined the variables from a subject's demographic and medical and family history that are predictive of actionable findings on total body screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 982 self-referred subjects underwent total body screening with multislice computed tomography and completed a demographic and medical history questionnaire. The study sample was divided into training and testing samples. Univariate and multiple-variable statistical methods were used on the training sample to derive models that predict actionable lung findings, actionable heart findings, actionable abdomen/pelvis findings, and any actionable findings on total body screening. The training models were then applied and evaluated on the test sample. RESULTS: A subject's age at the time of screening was the single most important predictor and often the only significant predictor of actionable findings. Among subjects younger than 40 years of age, 22.5% had actionable findings; this number nearly doubled, to 43.5%, for subjects between 40 and 49, and increased to 80% for subjects 80 years and older. Overall, every increase of 10 years in age brings an increase of 1.6 in the likelihood of an actionable finding. CONCLUSIONS: Total body screening targeted at older subjects has the highest yield of actionable findings. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of total body screening for older subjects is unknown and needs further assessment.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/métodos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Ohio/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA