RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older patients cause lower back pain and abnormal posture, resulting in impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). Assessing pain using self-reported assessment tools is difficult, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. Recently, observational assessment tools have been used when self-reported ones were difficult to administer. No studies have reported the usefulness of observational assessment tools in patients with acute-phase orthopedic disorders without complication. This study aimed to examine the availability of observational tools for pain assessment in patients with lumbar vertebral fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to our hospital with acute-phase vertebral fractures were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Pain was assessed using Japanese versions of the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 observational assessment tools, and the Numerical Rating Scale, a self-reported assessment tool. To compare the pain assessment tool, we examined whether each tool correlated with ADLs and ambulatory status. ADLs were assessed using the Barthel Index. Ambulatory status was assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories and the 10-m walking test. Results: Similar to the Numerical Rating Scale scores, assessments with the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 showed significant decreases in scores over time. A significant positive correlation was observed between the self-reported and observational assessment tools. Each pain assessment tool was significantly negatively correlated with ADLs and ambulatory status. Conclusions: When self-reported assessment with the Numerical Rating Scale is difficult for patients with cognitive impairment, pain can be estimated using the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 observational assessment tools.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Dimensión del Dolor , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/complicaciones , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Actividades Cotidianas , Autoinforme , Hospitalización , JapónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the mid-term results of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) based on Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes of 93 patients (mean age 61.4 years, mean follow-up 64.2 months, 109 consecutive knees) who underwent OWHTO for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). KL grade was used to evaluate knee OA (KL-1 22 cases; KL-2, 51 cases; KL-3, 36 cases). The clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Lysholm scores. Radiographic outcomes were assessed using pre- and post-operative mechanical axis percentage, femorotibial angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint line convergence angle. Hinge fracture frequency and OA progression were also evaluated based on KL grades. RESULTS: The JOA score improved significantly from 70.3 ± 14.9 to 96.2 ± 4.4, 64.1 ± 12.5 to 95.1 ± 5.1, and 68.6 ± 11.4 to 92.1 ± 6.1 in the KL-1, KL-2, and KL-3 groups, respectively. The JOA score in the KL-3 group was significantly lower than in the other groups. The Lysholm score improved significantly from 62.6 ± 8.8 to 97.7 ± 4.7, 62.1 ± 8.1 to 96.7 ± 4.2, and 59.2 ± 9.2 to 95.8 ± 4.6 in the KL-1, KL-2, and KL-3 groups, respectively. The post-operative Lysholm scores were not significantly different among the groups. There were significant differences in radiographic parameters pre-operatively, but not post-operatively, among the groups. Although there were no significant differences in hinge fracture frequency and OA progression, the KL-3 grade predicted OA progression on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-term results of OWHTO significantly improved. However, clinical score in the KL-3 group was lower than that in the KL-1 and KL-2 groups; radiological OA progression was a risk factor in KL-3.
Asunto(s)
Articulación de la Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate preoperative sports participation and postoperative clinical outcomes including a return to sports (RTS) after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Characteristic of Hybrid CWHTO was defined as extra-articular lateral closed and medial open wedge osteotomy. METHODS: The patients who underwent hybrid CWHTO from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and divided them into sports and non-sports groups. The preoperative demographic and radiographic characteristics were compared in both groups. And the clinical outcomes including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and RTS in the sports group were also investigated. Statistical analysis was performed for comparisons among the preoperative factors between the two groups. Influence of sports impact and bone union of fibular osteotomy was also statistically investigated for RTS. RESULTS: Of the 161 knees (129 patients; 46 males, 83 females), 20 knees (16 patients; 13 males, 3 females; 12.3%) belonged to sports group. Although there were no significant differences regarding the age and radiographic parameters, there were significant differences in the body mass index and proportion of males between both groups. The JOA, VAS, Lysholm, and UCLA activity scores significantly improved after surgery. RTS was 80% at a mean duration of 7.2 ± 3.1 months. RTS in the high-impact sports group was significantly lower than that in the low-impact sports group (high-impact 60% vs. low-impact 100%, p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in RTS regarding bone union after fibular osteotomy. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes including RTS were satisfactory in patients with hybrid CWHTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.