RESUMEN
Objective: Appropriate functional vision is vital for the development of visually impaired (VI) children. However, the literature currently lacks a performance-based tool for assessing functional vision, unlike the existing self-reported tools. The objective of this study is to develop and conduct a clinimetric study on a Performance-Based Functional Vision Tool (PB-FVT) specifically designed for VI children aged 3-7 and 7-10 years old. Methods: This methodological study was conducted to assess the clinimetric properties of the PB-FVT. The assessment included face validity (evaluated through cognitive interviews and an Impact Score >1.5), content validity (with criteria including content validity ratio >0.63, item content validity index >0.78, scale content validity index or average >0.8, and Kappa value >0.7), criterion validity (assessed through a concurrent test using visual acuity scores), construct validity (utilizing the known group method), relative reliability (measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient), absolute reliability (determined by the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable changes), interpretability, responsiveness, sensitivity, and specificity (analyzed via ROC curve analysis). Results: The PB-FVT was developed with 32 items, divided into five components: activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, education, play, and social interaction. The results indicate that the scale demonstrates suitability in terms of validity, reliability, and other measurement characteristics. Conclusions: The valid and reliable PB-FVT may accurately assess the level of functional vision during early childhood, helping to prevent negative impacts on a child's overall development. By utilizing the PB-FVT, any functional vision impairments can be identified appropriately, enabling the planning and implementation of effective rehabilitation interventions.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of psychological factors (anxiety and depression) and pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the development of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) following the distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients (N=60) with a distal radius fracture was measured for signs of CRPS by Budapest criteria weekly till 8 weeks and then another follow-up one year after injury to determine the incidence and predictors of developing CRPS I in a prospective cohort study and also to discover whether there is difference between pain, depression, and anxiety level in the patients with and without CRPS I. The most of the patients were treated by Pin stabilization. The Beck depression inventoryshort form (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Numerical pain rating scale were used to determine the patients' psychological features and pain intensity at the base line and 8 weeks after the fracture. RESULTS: CRPS I developed in 15 (25%) patients after eight weeks and just last in 10 (16.67%) patients after one year. No difference was found between the two groups (CRPS and non-CRPS group) in terms of state (STAI-I) and trait (STAI-II) anxiety, and BDI score. Pain at the base line was the most important risk factor in developing CRPS (odds ratio [OR] =1.52; 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS: After fracturing the distal radius, patients who have high pain intensity have a higher risk of developing CRPS I. To following these patients closely for the development of CRPS I may be advantageous for early preventative and therapeutic interventions.