RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating software-based tumor margin assessment after percutaneous thermoablation (PTA) of liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed through Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Original studies published in English that reported on software-based assessment of ablation margins (AM) following PTA of liver tumors were selected. Studies were analyzed with respect to design, number of patients and tumors, tumor type, PTA technique, tumor size, target registration error, study outcome(s) (subtypes: feasibility, comparative, clinical impact, predictive or survival), and follow-up period. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles (one multi-center and two prospective studies) were included. The majority were feasibility (26/29, 89.7%) or predictive (23/29, 79.3%) studies. AM was a risk factor of local tumor progression (LTP) in 25 studies (25/29, 86.2%). In nine studies (9/29, 31%) visual assessment overestimated AM compared with software-aided assessment. LTP occurred at the location of the thinnest margin in nine studies (9/29, 31%). Time for registration and analysis was heterogeneously reported, ranging between 5-30 min. Mean target registration error was reported in seven studies (7/29, 24.1%) at 1.62 mm (range: 1.20-2.23 mm). Inter-operator reproducibility was high (kappa range: 0.686-1). Ascites, liver deformation and inconspicuous tumor were major factors of co-registration error. CONCLUSION: Available studies present a low level of evidence overall, since most of them are feasibility, retrospective and single-center studies.