Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 7(11): 1174-6, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19631290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data on the safety of bevacizumab-based therapies for patients carrying a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for occlusive colon cancer are lacking. We report 2 cases of colon perforation observed in our case series of patients with SEMS for occlusive colon cancer. METHODS: Patients with occlusive symptoms caused by colon cancer received a colonic stent under endoscopic and radiologic guidance. RESULTS: Over a 10-month period, 28 patients with occlusive colon cancer were treated with stent placement. The stent was placed as a bridge to surgery in 12 patients who were treated surgically within 4 to 78 days after the endoscopic procedures, without any stent-related complications. Seven patients did not receive any other antitumor treatment as a result of concomitant comorbidities. Nine patients with both primary tumor and metastatic lesions were treated with medical therapy. Over a median follow-up period of 131 days colonic perforation occurred in the 2 patients treated with a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to clarify whether SEMS placement increases the risk of perforation caused by bevacizumab-based therapies.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/complicaciones , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Stents/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Capecitabina , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 147(8): 553-62, 2007 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17938394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. A consensus on treatment duration is lacking. PURPOSE: To summarize the benefits and harms of different durations of PPI-based triple therapy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and proceedings of major meetings through May 2007. STUDY SELECTION: English-language reports of randomized, controlled trials that compared duration (7, 10, or 14 days) of triple therapy and in which adequate testing confirmed the initial H. pylori infection and its eradication. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently extracted data on study design, treatment, number of patients enrolled and number of patients with successful eradication, disease at enrollment, testing, adverse effects, year of publication, publication format, and country. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 21 included studies, 11 compared 7-day therapy with 10-day therapy, and 13 compared 7-day therapy with 14-day therapy. Meta-analysis yielded relative risks (RRs) for eradication of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.10) for 7-day compared with 10-day amoxicillin-containing triple therapy (10 studies) and 1.07 (CI, 1.02 to 1.12) for 7-day compared with 14-day therapy (11 studies). Meta-analysis of the 3 studies that compared 7-day with 14-day metronidazole-containing therapy yielded an RR of 1.08 (CI, 0.96 to 1.22). The 7-day versus 10-day comparisons yielded RRs of 1.03 (CI, 0.97 to 1.10) for peptic ulcer disease and 1.10 (CI, 1.02 to 1.20) for nonulcer dyspepsia. For the 7-day versus 14-day comparisons, the RRs were 1.04 (CI, 0.99 to 1.09) and 1.03 (CI, 0.88 to 1.20), respectively. The RRs for frequency of adverse events were 0.98 (CI, 0.85 to 1.14) and 1.08 (CI, 0.84 to 1.40) for 7-day therapy compared with 10- and 14-day therapy, respectively. Diarrhea and taste disturbance were the most frequently reported adverse events (5%). LIMITATIONS: Subgroup analyses were limited by the few studies evaluating different drug regimens and disease at enrollment. Seventeen of the included studies had poor methodological quality or inadequate reporting. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest that extending triple therapy beyond 7 days is unlikely to be a clinically useful strategy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispepsia/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/efectos adversos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA