RESUMEN

Background: In order to reduce the risk of leakage of cytotoxic agents, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are widely used in patients diagnosed with malignancy before chemotherapy. While inflammation has been demonstrated to be associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the connection between systemic immune inflammation indexes and the formation of PICC-DVT remains unclear. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the association between PICC-DVT and systemic immune inflammation indexes including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Methods: From August 2018 to October 2021, we enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with malignancy who underwent PICC implantation before chemotherapy. DVT was assessed using color Doppler ultrasonography. Results: Among the 513 patients, 57 patients (11.1%) developed PICC-DVT. The optimal cutoff values for PLR, SII and SIRI were 260.1, 1318.7, and 2.7, respectively. Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis, correlations were found between PICC-DVT and elevated PLR (p = .014), SII (p = .012), and SIRI (p = .022). Patients with malignancy having higher values of PLR, SII or SIRI tended to be more likely to develop PICC-DVT. Conclusions: The systemic immune inflammation indexes increases the risk of PICC-DVT and could be used as auxiliary predictive tests for PICC-DVT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens in the treatment of LA-NSCLC by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: An exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted to identify relevant studies from inception to October 1, 2020. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to calculate the odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as to plot the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. Cluster analyses were adopted to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens according to the similarity of 2 variables. Publication bias was detected by comparison-adjusted funnel plots. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were enrolled in this NMA, including 18 regimens: CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + carboplatin), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), CCRT (mitomycin + vindesine + cisplatin), CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine), CCRT (cisplatin), CCRT (etoposide + cisplatin + amifostine), RT, CCRT (5-FU), CCRT (paclitaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (irinotecan + carboplatin), CCRT (nedaplatin), CCRT (carboplatin + etoposide), CCRT (paclitaxel), and CCRT (carboplatin). The results indicated that the regimens with CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), and CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine) had relatively better efficacies compared with other regimens. As for toxicities of different CCRT regimens, the CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), and CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin) were relatively lower. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) and CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel) might be the best options for the treatment of LA-NSCLC, and CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) had the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a heated debate on the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance with non-metastasis 23 (NM23) expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of NM23 for NSCLC patients. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were exhaustively searched to identify relevant studies published prior to March, 2020. Odds radios (ORs) and hazard radios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the statistics of clinicopathological and prognostic assessments. Q-test and I2-statistic were utilized to assess heterogeneity across the included studies. We also performed subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to identify the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was detected by Begg and Egger tests. Sensitivity analysis was used to value the stability of our results. All the data were analyzed using statistical packages implemented in R version 4.0.5. RESULTS: Data from a total of 3170 patients from 36 studies were extracted. The meta-analysis revealed that low expression of NM23 was correlated with higher risk of NSCLC (OR = 4.35; 95% CI: 2.76-6.85; P < .01), poorer tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01-1.90; P = .04), poorer differentiation degree (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.01-1.86; P = .04), positive lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.22-2.74; P < .01), lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20-1.75; P < .01), and poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (hazard radio = 2.33; 95%CI: 1.32-4.11; P < .01). The subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses suggested that the "Publication year", "Country", "Sample size", and "Cutoff value" might be the source of heterogeneity in TNM staging, differentiation degree, and lymph node metastasis. Both Begg test and Egger test verified that there were publication bias in 5-year OS rate. Sensitivity analysis supported the credibility of the results. CONCLUSION: The reduced NM23 expression is strongly associated with higher risk of NSCLC, higher TNM staging, poorer differentiation degree, positive lymph node metastasis, lung adenocarcinoma, and poorer 5-year OS rate in NSCLC patients, which indicated that NM23 could serve as a biomarker predicating the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of NSCLC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that gene alterations play a crucial role in LUAD development, progression, and prognosis. The present study aimed to identify the hub genes associated with LUAD. In the present study, we used TCGA database to screen the hub genes. Then, we validated the results by GEO datasets. Finally, we used cBioPortal, UALCAN, qRT-PCR, HPA database, TCGA database, and Kaplan-Meier plotter database to estimate the gene mutation, gene transcription, protein expression, clinical features of hub genes in patients with LUAD. A total of 5930 DEGs were screened out in TCGA database. Enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were involved in the transcriptional misregulation in cancer, viral carcinogenesis, cAMP signaling pathway, calcium signaling pathway, and ECM-receptor interaction. The combining results of MCODE and CytoHubba showed that ADCY8, ADRB2, CALCA, GCG, GNGT1, and NPSR1 were hub genes. Then, we verified the above results by GSE118370, GSE136043, and GSE140797 datasets. Compared with normal lung tissues, the expression levels of ADCY8 and ADRB2 were lower in LUAD tissues, but the expression levels of CALCA, GCG, GNGT1, and NPSR1 were higher. In the prognosis analyses, the low expression of ADCY8 and ADRB2 and the high expression of CALCA, GCG, GNGT1, and NPSR1 were correlated with poor OS and poor PFS. The significant differences in the relationship of the expression of 6 hub genes and clinical features were observed. In conclusion, 6 hub genes will not only contribute to elucidating the pathogenesis of LUAD and may be potential therapeutic targets for LUAD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of Lobaplatin and Cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: The databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP were retrieved so as to search the studies about the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) that compared the Lobaplatin and Cisplatin for malignant pleural effusion. The main outcome indicators include objective response rate, complete response, partial response, nephrotoxicity, chest pain, gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression, fever response and hepatotoxicity. Relative risk was used as the effect size, which was expressed as 95% confidence interval. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs and 720 MPE patients were included. The results showed that the ORR (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.15-1.40, P<0.001), CR (RR=1.39, 95%CI: 1.09-1.78, P=0.007), PR (RR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.42, P=0.026) in LBP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy were significantly higher than those in DDP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy. The incidence of nephrotoxicity (RR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71, P=0.005) and gastrointestinal reactions (RR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.62, P<0.001) in the LBP group were significantly lower than those in DDP group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DDP pleural perfusion chemotherapy, the ORR, CR and PR of LBP pleural perfusion chemotherapy for MPE are significantly better than DDP, and its nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal reactions are remarkably lower than DDP.

Asunto(s)