RESUMEN
Introduction: The lipid accumulation product (LAP) and visceral adipose index (VAI) are clinical markers of visceral obesity and were proposed as simple tools to estimate cardiovascular risk and mortality. The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy of the VAI and LAP for high cardiovascular risk patients. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study of accuracy was carried out in 193 patients of both sexes. In addition to the variables VAI and LAP, presence of comorbidities, education, level of physical activity and anthropometric data were obtained. Cardiovascular risk was determined by the Framingham score. Results: No significant difference was observed in the sample in gender distribution (44.6% women; 55.4% men), 24.4% had low cardiovascular risk, 48.7% intermediate risk and 26.9% high cardiovascular risk. Linear regression analysis showed that VAI and LAP explain, respectively, only 2.4% and 5.2% of the variation in cardiovascular risk expressed by the Framingham score. The analysis of areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indicated a significant effect only of LAP to diagnose individuals with high cardiovascular risk, but with low sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: Our results indicate that VAI and LAP explain only a small percentage of the variation in the Framingham cardiovascular risk score. LAP index still deserves more attention in a cohort study, because, even with the limitations of a cross-sectional study, we observed an acceptable sensitivity for it so that the LAP can be used as a screening criterion for requesting more accurate tests. (AU)
Introducción: El producto de acumulación de lípidos (LAP) y el índice adiposo visceral (VAI) son marcadores clínicos de obesidad visceral y fueron propuestos como herramientas simples, económicas y precisas para estimar el riesgo cardiovascular y la mortalidad. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la precisión de los índices VAI y LAP para el diagnóstico de personas con alto riesgo cardiovascular. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional transversal de precisión en 193 pacientes de ambos sexos en la unidad de cardiología de un hospital universitario. Además de las variables VAI y LAP, se obtuvieron datos sociodemográficos, presencia de comorbilidades, escolaridad, nivel de actividad física y datos antropométricos para caracterizar la muestra. El riesgo cardiovascular se determinó mediante el Framingham Score. Resultados: No se observaron diferencias significativas en la muestra en la distribución por género (44,6% mujeres; 55,4% hombres), 24,4% riesgo cardiovascular bajo, 48,7% riesgo intermedio y 26,9% riesgo cardiovascular alto. El análisis de regresión lineal mostró que VAI y LAP explican, respectivamente, solo el 2,4% y el 5,2% de la variación del riesgo cardiovascular expresado por el Framingham Score. El análisis de áreas bajo la curva (AUC) para la característica operativa del receptor (ROC) indicó un efecto significativo solo de LAP para diagnosticar individuos con alto riesgo cardiovascular, pero con baja sensibilidad y especificidad. Conclusión: Nuestros resultados indican que VAI y LAP explican solo un pequeño porcentaje de la variación en la puntuación de riesgo cardiovascular de Framingham. El índice LAP aún merece más atención en un estudio de cohortes, ya que, aún con las limitaciones de un estudio transversal, observamos una sensibilidad aceptable del mismo para que el LAP pueda ser utilizado como criterio de cribado para solicitar pruebas más precisas. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adiposidad , Lípidos , Estudios Transversales , Riesgo , Obesidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The lipid accumulation product (LAP) and visceral adipose index (VAI) are clinical markers of visceral obesity and were proposed as simple tools to estimate cardiovascular risk and mortality. The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy of the VAI and LAP for high cardiovascular risk patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study of accuracy was carried out in 193 patients of both sexes. In addition to the variables VAI and LAP, presence of comorbidities, education, level of physical activity and anthropometric data were obtained. Cardiovascular risk was determined by the Framingham score. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the sample in gender distribution (44.6% women; 55.4% men), 24.4% had low cardiovascular risk, 48.7% intermediate risk and 26.9% high cardiovascular risk. Linear regression analysis showed that VAI and LAP explain, respectively, only 2.4% and 5.2% of the variation in cardiovascular risk expressed by the Framingham score. The analysis of areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indicated a significant effect only of LAP to diagnose individuals with high cardiovascular risk, but with low sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that VAI and LAP explain only a small percentage of the variation in the Framingham cardiovascular risk score. LAP index still deserves more attention in a cohort study, because, even with the limitations of a cross-sectional study, we observed an acceptable sensitivity for it so that the LAP can be used as a screening criterion for requesting more accurate tests.