RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Neonatal Life Support 2020 guidelines emphasize that meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) remains a significant risk factor for a newborn to receive advanced resuscitation, especially if additional risk factors are present at the time of birth. However, these additional perinatal risk factors are not clearly identified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of additional independent ante- and intrapartum risk factors in the era of no routine endotracheal suctioning that determine the need for resuscitation in newborns born through MSAF. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included deliveries ≥ 35 weeks' gestation associated with MSAF that occurred between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. The newborns needing resuscitation (any intervention beyond the initial steps) were compared to those not needing resuscitation. Among newborns needing resuscitation, those needing advanced resuscitation (continuous positive airway pressure/ positive pressure ventilation or beyond) were compared to those not needing advanced resuscitation. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that among various perinatal factors, primigravida, thick meconium, fetal distress, chorioamnionitis, rupture of membranes ≥ 18 hours, post-term (gestational age ≥ 42 weeks), cesarean section or shoulder dystocia independently significantly increased the odds of a meconium-stained newborn needing resuscitation. Among these factors, fetal distress, chorioamnionitis or cesarean section independently further increased the odds of needing advanced resuscitation. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification of perinatal factors associated with the need for newborn resuscitation and advanced resuscitation in the deliveries associated with MSAF may help neonatal teams and resources to be appropriately prioritized and optimally utilized.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485Video Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management. METHODS: In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). RESULTS: Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of prolonged skin-to-skin care (SSC) during blood glucose monitoring (12-24 hours) in late preterm and term infants at-risk for neonatal hypoglycemia (NH). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective pre- and postintervention study. We compared late preterm and term infants at-risk for NH born in a 1-year period before the SSC intervention, May 1, 2013, to April 30, 2014 (pre-SSC) to at-risk infants born in the year following the implementation of SSC intervention, May 1, 2014, to April 30, 2015 (post-SSC). RESULTS: The number of hypoglycemia admissions to neonatal intensive care unit among at-risk infants for NH decreased significantly from 8.1% pre-SSC period to 3.5% post-SSC period (P = 0.018). The number of infants receiving intravenous dextrose bolus in the newborn nursery also decreased significantly from 5.9% to 2.1% (P = 0.02). Number of infants discharged exclusively breastfeeding increased from 36.4% to 45.7%, although not statistically significant (P = 0.074). CONCLUSION: This SSC intervention, as implemented in our hospital, was associated with a significant decrease in newborn hypoglycemia admissions to neonatal intensive care unit. The SSC intervention was safe and feasible with no adverse events.