RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to investigate the differences between the extensile lateral (EL) and sinus tarsi (ST) approaches for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures as treated by a single surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study performed at a Level 1 trauma center. One hundred twenty-nine consecutive intra-articular calcaneus fractures from 2011 to 2018 that were surgically treated by a single surgeon. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, operative time, postoperative restoration of the critical angle of Gissane, postoperative wound complications, and need for unplanned re-operation. RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including demographics, mechanism of injury, and fracture patterns were similar between the EL and ST approach groups. There was a significant decrease in unplanned secondary procedures (P = .008), shorter time to definitive fixation (P = .00001), and shorter average operative time in the ST group (P = .00001). Postoperative measurement of the critical angle of Gissane between the two groups was significantly different, but minute with an average difference of approximately 3 degrees (P = .025). Measurements in both groups were within the expected range of normal. CONCLUSIONS: For displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures, a limited open ST approach is associated with a significant reduction in the time to definitive fixation and decreased operative time. The EL approach was associated with a small, but significant improvement in the restoration of the critical angle of Gissane compared with the ST approach. Therefore, an ST approach may allow for earlier surgical intervention and result in equivalent quality of reduction compared with an EL approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the infection and nonunion rates for open tibia fracture treatment over the past 4 decades since the introduction of the Gustilo-Anderson (GA) open fracture classification. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the PRISMA checklist for articles between 1977 and September 2018. STUDY SELECTION: One hundred sixty-one articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between 1977 and 2018, reported infection rates, reported nonunion rates, and fractures classified by the GA open fracture criteria were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were thoroughly evaluated to extract infection and nonunion data for open tibia fractures. DATA SYNTHESIS: Due to variability in the data reviewed, statistical evaluation could not be reliably done. RESULTS: 11,326 open tibia fractures were reported with 17% type I, 25.2% type II, 25.3% type IIIA, and 32.5% type IIIB/C. The average infection rate over 4 decades was 18.3%, with 24.3% superficial, 11.2% deep, and 14.7% pin tract. The infection rate by decade was 14% for 1977-1986, 16.2% for 1987-1996, 20.5% for 1997%-2006%, and 18.1% from 2007 to 2017. The overall nonunion rate was 14.1%. The nonunion rate was 13% for 1977-1986, 17% for 1987-1996, 12.8% for 1997%-2006%, and 12.3% for 2007-2017. CONCLUSIONS: This in-depth summary has demonstrated that the percentage rate for infections and nonunion has remained similar over the past 40 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Tibia , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: First described by Soule in 1910, arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint is a common operative method of treatment of hammer toe, or fixed-flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the lesser toes1. The deformity is often caused by imbalance in intrinsic and extrinsic muscle function across the interphalangeal joint and metatarsophalangeal joint2,3, which can be effectively addressed through proximal interphalangeal joint straightening and arthrodesis in conjunction with soft-tissue balancing of the metatarsophalangeal joint. Description: Following longitudinal skin incision over the joint, a transverse extensor tenotomy and capsulotomy reveal the proximal interphalangeal joint and provide appropriate exposure of the head of the proximal phalanx. With the soft tissues protected, the proximal and middle phalanges undergo resection of the articular surfaces to allow osseous apposition. This step can be performed with a rongeur sagittal saw or with osteotomes4,5. The head of the proximal phalanx is resected proximal to the head-neck junction, and the proximal portion of the middle phalanx is removed to expose the subchondral bone. Often, there is a dorsal contracture of the metatarsophalangeal joint that is elevating the toe, which is addressed with use of a longitudinal incision over the metatarsophalangeal joint, a Z-lengthening of the long extensor tendon to the toe, and a subsequent capsulectomy. If there is an angular component to the deformity, the collateral ligaments are released from the metatarsal neck, and the toe can be balanced. If there is residual subluxation of the joint that is incompletely corrected by soft-tissue procedures, a metatarsal osteotomy should be considered. Fixation is then performed with use of a smooth Kirschner wire. The wire is inserted from the middle phalanx out the tip of the toe and subsequently inserted retrograde across the proximal interphalangeal joint, often into the metatarsal head and neck, holding the metatarsophalangeal joint in appropriate position. This step can also be completed with use of novel methods including screws, bioabsorbable pins, or intramedullary implants6-8. Alternatives: Nonoperative treatments for hammer toe deformity are generally pursued prior to surgery and include shoe modifications such as a wide toe-box, soft uppers, and padding of osseous prominences3,9,10. Alternative surgical treatments include proximal interphalangeal arthroplasty, soft-tissue capsulotomy, extensor tendon lengthening, and amputation11. Rationale: Although nonoperative treatment can alleviate symptoms temporarily, surgical treatment is often necessary for definitive treatment of hammer toe. Soft-tissue procedures such as tendon lengthening can provide a stabilizing benefit, but the degenerative bone changes associated with hammer toe are better addressed with use of resection of the proximal interphalangeal joint3. Arthroplasty allows for some retained motion; however, this motion may lead to deformity and pain over time2. Arthrodesis provides less painful and more reliable fixation as well as equal outcomes compared with other operative techniques. Patient satisfaction rates after this procedure are high, with pain relief in up to 92% of patients and rare complications7-12. Expected Outcomes: Outcomes of this procedure are favorable, with rates of osseous fusion ranging from 83% to 98%2,4,11,13. Patient satisfaction rates range from 83% to 100%4,11. Historically, patients have expressed dissatisfaction with pain and the appearance of exposed hardware, but novel internal fixative devices provide a more natural appearance to the toe without the need for secondary surgical procedures for pin removal8,14. Patients are often able to return to regular activity at 6 weeks postoperatively; however, there may be persistent pain or swelling in the toe. Wide shoes and activity modifications are frequently continued for several more weeks postoperatively, and some patients may benefit from formal physical therapy and at-home rehabilitation. Important Tips: Avoid vascular compromise by ensuring adequate resection of bone at the proximal interphalangeal joint.A longitudinal incision across the joint provides greater exposure but can lead to scar contracture that elevates the toe. One alternative is the use of an elliptically shaped incision over the proximal interphalangeal joint, which can improve cosmesis but does restrict exposure.Excessive osseous resection can lead to a cosmetically undesirable short toe.If using an implant for the arthrodesis, ensure the implant is not too big for the toe. Most implants are too big for fifth-toe arthrodesis.In toes with severe deformity, fixation with a Kirschner wire is often preferred because excessive stretching of the neurovascular bundle can lead to toe compromise and if Kirschner wire is used the pin can easily be removed at bedside.For flexible deformities, a nonoperative approach is recommended, such as stretching exercises, shoe-wear modifications, and metatarsal pads. A tenotomy of the flexor digitorum brevis is a soft-tissue procedure that can be considered if nonoperative treatment is insufficient to correct the deformity. If flexor digitorum brevis tenotomy does not adequately treat proximal interphalangeal joint deformity, a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis should be the next step. Acronyms and Abbreviations: MTP = metatarsophalangealPIP = proximal interphalangeal.