RESUMEN
The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in Fig. 2c, d and Funding section.
RESUMEN
Prolonged or repeated exposure to ketamine, a common anesthetic in pediatrics, has been shown to induce neurotoxicity and long-term neurocognitive deficits in the developing brain. Therefore, identification of potential therapeutic targets for preventing or alleviating such neurodegeneration and neuroapoptosis induced by ketamine is urgently needed. Remote ischemic preconditioning of the limb provides neuroprotection in different models of cerebral injury. Thus, the present study aimed to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning could have a neuroprotective effect against neurotoxicity induced by ketamine. In our study, 96 newborn rats were assigned to one of four groups, including control, remote ischemic preconditioning, ketamine, and remote ischemic preconditioning plus ketamine. Ketamine was administered intraperitoneally in six doses of 20 mg/kg at 2-h intervals. Limb remote ischemic preconditioning comprised four ischemia (5 min)/reperfusion (5 min) cycles in the right hind limb using an elastic rubber band tourniquet. Histopathological characteristics of cerebral damage were assessed by H&E staining and transmission electron microscopy. TUNEL assay, immunohistochemical staining and immunoblot were employed to evaluate neural cell apoptosis. Learning and memory were evaluated using the Morris water maze. The results showed increased cleaved caspase-3 protein levels in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampal CA1 region, severe cell damage and DNA breakage, and decreased spatial learning and memory abilities in the ketamine group in comparison with controls. Notably, these changes were significantly reduced by remote ischemic preconditioning. These findings suggest that remote ischemic preconditioning ameliorates neuroapoptosis and neurocognitive impairment after repeated ketamine exposure in newborn rats.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Disociativos/efectos adversos , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/prevención & control , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Animales , Apoptosis , Encéfalo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Aprendizaje por Laberinto , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-DawleyRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) at different time-points on postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparotomy were randomly assigned to intravenous anesthesia, EA A, EA B, and EA C groups (nï¼20 cases in each group). All the patients in the four groups received intravenous anesthesia with midazolam, sufentanil, cisatracurium besylate and Propofol, postoperative gastrointestinal decompression and drug analgesia. EA (2ï¼3 mA, 2 Hz) was applied to Zhongwan (CV 12) and Tianshu (ST 25), Neiguan (PC 6), Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Xiajuxu (ST 39) on the right side for 30 min, once (one day before surgery) in the EA A group, twice (one day and 30 min before surgery) in the EA B group, and 3 times (one day, 30 min before and one day after surgery) in the EA C group. The acupoints used after surgery were PC 6, ST 36, ST 37 and ST 39. The time of postoperative ventilation, defecation, food-intake and water drinking, stomach tube removal and abdominal drainage tube removal, the volumes of stomach tube drainage and abdominal drainage, and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS: The first ventilation time, after surgery in the EA C group was significantly earlier than those in the intravenous anesthesia, EA A and EA B groups (P<0.05); and the water intake and abdomicnal drainage tube removal time after surgery in the EA C group were significantly earlier than those in the intravenous anesthesia group (P<0.05). No significant differences were found among the 4 groups in the time of defecation, food intake, stomach tube removal, stomach tube drainage and abdominal drainage volumes, and numbers of patients with nausea, vomiting, fever and other adverse reactions (P>0.05)ï¼. CONCLUSION: EA treatment combined with intravenous anesthesia conducted before and after surgery is effective in promoting the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal cancer laparotomy, and is obviously better than simple pre-operative EA.