RESUMEN
The development of a questionnaire that measures user satisfaction in the area of Rehabilitation is essential in order to measure the success achieved and to be able to introduce actions to improve health care. OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a questionnaire to assess the satisfaction of the care received in a Rehabilitation Department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Rehabilitation Department of the Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA). A questionnaire was designed and prepared by experts using the Delphi technique. For the face validity, a pilot study was used using focal groups (doctors, nursing staff, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and patients). An evaluation was made of the reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency (Cronbach alpha). In a second stage, it was completed by 207 patients. The questionnaire consisted of 24 items that evaluated 4 dimensions: care/relationship, information/treatment, infrastructure, and general evaluation. RESULTS: A Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation of greater than 0.8 was obtained in the first stage using a pilot test on 40 patients with a mean age of 58 years (SD ±16). The scale showed a good internal consistency in its final version (Cronbach alpha of 0.82) and an adequate stability (intraclass correlation of 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in the study showed that the designed questionnaire had a reliability of validity. And for this reason, it would be a valid and reliable tool for measuring the satisfaction of the care received by patients in Rehabilitation Departments.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Rehabilitación , Autoinforme , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR BSI) reduction programme and healthcare workers' compliance with recommendations. A 3-year surveillance programme of CR BSIs in all hospital settings was implemented. As part of the programme, there was a direct observation of insertion and maintenance of central venous catheters (CVCs) to determine performance. A total of 38 education courses were held over the study period and feedback reports with the results of surveillance and recommendations were delivered to healthcare workers every 6 months. A total of 6722 short-term CVCs were inserted in 4982 patients for 58 763 catheter-days. Improvements of compliance with hand hygiene was verified at the insertion (87·1-100%, P < 0·001) and maintenance (51·1-72·1%, P = 0·029) of CVCs; and the use of chlorhexidine for skin disinfection was implemented at insertion (35·7-65·4%, P < 0·001) and maintenance (33·3-45·9%, P < 0·197) of CVCs. There were 266 CR BSI incidents recorded with an annual incidence density of 5·75/1000 catheter-days in the first year, 4·38 in the second year [rate ratio (RR) 0·76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·57-1·01] and 3·46 in the third year (RR 0·60, 95% CI 0·44-0·81). The education programme clearly improved compliance with recommendations for CVC handling, and was effective in reducing the burden of CR BSIs.