RESUMEN
Prebiotics can alter the gastrointestinal environment, favoring the growth of health-promoting bacteria. Although yacon is a functional food, with prebiotic properties (fructooligosaccharides), its effects on the intestinal microbiota have not been investigated yet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of yacon flour consumption and energy-restricted diet in the intestinal microbiota in adults with excess body weight. Twenty-one adults with excess body weight were included in this randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week clinical trial. Subjects daily consumed at breakfast a drink containing 25 g of yacon flour (n = 11) or not containing yacon (n = 10) and received the prescription of energy-restricted diets. Fecal samples were collected on the first and on last day of the study. 16S rRNA sequencing was assessed to evaluate the effect of yacon fermentation on intestinal microbiota bacterial composition. There was an increase in the genera Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Subdoligranulum, and Streptococcus after the consumption of yacon and energy-restricted diet. In the yacon group, we also observed a positive correlation between the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids versus the genera Coprococcus and Howardella, besides a negative correlation between the concentrations of advanced glycation end products and early glycation products versus the genera Ruminococcus and Prevotella, respectively. Consumption of yacon flour and energy-restricted diet selectively changed the intestinal microbiota composition in adults with excess body weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Register number: RBR-6YH6BQ. Registered 23 January, 2018.
Asunto(s)
Harina , Prebióticos , Humanos , Adulto , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Obesidad , Heces , DietaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hand Grip Strength (HGS) has been proposed as an indicator of nutritional status, being an easy and non-invasive method and presenting high reliability among evaluators. However, there are no cut-off points. To compare HGS with objective methods of nutritional assessment and to propose a cut-off point for its use as a predictor of malnutrition in cancer patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study with 76 patients (52.6% females, 56.8 ± 16.6 years old) admitted with a diagnosis of cancer in hospitals of Belo Horizonte (MG, Brazil). We evaluated the HGS of the dominant hand, Body Mass Index (BMI), calf circumference (CC), and arm circumference (AC), using the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, being the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) the reference method. Statistical tests were performed according to the distribution of the variables, verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS: The HGS was higher in men (p = 0.001) and adults (p = 0.002). The HGS presented a better performance in the prediction of malnutrition (AUC = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.656-0.936) compared to the anthropometric indicators, with a cut-off point of 32.5 kg (sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 61.5%). The prevalence of malnutrition was 82.9% and 81.6% for PG-SGA and proposed cut-off point for HGS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The HGS was more sensitive to identify individuals at risk of malnutrition compared to other recognized indicators of nutritional status, indicating its application in a hospital setting with cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Desnutrición , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.