RESUMEN

Background. Mobile ear-EEG provides the opportunity to record EEG unobtrusively in everyday life. However, in real-life, the EEG data quickly becomes difficult to interpret, as the neural signal is contaminated by other, non-neural signal contributions. Due to the small number of electrodes in ear-EEG devices, the interpretation of the EEG becomes even more difficult. For meaningful and reliable ear-EEG, it is crucial that the brain signals we wish to record in real life are well-understood and that we make optimal use of the available electrodes. Their placement should be guided by prior knowledge about the characteristics of the signal of interest.Objective.We want to understand the signal we record with ear-EEG and make recommendations on how to optimally place a limited number of electrodes.Approach.We built a high-density ear-EEG with 31 channels spaced densely around one ear. We used it to record four auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): the mismatch negativity, the P300, the N100 and the N400. With this data, we gain an understanding of how different stages of auditory processing are reflected in ear-EEG. We investigate the electrode configurations that carry the most information and use a mass univariate ERP analysis to identify the optimal channel configuration. We additionally use a multivariate approach to investigate the added value of multi-channel recordings.Main results.We find significant condition differences for all ERPs. The different ERPs vary considerably in their spatial extent and different electrode positions are necessary to optimally capture each component. In the multivariate analysis, we find that the investigation of the ERPs benefits strongly from multi-channel ear-EEG.Significance.Our work emphasizes the importance of a strong theoretical and practical background when building and using ear-EEG. We provide recommendations on finding the optimal electrode positions. These results will guide future research employing ear-EEG in real-life scenarios.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Against the background of demographic change and the need for enhancement techniques for an aging society, we set out to repeat a study that utilized 40-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to counteract the slowdown of reaction times in a vigilance experiment but with participants aged 65 years and older. On an oscillatory level, vigilance decrement is linked to rising occipital alpha power, which has been shown to be downregulated using gamma-tACS. Method: We applied tACS on the visual cortex and compared reaction times, error rates, and alpha power of a group stimulated with 40 Hz to a sham and a 5-Hz-stimulated control group. All groups executed two 30-min-long blocks of a visual task and were stimulated according to group in the second block. We hypothesized that the expected increase in reaction times and alpha power would be reduced in the 40-Hz group compared to the control groups in the second block (INTERVENTION). Results: Statistical analysis with linear mixed models showed that reaction times increased significantly over time in the first block (BASELINE) with approximately 3 ms/min for the SHAM and 2 ms/min for the 5-Hz and 40-Hz groups, with no difference between the groups. The increase was less pronounced in the INTERVENTION block (1 ms/min for SHAM and 5-Hz groups, 3 ms/min for the 40-Hz group). Differences among groups in the INTERVENTION block were not significant if the 5-Hz or the 40-Hz group was used as the base group for the linear mixed model. Statistical analysis with a generalized linear mixed model showed that alpha power was significantly higher after the experiment (1.37 µV2) compared to before (1 µV2). No influence of stimulation (40 Hz, 5 Hz, or sham) could be detected. Discussion: Although the literature has shown that tACS offers potential for older adults, our results indicate that findings from general studies cannot simply be transferred to an old-aged group. We suggest adjusting stimulation parameters to the neurophysiological features expected in this group. Next to heterogeneity and cognitive fitness, the influence of motivation and medication should be considered.

RESUMEN

Objective. Ear-EEG (electroencephalography) allows to record brain activity using only a few electrodes located close to the ear. Ear-EEG is comfortable and easy to apply, facilitating beyond-the-lab EEG recordings in everyday life. With the unobtrusive setup, a person wearing it can blend in, allowing unhindered EEG recordings in social situations. However, compared to classical cap-EEG, only a small part of the head is covered with electrodes. Most scalp positions that are known from established EEG research are not covered by ear-EEG electrodes, making the comparison between the two approaches difficult and might hinder the transition from cap-based lab studies to ear-based beyond-the-lab studies.Approach. We here provide a reference data-set comparing ear-EEG and cap-EEG directly for four different auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): N100, MMN, P300 and N400. We show how the ERPs are reflected when using only electrodes around the ears.Main results. We find that significant condition differences for all ERP-components could be recorded using only ear-electrodes. The effect sizes were moderate to high on the single subject level. Morphology and temporal evolution of signals recorded from around-the-ear resemble highly those from standard scalp-EEG positions. We found a reduction in effect size (signal loss) for the ear-EEG electrodes compared to cap-EEG of 21%-44%. The amount of signal loss depended on the ERP-component; we observed the lowest percentage signal loss for the N400 and the highest percentage signal loss for the N100. Our analysis further shows that no single channel position around the ear is optimal for recording all ERP-components or all participants, speaking in favor of multi-channel ear-EEG solutions.Significance. Our study provides reference results for future studies employing ear-EEG.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Ear-EEG allows to record brain activity in every-day life, for example to study natural behaviour or unhindered social interactions. Compared to conventional scalp-EEG, ear-EEG uses fewer electrodes and covers only a small part of the head. Consequently, ear-EEG will be less sensitive to some cortical sources. Here, we perform realistic electromagnetic simulations to compare cEEGrid ear-EEG with 128-channel cap-EEG. We compute the sensitivity of ear-EEG for different cortical sources, and quantify the expected signal loss of ear-EEG relative to cap-EEG. Our results show that ear-EEG is most sensitive to sources in the temporal cortex. Furthermore, we show how ear-EEG benefits from a multi-channel configuration (i.e. cEEGrid). The pipelines presented here can be adapted to any arrangement of electrodes and can therefore provide an estimate of sensitivity to cortical regions, thereby increasing the chance of successful experiments using ear-EEG.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) of the brain can have variable effects, plausibly driven by individual differences in neuroanatomy and resulting differences of the electric fields inside the brain. Here, we integrated individual simulations of electric fields during tES with source localization to predict variability of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) aftereffects on α-oscillations. In two experiments, participants received 20-min of either α-tACS (1 mA) or sham stimulation. Magnetoencephalogram (MEG) was recorded for 10-min before and after stimulation. tACS caused a larger power increase in the α-band compared to sham. The variability of this effect was significantly predicted by measures derived from individual electric field modeling. Our results directly link electric field variability to variability of tACS outcomes, underline the importance of individualizing stimulation protocols, and provide a novel approach to analyze tACS effects in terms of dose-response relationships.

Asunto(s)