RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To examine over-the-counter pain medication use in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of a weighted surveillance survey using the 2019 Iowa Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data. A sample of 759 pregnant women of childbearing age from Iowa was weighted to represent 31,728 Iowa mothers. The weighted sample represents 80% non-Hispanic White mothers, with smaller percentages of Hispanic (10%) mothers and non-Hispanic Black (7%) mothers, consistent with the population of Iowa. Approximately two-thirds of women had commercial insurance (66%), some college or greater education (62%), and were from urban areas (59%). ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were calculated. Variables include over-the-counter pain reliever usage among all respondents and by race/ethnicity and education level. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of women reported taking over-the-counter pain relievers during pregnancy. Of these, 71% reported taking acetaminophen, 11% reported taking ibuprofen, 8% aspirin, and 3% naproxen. Nearly 80% of non-Hispanic White mothers reported taking an over-the-counter pain reliever during pregnancy compared to just 64% of mothers reported as Hispanic. Iowa mothers with a college education or greater were more likely to report over-the-counter pain reliever use during pregnancy (84%) than their counterparts with a high school education or less (64%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Some medications may cause harm to the fetus if taken at specific time during pregnancy. Reinforcement of current pain medication education, including risks to fetus throughout pregnancy may be needed.
Asunto(s)
Madres , Dolor , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Etnicidad , Ibuprofeno , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos , AcetaminofénRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The negative impact of stress on the mental health of perinatal women is well-established. Prior research using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) confirms three distinct stress domains: financial, relationship, and trauma. In 2013, an item assessing perceived racial discrimination was added to the Iowa PRAMS. Using the first phase of available data, we examine whether perceived racial discrimination represents an independent stress domain and assess its association with postpartum depressed mood. METHODS: A principal component analysis of the Iowa PRAMS data (2013-2015: N = 2,805) evaluated stress and perceived racial discrimination. Logistic regression examined the effect of racial discrimination on postpartum depressed mood. RESULTS: In Iowa, 4.4% of respondents perceived racial discrimination, with higher rates among non-Hispanic Black women and Hispanic women. The principal component analysis identified five stress domains: financial, relational, traumatic, emotional, and displacement. Perceived racial discrimination did not load onto any of these domains, suggesting that it represents an independent stress component. Logistic regression indicated that those who experienced perceived racial discrimination were twice as likely to have experienced depressed mood. CONCLUSIONS: Racism, in the form of perceived racial discrimination among pregnant women, is a unique domain of stress that is significantly associated with an increased risk for depressed postpartum mood. Decreasing discrimination's effects on perinatal mental health could begin with ensuring respectful and compassionate health care during pregnancy and the postpartum period.