Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Fam Physician ; 73(4): 659-64, 2006 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16506709

RESUMEN

Preterm premature rupture of membranes is the rupture of membranes during pregnancy before 37 weeks' gestation. It occurs in 3 percent of pregnancies and is the cause of approximately one third of preterm deliveries. It can lead to significant perinatal morbidity, including respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, umbilical cord prolapse, placental abruption, and fetal death. Appropriate evaluation and management are important for improving neonatal outcomes. Speculum examination to determine cervical dilation is preferred because digital examination is associated with a decreased latent period and with the potential for adverse sequelae. Treatment varies depending on gestational age and includes consideration of delivery when rupture of membranes occurs at or after 34 weeks' gestation. Corticosteroids can reduce many neonatal complications, particularly intraventricular hemorrhage and respiratory distress syndrome, and antibiotics are effective for increasing the latency period.


Asunto(s)
Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/diagnóstico , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/terapia , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/fisiopatología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Examen Físico , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
2.
J Reprod Med ; 50(7): 547-9, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16130855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) perforation of the bowel is uncommon. Although IUD perforation may be asymptomatic, the most common complaint is unexplained abdominal pain. CASE: A case of IUD perforation of the large bowel was diagnosed 7 years after insertion. The patient presented with unexplained lower abdominal pain diagnosed initially as pelvic inflammatory disease. Laparoscopy revealed that the IUD was embedded deeply in the rectum. Bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics followed by colonoscopy using a grasping snare resulted in successful IUD removal. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with IUDs embedded in the large bowel may benefit from attempted removal using colonoscopy rather than laparotomy. Bowel preparation, intravenous antibiotics and pos-textraction evaluation to rule out perforation may be prudent.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/métodos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/complicaciones , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/cirugía , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA