RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Ex situ hepatic transection (ESHT) has allowed transplantation of younger and smaller patients than whole liver grafts. Liver transection is a technical challenge due to the prolonged back table time, possible graft lesions, and increased surgical bleeding from the cut surface. We compare the outcomes of whole versus transected liver grafts in pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 41 pediatric patients who underwent 42 consecutive liver transplants (1 retransplant) from cadaveric donors. The study included all patients <18 years old who were transplanted at our institution from December 2001 to September 2009. Patients were distributed into 2 groups: whole organ (WO; n = 20) and transected liver grafts (TLG; n = 21). The ESHT grafts included 17 splits and 5 reduced size livers. We evaluated the age, weight, blood component transfusions, 1-year survival, laboratory tests at 2nd and 7th days postoperatively, surgical complications, reoperations, rejection episodes, cold ischemia time, biliary reconstruction type, and donor laboratory tests. Data were analyzed using Fisher and Student's t-tests. RESULTS: The mean age was 115 months (range, 7 months to 17.6 years) in the WO group and 43.3 months (range, 5 months to 16.25 years) in the TLG group (P = .0003). Mean weight was 19.8 kg (range, 5.8-67) and 9.7 Kg (range, 5.2-57) in the WO and TLG groups, respectively (P = .0079). Red blood cell transfusion was higher in the TLG group (P = .0479). Laboratory tests showed no difference between the 2 groups considering hepatic lesions or function markers. One-year patient survivals were 90% and 85.8% among the WO and LTG, respectively (P = .588). The overall 1-year survival rate was 88.8%. CONCLUSION: ESHT allowed smaller and younger children to be transplanted. There was an increased necessity of red blood cell transfusions after hepatic transection. There was no impact on liver function or 1-year patient or graft survival after ESHT.