RESUMEN
Compression on the lumbar spine is 1000 N for standing and walking and is higher during lifting. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles under a vertical load of 80-100 N. Conversely, the whole lumbar spine can support physiologic compressive loads without large displacements when the load is applied along a follower path that approximates the tangent to the curve of the lumbar spine. This study utilized a two-dimensional beam-column model of the lumbar spine in the frontal plane under gravitational and active muscle loads to address the following question: Can trunk muscle activation cause the path of the internal force resultant to approximate the tangent to the spinal curve and allow the lumbar spine to support compressive loads of physiologic magnitudes? The study identified muscle activation patterns that maintained the lumbar spine model under compressive follower load, resulting in the minimization of internal shear forces and bending moments simultaneously at all lumbar levels. The internal force resultant was compressive, and the lumbar spine model, loaded in compression along the follower load path, supported compressive loads of physiologic magnitudes with minimal change in curvature in the frontal plane. Trunk muscles may coactivate to generate a follower load path and allow the ligamentous lumbar spine to support physiologic compressive loads.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Modelos Biológicos , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Humanos , Soporte de PesoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: An experimental approach was used to test human cadaveric cervical spine specimens. OBJECTIVE: To assess the response of the cervical spine to a compressive follower load applied along a path that approximates the tangent to the curve of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The compressive load on the human cervical spine is estimated to range from 120 to 1200 N during activities of daily living. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles at approximately 10 N. Differences between the estimated in vivo loads and the ex vivo load-carrying capacity have not been satisfactorily explained. METHODS: A new experimental technique was developed for applying a compressive follower load of physiologic magnitudes up to 250 N. The experimental technique applied loads that minimized the internal shear forces and bending moments, loading the specimen in nearly pure compression. RESULTS: A compressive vertical load applied in the neutral and forward-flexed postures caused large changes in cervical lordosis at small load magnitudes. The specimen collapsed in extension or flexion at a load of less than 40 N. In sharp contrast, the cervical spine supported a load of up to 250 N without damage or instability in both the sagittal and frontal planes when the load path was tangential to the spinal curve. The cervical spine was significantly less flexible under a compressive follower load compared with the hypermobility demonstrated under a compressive vertical load (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The load-carrying capacity of the ligamentous cervical spine sharply increased under a compressive follower load. This experiment explains how a whole cervical spine can be lordotic and yet withstand the large compressive loads estimated in vivo without damage or instability.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/fisiología , Fuerza Compresiva/fisiología , Soporte de Peso/fisiología , Cadáver , Humanos , Articulaciones/fisiología , Modelos Lineales , Lordosis/fisiopatología , Movimiento/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Postura/fisiologíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: An experimental approach was used to test human cadaveric spine specimens. OBJECTIVE: To assess the response of the whole lumbar spine to a compressive follower load whose path approximates the tangent to the curve of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compression on the lumbar spine is 1000 N for standing and walking and is higher during lifting. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles at 80-100 N. Differences between maximum ex vivo and in vivo loads have not been satisfactorily explained. METHODS: A new experimental technique was developed for applying a compressive follower load of physiologic magnitudes up to 1200 N. The experimental technique applied loads that minimized the internal shear forces and bending moments, made the resultant internal force compressive, and caused the load path to approximate the tangent to the curve of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: A compressive vertical load applied in the neutral lordotic and forward-flexed postures caused large changes in lumbar lordosis at small load magnitudes. The specimen approached its extension or flexion limits at a vertical load of 100 N. In sharp contrast, the lumbar spine supported a load of up to 1200 N without damage or instability when the load path was tangent to the spinal curve. CONCLUSIONS: Until this study, an experimental technique for applying compressive loads of in vivo magnitudes to the whole lumbar spine was unavailable. The load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine sharply increased under a compressive follower load, as long as the load path remained within a small range around the centers of rotation of the lumbar segments. The follower load path provides an explanation of how the whole lumbar spine can be lordotic and yet resist large compressive loads. This study may have implications for determining the role of trunk muscles in stabilizing the lumbar spine.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Adulto , Cadáver , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sacro/fisiología , Estrés Mecánico , Soporte de PesoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Frontal plane geometry of postoperative curves was analyzed using a geometric model to investigate the relationship between coronal decompensation and postoperative apical shifts from the center sacral line for various thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a balanced spinal configuration is possible when the postoperative lumbar curve is larger than the thoracic curve, and to determine the limits on the postoperative magnitude of the lumbar curve relative to the thoracic curve beyond which a spinal configuration with acceptable balance cannot be achieved. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have suggested that overcorrection of the primary thoracic curve may be the principal cause of coronal decompensation after selective thoracic correction and fusion in King Type II curves. Also, other causative factors, such as inappropriate selection of fusion levels and hook patterns, have been implicated as possible reasons for decompensation after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Postoperative thoracic curves of 20 degrees, 25 degrees, and 30 degrees were simulated on a model spine. For each thoracic Cobb angle, three left lumbar curves were simulated with the lumbar curve larger than thoracic by 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 15 degrees. For each combination of thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, spinal configurations corresponding to different lateral shifts of the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae from the center sacral line were obtained. RESULTS: For a given combination of postoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, there is an optimal range of postoperative lateral distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices (relative apical distance) that will maintain acceptable balance (decompensation < or = 10 mm). Smaller values of the relative apical distance will decompensate the spine. For a constant postoperative thoracic Cobb angle, the postoperative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices needed to maintain a balanced spine increases with increasing postoperative lumbar Cobb angle. Similarly, for a constant difference between the postoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, the postoperative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices needed to maintain a balance spine increases with increasing postoperative thoracic Cobb angle. For postoperative thoracic curves of 20 degrees-30 degrees, acceptable balance can be achieved when the magnitude of the postoperative lumbar curve is up to twice the thoracic curve as long as adequate postoperative relative apical distance can be maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Decompensation does not appear to be caused by the relative magnitudes of the postoperative thoracic and lumbar curves, but is a result of inadequate relative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae in the postoperative geometry.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Escoliosis/fisiopatología , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiología , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugíaRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) Can the standard linear solid model for viscoelastic material simulate the influence of disc level and degeneration on the ability of a disc to withstand prolonged loading and low-frequency vibration? (2) How well does the SLS model explain the relationship between the ability of a disc to resist prolonged loading and its ability to resist dynamic loads and dissipate energy when subjected to low-frequency vibration? Responses of human thoracic and lumbar discs were measured in axial compression under a constant load, and for cyclic deformations at three frequencies. Parameters of the SLS model for each disc were determined by a least-squares fit to the experimental creep response. The model was subsequently used to predict the disc's response to cyclic deformations. The SLS model was able to qualitatively simulate the effects of disc level and degeneration on the ability of an intervertebral disc to resist both prolonged loading and low-frequency vibration. However, the model underestimated the stress relaxation, dynamic modulus and hysteresis of thoracic and lumbar discs subjected to low-frequency vibration. The SLS model was unable to explain the relationship between the ability of a disc to resist prolonged loading and its ability to resist dynamic loads and dissipate energy when subjected to low-frequency vibration. Although in the lumbar discs the steady-state predictions of the SLS model were significantly correlated to the experimental response, the strength of model predictions decreased with increasing frequency, particularly for hysteresis.
Asunto(s)
Disco Intervertebral/fisiología , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Modelos Estructurales , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Elasticidad , Predicción , Humanos , Disco Intervertebral/anatomía & histología , Vértebras Lumbares/anatomía & histología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Estrés Mecánico , Vértebras Torácicas/anatomía & histología , Vibración , ViscosidadRESUMEN
The mechanical strength of the human radius and ulna depends on their geometrical and material properties. This study quantifies the cortical bone cross-sectional properties of the adult radius and ulna (cross-sectional area, thickness, centroids, area moments of inertia and section moduli) using computerized tomographic (CT) scanning coupled with image processing along the lengths of eight human cadaveric forearms. Bone mineral mass and apparent ash density were also quantified at serial locations. Sites of significant variation of selected geometric and mineral properties along the length of each forearm bone were determined. Our results show that interpolation of CT measurements made at 10 and 30% of the radial length in the radius and 30 and 90% of the radial length in the ulna can provide approximate geometric values over the 10-90% region. This information can be used to develop a protocol using the fewest sites to clinically assess changes in forearm bone geometry. Regression analyses did not show significant linear relationships between geometric properties and apparent cortical ash density. Thus, CT derived geometric properties are not helpful in estimating the extent of changes in bone density. Area moment of inertia results suggest that the junction of the middle and distal third of the radius, and the ulnar shaft region may have increased vulnerability to fractures. The former is likely due to the change in moment of inertia values, whereas the latter is due to the relatively small magnitude of cross-sectional moments along the ulnar shaft as compared to the proximal or distal ends. This is consistent with fracture patterns observed clinically when a single forearm bone is fractured: Galeazzi fracture of the radius and nightstick fracture of the ulna.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Radio (Anatomía)/anatomía & histología , Cúbito/anatomía & histología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Radio (Anatomía)/fisiología , Valores de Referencia , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Cúbito/diagnóstico por imagen , Cúbito/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Spinal orthoses have been traditionally used in the management of thoracolumbar injuries treated with or without surgical stabilization. However, the orthotic treatment modality in the management of spinal fractures remains subjective since few objective data are available on the effectiveness of orthoses in stabilizing injured segments. This study used a finite element model of the spine to evaluate the effectiveness of a hyperextension orthosis in controlling the progression of deformities at the injury site under gravitational and flexion loads. Two types of injuries were simulated: a single-level injury at T12-L1 and a two-level injury at T11-T12-L1 segments. An injury of increasing severity was simulated by progressively reducing the bending stiffness of the affected segments relative to the normal values in flexion-extension mode. The interaction of a three-point hyperextension orthosis with the spine was simulated using experimentally measured stiffness properties of the orthosis. The authors' results suggest that in single-level injuries that cause up to 50% loss of segmental stiffness, the orthosis can restore normal resistance to deformity at the injured segments, under gravitational as well as large flexion loads. In loss of stiffness between 50% and 85% of normal, such as severe two-column disruptions, the orthosis can restore resistance to deformity under restricted patient activity level in the brace (low-flexion moment). Beyond 85% loss of segmental stiffness, such as three-column injuries, the orthosis alone appears to be ineffective in preventing progression of deformity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Diseño de Equipo , HumanosRESUMEN
Stability of three types of double scoliotic curves of 10-40 degrees was analyzed using a biomechanical model: double primary (Type I), primary thoracic with compensatory lumbar (Type II), and primary lumbar with compensatory thoracic (Type III). The load-carrying capacity of each curve was analyzed as a function of magnitude of the curve, its location and flexibility. Curve magnitude was found to be the most influential parameter governing the stability of a scoliotic curve up to 30 degrees. Results suggest that in evaluating curves of comparable magnitudes, Type I and II curves are more likely to progress and, therefore, should be braced at an earlier stage than Type III curves.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Escoliosis/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Pronóstico , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis has been developed using the classical theory of curved beam-columns. The interaction of the spinal musculature and other supporting structures is incorporated in the model using an equivalent flexural rigidity. The stability of a given scoliotic curve relative to a normal spine is described in terms of the so-called critical load ratio (Pc/Pe). This dimensionless quantity appears in the exact solution of the governing differential equation and boundary conditions. It is defined as the ratio of the load bearing capacity of a scoliotic spine (Pc) to that of a normal spine where the load bearing capacity of a normal spine is defined as Euler's buckling load (Pe). The computation of Pc/Pe is based upon a maximum allowable moment criterion. This model is used to study the effect of the degree of initial curvature and curve pattern in the frontal plane on the stability of untreated idiopathic scoliosis. Although restricted to two-dimensions, the model appears to demonstrate the synergistic effects of end support, transverse loading, and curve correction on improvement in relative stability of an orthotically supported scoliotic curve. The results of this study are in qualitative agreement with clinical findings that are based on long-term studies of natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and of patients undergoing orthotic management for scoliosis.