RESUMEN
Introduction: Implementation of telehealth in high-risk patient populations provides opportunities for continuous interactions and has previously been shown to positively impact practice. However, there is a paucity of studies focused on telehealth in the liver transplant population specific to pharmacist care. Project Aim: Describe the importance of transplant pharmacist treatment decisions between telehealth, in-clinic, and asynchronous (eg chart review and electronic message support) visit types. Design: This was a single-center comparative evaluation of adult liver transplant recipients transplanted between May 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020 with a transplant pharmacist visit between May 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was the average number of treatment decisions per encounter and the average number of important treatment decisions per encounter. The importance of these treatment decisions was determined by a panel of three clinicians. Results: Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria with 85 in-clinic, 42 telehealth, and 55 asynchronous visits. For all treatment decisions, there was no statistical difference in average number of treatment decisions per encounter between telehealth visits and in-clinic visits with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.822 (95% CI, 0.674-1.000; P = 0.051). Similarly, for important treatment decisions, there was no statistical difference between telehealth visits and in-clinic visits (OR 0.847; 95% CI, 0.642-1.116; P = 0.238). Conclusion: Transplant pharmacists can deliver recommendations with similar importance via telehealth compared to in-clinic visits based on the number of total and important treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Atención Ambulatoria , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Rabbit antithymocyte globulin is a lymphocytedepleting agent commonly used as induction therapy in kidney transplants. Although its use is generally safe and well tolerated, serious side effects can occur. Here, we describe a case of a severe immune complex hypersensitivity reaction with disseminated intravascular coagulation in response to rabbit antithymocyte globulin infusion. Immediate treatment required return to the operating room, massive transfusion of blood products, and plasmapheresis. The patient's posttransplant course was significant for volume overload, prolonged respiratory failure, and delayed graft function that required hemodialysis, but within 10 weeks the patient had made a full recovery and kidney allograft function had returned to normal.
Asunto(s)
Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada , Trasplante de Riñón , Suero Antilinfocítico , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/diagnóstico , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/tratamiento farmacológico , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunological response to heparin exposure that predisposes patients to hypercoagulable reactions with subsequent heparin administration. Traditionally, heparin is the standard anticoagulant used during organ procurement to prevent clot formation in grafts. This creates a problem in donors or recipients that develop HIT as they are at risk of developing life-threatening coagulopathy. This raises the question of how to use alternative anticoagulation therapies, such as argatroban, that provide rapid-onset prophylaxis by reversibly inhibiting thrombin. Additionally, there are few studies that have assessed how recipients of multiorgan donors treated with argatroban do post-operatively. CASE REPORT In this report, we discuss the procurement protocol and hospital course of a lung transplant recipient who received a graft treated with argatroban due to a HIT-positive liver recipient. The post-operative course for our patient was uneventful, with improved lung function and no complications attributable to argatroban use. Further, none of the 4 other recipients who received organs from the same donor experienced graft dysfunctions secondary to coagulopathy, including the HIT-positive liver recipient. CONCLUSIONS The ultimate success of grafts without thromboembolic complications suggests the use of argatroban in multiorgan procurement in the setting of a HIT-positive recipient is safe and effective. This case report highlights an alternative to the traditional process of organ procurement with heparin, in which patients at risk of coagulopathies secondary to HIT are able to receive organs when traditional protocols would otherwise be prohibitive.
Asunto(s)
Arginina , Ácidos Pipecólicos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Arginina/análogos & derivados , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pulmón , Ácidos Pipecólicos/uso terapéutico , SulfonamidasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Evidence to guide opioid utilization following kidney transplantation is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of an opioid restrictive post-operative pain management protocol in adult kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent kidney transplant between 1/1/2017 to 8/15/2018. A standardized, opioid restrictive pain management protocol was implemented in February 2018. The primary outcome was quantity of opioid tablets prescribed at discharge. Secondary outcomes included amount of opioid prescribed within first 30 days, number of patient calls for pain, and opioid prescription in electronic medical record (EMR) at 90 days and 1 year. RESULTS: After implementation, significantly fewer opioid tablets were prescribed at discharge (4 vs. 60 tablets, p < .001) and less oral morphine milligram equivalence (OME) were prescribed within 30 days of transplant (38 vs. 300, p < .001). In cohort 2, fewer patients received more than one opioid prescription, more patients received truncal block and only 5 patients received patient controlled analgesia compared to all in cohort 1. CONCLUSION: A standardized, patient-centered pain management strategy after kidney transplantation reduced opioid prescribing without increasing readmissions or clinic calls. This data may be used to inform guidelines for appropriate OME prescribing at discharge after kidney transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Pautas de la Práctica en MedicinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OC), or thrush, in renal transplant recipients receiving nystatin versus no antifungal prophylaxis. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, non-inferiority study of adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs) who received nystatin for 30 days for OC prophylaxis (nystatin group) or no antifungal prophylaxis therapy (No PPX group). The primary outcome was the incidence of OC within 3 months post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included time to OC occurrence and severity of OC. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was 10%. RESULTS: The incidence of OC within 3 months post-transplant among 257 RTRs was 7.8% (10/128) in the No PPX group and 4.7% (6/129) RTRs in the nystatin group, a risk difference of 3.2% (95% CI, -2.7% to 9.1%, non-inferiority P = .04). The median time to OC was 7.5 days (IQR 6.3-34.3 days) in the nystatin group and 9.5 days (IQR 5.3-30.5 days) in the No PPX group (P = .64). Esophageal candidiasis was observed in 10% (1/10) of RTRs with OC in the No PPX group compared to 16.7% (1/6) RTRs in the nystatin group (P = 1.00). All RTRs with OC achieved symptom resolution with fluconazole and/or nystatin. Two patients in the No PPX group required readmission for decreased oral intake, and OC was diagnosed and treated during their hospital day. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of adult RTRs, the absence of antifungal prophylaxis demonstrated non-inferiority to 30-day nystatin prophylaxis at reducing the incidence of OC within 3 months of transplant. OC prophylaxis may not be warranted after renal transplant.
Asunto(s)
Candidiasis Bucal , Trasplante de Riñón , Nistatina/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candidiasis Bucal/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis Bucal/prevención & control , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review describes the efficacy, safety, and drug interactions of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified by English-language MEDLINE search, published prior to May 2020, using the terms kidney transplant, OR PTDM, OR NODAT, AND metformin, OR DPP4, OR GLP1, OR SGLT2. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All selected studies were included if the study population was composed of adult KTRs who were diagnosed with either impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus (DM), new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), or posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM). DATA SYNTHESIS: In KTRs, there is evidence for safety with DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 RAs, and SGLT2 inhibitors. However, urinary tract infections and a slight initial decrease in renal function may limit use of SGLT2 inhibitors. As compared with the nontransplant type 2 DM population, SGLT2 inhibitors are not as efficacious in KTRs. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review provides an overview of the current literature on newer antidiabetic agents, addressing efficacy, safety, and drug interactions to help guide clinical decision-making for their use in KTRs. CONCLUSION: Newer antidiabetic agents have been recommended by the American Diabetes Association for potential cardiovascular, renal, and hypoglycemic benefits. Particular agents, such as DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs may play a role in correcting PTDM-related defects. Clinicians need to take into account both patient-specific and drug-specific characteristics when initiating these agents in KTRs.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/inmunología , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/farmacología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/inmunología , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/farmacología , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
Despite the increased use, comparative safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) against warfarin have not been well studied in kidney transplant recipients. In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated 197 adult kidney transplant recipients on DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2018. The primary outcome was incidence of major bleeding defined as a hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dl, blood transfusion ≥2 units, or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ. Patients were initiated on anticoagulation therapy at a median of 6.5 years post-transplant and followed for a median of 12.3 months. The rates of major bleeding were 7.2% per year with DOACs vs. 11.4% per year with warfarin (Mantel-Cox P = 0.15). No difference was found in composite bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or thromboembolic events between the groups. There was a lower incidence of major bleeding with apixaban compared to all other anticoagulants (6.7% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.027). After controlling for potential confounders, DOAC use was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.27-1.95). Further research is warranted to definitively determine whether DOACs are effective and safe alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in kidney transplant recipients.