RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) including physical, emotional, or sexual abuse; neglect; and/or exposure to household instability have been associated with adult emergency department utilization, but the impact of parental ACEs on pediatric emergency department (PED) utilization has not been studied. The primary aim was to determine if parental ACEs impact resource utilization as measured by (1) frequency of PED utilization, (2) acuity of PED visits, and (3) 72-hour PED return rates. The secondary aim was to determine if resilience interacts with the impact of parental ACEs on PED utilization. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional survey using previously validated measures of ACEs, resiliency, and social determinants of health screening. Surveys were administered from October 17, 2019, to November 27, 2019, via iPad by research assistants in our institution's PEDs. Survey responses were linked to data abstracted from the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize our study population. Pearson correlation was used to identify correlation between ACEs, social determinants of health, and PED utilization measures. RESULTS: A total of 251 parents had complete data. Parental ACEs were positively associated with frequency of PED visits (incidence rate ratio, 1.013). In addition, high levels of parental resilience attenuated the association between parental ACEs and the number of severe acuity visits and were associated with fewer 72-hour return visits (incidence rate ratio, 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Parental ACEs appear to be positively associated with frequency of PED utilization and inversely associated with higher-acuity PED visits and parental resiliency.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Importance: Appendicitis is the most common pediatric surgical emergency. Efforts to improve efficiency and quality of care have increased reliance on computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in children with suspected appendicitis. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic health record-linked clinical decision support intervention, AppyCDS, on diagnostic imaging, health care costs, and safety outcomes for patients with suspected appendicitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this parallel, cluster randomized trial, 17 community-based general emergency departments (EDs) in California, Minnesota, and Wisconsin were randomized to the AppyCDS intervention group or usual care (UC) group. Patients were aged 5 to 20 years, presenting for an ED visit with right-sided or diffuse abdominal pain lasting 5 days or less. We excluded pregnant patients, those with a prior appendectomy, those with selected comorbidities, and those with traumatic injuries. The trial was conducted from October 2016 to July 2019. Interventions: AppyCDS prompted data entry at the point of care to estimate appendicitis risk using the pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC). Based on pARC estimates, AppyCDS recommended next steps in care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were CT, US, or any imaging (CT or US) during the index ED visit. Safety outcomes were perforations, negative appendectomies, and missed appendicitis. Costs were a secondary outcome. Ratio of ratios (RORs) for primary and safety outcomes and differences by group in cost were used to evaluate effectiveness of the clinical decision support tool. Results: We enrolled 3161 patients at intervention EDs and 2779 patients at UC EDs. The mean age of patients was 11.9 (4.6) years and 2614 (44.0%) were boys or young men. RORs for CT (0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19), US (0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.14), and any imaging (0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-1.07) did not differ by study group. In an exploratory analysis conducted in 1 health system, AppyCDS was associated with a reduction in any imaging (ROR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73- 0.93) for patients with pARC score of 15% or less and a reduction in CT (ROR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74) for patients with a pARC score of 16% to 50%. Perforations, negative appendectomies, and cases of missed appendicitis by study phase did not differ significantly by study group. Costs did not differ overall by study group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, AppyCDS was not associated with overall reductions in diagnostic imaging; exploratory analysis revealed more appropriate use of imaging in patients with a low pARC score. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02633735.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Septic arthritis (SA) is responsible for 20% of pediatric musculoskeletal infections (MSKI) and can have significant consequences. Early detection of SA is critical, and procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a promising biomarker. This study assessed the test performance of PCT and traditional biomarkers for suspected SA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study at two pediatric emergency departments (ED). Data collected measured serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell (WBC) count, and PCT. Box and whisker plots were generated to compare the of the biomarkers by positive MSKI or a non-MSKI diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of biomarkers was examined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and optimal cut -points were identified using the Liu method. RESULTS: Procalcitonin performed reasonably well for detection of MSKI (AUC, 0.72; confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59-0.84). However, CRP and ESR performed better (AUC, 0.88 and 0.78, respectively). White blood cell count was not predictive of MSKI. Patients with a PCT value >0.1 ng/mL, ESR values >19.5 mm/h, and a temperature higher than 99.0°F were more than twice as likely to have acute MSKI. A high CRP level was most predictive of acute MSKI, and patients with levels >2.38 mg/dL were 3.5 times more likely to have acute MSKI. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin is a potential biomarker for the clinical differential of MSKI in the pediatric ED. Additional research is warranted to establish the optimal diagnostic level for PCT, to increase sample size, and to examine any impact on cost.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: American Indian (AI) children experience significant disparities in health-care access. As a result, they are more likely to use the emergency department (ED) for nonemergent visits than white children. In a recent study, pediatric ED providers have shown an implicit bias for white children over AI children. To combat implicit bias in an ED setting, we created a protocol for training ED providers as health equity coaches. METHODS: The intervention took place during the fall of 2016 and was composed of 4 educational lectures, 6 to 8 hours of service learning in AI communities, and the participant's dissemination of what was learned through formal presentations and informal conversations with other ED staff. We measured the impact of this intervention on the intervention participants with a group interview at the completion of the intervention. RESULTS: The findings from the group interview provide feedback on what was learned during the intervention, how it impacted providers, and feedback on the structure of the intervention. Overall ED providers reported the intervention improved awareness of their implicit bias and ways to improve communication and care for AI patients. Additional institutional policy and procedural changes are necessary to effectively and sustainably address health disparities affecting AI populations. CONCLUSIONS: The participating providers identified their lack of knowledge regarding AI cultures at the start of the intervention and it became clear that their knowledge, comfort, and relationships with AI communities increased as a result of this intervention.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) in patients with acute abdominal pain has substantial variation across pediatric emergency departments (EDs). This study compares the cost of diagnosing and treating suspected appendicitis across a multicenter network of children's hospitals. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis using deidentified data of a prospective, observational study of patients with suspected appendicitis at nine pediatric EDs. The study included patients 3 to 18 years old who presented to the ED with acute abdominal pain of <96 hours' duration. RESULTS: Our data set contained 2,300 cases across nine sites. There was an appendicitis rate of 31.8% and perforation rate of 25.7%. Sites correctly diagnosed appendicitis in over 95% of cases. The negative appendicitis rate ranged from 2.5% to 4.7% while the missed appendicitis rate ranged from 0.3% to 1.1% with no significant differences in these rates across site. Across sites, we found a strong positive correlation (0.95) between CT rate and total cost per case and a strong negative correlation (-0.71) between US rate and cost. The cost per case at US sites was 5.2% ($367) less than at CT sites (p < 0.001). Similarly, costs per case at mixed sites were 3.4% ($244) less than at CT sites (p < 0.001). Comparing costs among CT sites or among US sites, the cost per case generally increased as the images per case increased among both CT sites and US sites, but the costs were universally higher at CT sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide support for US as the primary imaging modality for appendicitis. Sites that preferentially utilized US had lower costs per case than sites that primarily used CT. Imaging rates across sites varied due to practice patterns and resulted in a significant cost consequence without higher rates for negative appendectomies or missed appendicitis cases.

Asunto(s)