RESUMEN
Rigid metal plates are a promising alternative to wires for reapproximating the sternum after open-heart surgery due to their potential ability to reduce motion at the wound site and thereby reduce the likelihood of post-operative healing complications. Despite initial clinical success, the use of plates has been limited, in part, by insufficient knowledge about their most effective placement. This study compares the ability of five plate configurations to provide stable closure by limiting sternal separation. Commercially available x-shaped and box-shaped plates were used and combinations of parameters (plate type, location, and number of plates) were investigated in vitro. Lateral distraction tests using controlled, uniform loading were conducted on 15 synthetic sterna and the distractions between separated sternum halves were measured at seven locations. Distractions at the xiphoid, a critical region clinically, varied widely from 0.03 +/- 0.53 mm to 4.24 +/- 1.26 mm depending on all three plate parameters. Of the configurations tested, three x-shaped plates and one box-shaped plate resisted sternal separation most effectively. These results provide the first comparison of plate configurations for stabilizing a sternotomy. However, basic mechanical analyses indicate that sternal loading in vivo is non-uniform; future studies will need to accurately quantify in vivo loading to improve in vitro test methods.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijadores Internos , Osteogénesis por Distracción/instrumentación , Esternón/fisiología , Esternón/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Elasticidad , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Estrés MecánicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of severe sternal wound complications in high-risk cardiac patients presents a significant need for more stabile sternal fixation techniques after median sternotomy procedures. Rigid metal plates, a potential alternative to wire fixation, are thought to promote faster sternal healing by reducing motion at the wound site. The goal of this study was to compare the stability provided by commercially available sternal plates with standard wires using an in vitro model. METHODS: Lateral distraction tests were conducted on bisected polyurethane sternal models fixed with either a standard 7 wire configuration (n = 5) or a 3 plate configuration (n = 3). To assure controlled loading, the sternal models were attached to a computer-controlled test machine by a novel tethering system that distributes the total force (180N) equally to eight locations on the sternum. Stability was defined as the ability to restrict sternal separation at seven locations along the midline quantified using digital image analysis. RESULTS: Our results indicate that rigid plate fixation significantly reduced lateral motion relative to wire fixation. The lower sternal region most noticeably benefited from plate fixation as the splaying observed for wire fixation was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Under these loading conditions, plating increased stability at the midline compared to wires; this increased stability may facilitate the recovery of high-risk patients undergoing cardiac operation. To enhance in vitro testing methods, future studies should incorporate additional in vivo loading conditions applied to the sternum. Alternate plating configurations should also be examined to further increase stability.